Three studies were carried out in natural settings of mass gatherings to examine the interplay between activist identity and self-expansion and their relationship with willingness to engage in future collective actions. Study 1 was conducted among activists and supporters of equal rights for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) individuals; Study 2 involved participants in a nationwide charity event; and Study 3 included members of a religious group. The results showed a statistically significant positive relationship between self-perceived activist identity and collective action (CA) tendency (Studies 1, 2, and 3). Moreover, the interaction between activist identity and self-expansion plays a role in predicting CA, with self-expansion related to willingness to engage in progroup behaviors when activist identity is low but not when activist identity is high (Studies 2 and 3). This interaction statistically significantly predicted collective action tendency when nonmaterialistic relational self-expansion and nonrelational self-expansion were considered but not when materialistic self-expansion was tested (Study 3).
AronA.AronE. N.NormanC. (2003). Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S.(Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes (pp. 478–502). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
2.
AronA.LewandowskiG. W.Jr.MashekD.AronE. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
AronA.ParisM.AronE. N. (1995). Falling in love: Prospective studies of self-concept change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1102–1112. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.69.6.1102
4.
AtranS. (2010). Talking to the enemy: Religion, brotherhood, and the (un)making of terrorists. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
5.
BeckerJ. C.TauschN. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non- normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 43–92. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265
6.
BelkR. (1985). Materialism: Trial aspects of living in the material world. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 265–280. doi:10.1086/208515
7.
BelkR. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2489522
8.
CorningA. F.MyersD. (2002). Individual orientation towards engagement in social actions. Political Psychology, 23, 703–729. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3792364
9.
DruryJ.CockingC.BealeJ.HansonC.RapleyF. (2005). The phenomenology of empowerment in collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 309–328. doi:10.1348/014466604X18523
10.
DruryJ.EvripidouA.van ZomerenM.(2015). Empowerment: The intersection of identity and power in collective action. In SindicD.BarretoM.Costa-LopesR. (Eds.), Current Issues in Social Psychology Series: Power and identity (pp. 94–116). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 35–58. doi:10.1002/ejsp.231
12.
DruryJ.ReicherS. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 707–725. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.x
13.
Dys-SteenbergenO.WrightS. C.AronA. (2015). Self-expansion motivation improves cross-group interactions and enhances self-growth. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1368430215583517
14.
GrouzetF. M. E.AhuviaA.KimY.RyanR. M.SchmuckP.KasserT.. . .SheldonK. M. (2005). The structure of goal contents across 15 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 800–816. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.800
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
16.
KarlM. (1995). Women and empowerment: Participation and decision-making. London, UK: Zed Books.
17.
KasmelA.AndersenP. T. (2011). Measurement of community empowerment in three community programs in Rapla (Estonia). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 799–817. doi:10.3390/ijerph8030799
18.
KasserT. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
KhanS. S.HopkinsN.ReicherS.TewariS.SrinivasanN.StevensonC. (2015). How collective participation impacts social identity: A longitudinal study from India. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/pops.12260
20.
KlarM.KasserT. (2009). Some benefits of being an activist: Measuring activism and its role in psychological well being. Political Psychology, 30, 755–777. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2009.00724.x
21.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr. (2013). The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8, 12–22. doi:10.1080/17439760.2012.746999
22.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.Jr. (2014). Expanding the self brick by brick: Nonrelational self-expansion and self-concept size. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 484–490. doi:10.1177/1948550613503886
23.
MattinglyB. A.McintyreK. P.LewandowskiG. W.Jr. (2012). Approach motivation and the expansion of self in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 19, 113–127. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01343.x
24.
NevilleF.ReicherS. (2011). The experience of collective participation: Shared identity, relatedness and emotionality. Contemporary Social Science, 6, 377–396. doi:10.1080/21582041.2012.627277
25.
ReicherS. (2001). The psychology of crowd dynamics. In HoggM. A.TindaleR. S. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 182–208). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
ReicherS.HaslamS. A. (2013). Towards a “science of movement”: Identity, authority and influence in the production of social stability and social change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 112–131. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.266
27.
SimonB.KlandermansB. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319–331. doi:10.1037//0003–066X.56.4.319
28.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194–218. doi:10.1177/1088868309341563
29.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC.MavorK. (2016). Group interaction as the crucible of social identity formation: A glimpse at the foundations of social identities for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19, 137–151. doi:10.1177/1368430215612217
30.
TiceD. M. (1992). Self-concept change and self-presentation: The looking glass self is also a magnifying glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 435–451. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.63.3.435
31.
Van StekelenburgJ. V.KlandermansB. (2013). The social psychology of protest. Current Sociology Review, 61, 886–905. doi:10.1177/0011392113479314
32.
Van ZomerenM. (2015). Collective action as relational interaction: A new relational hypothesis on how non-activists become activists. New Ideas in Psychology, 39, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.04.001
33.
Van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180–199. doi:10.1177/1088868311430835
34.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
35.
Van ZomerenM.SpearsR.FischerA. H.LeachC. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649–664. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.649
36.
WilsonJ. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.215
37.
WilsonJ.MusickM. (1997). Who cares: Towards integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694–713. doi:10.2307/2657355
38.
WrightS. C.AronA.TroppL. R. (2002). Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In ForgasJ. P.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal and intergroup perspectives (pp. 343–368). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
39.
XuX.FloydA. H. L.WestmaasJ. L.AronA. (2010). Self-expansion and smoking abstinence. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 295–301. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.10.019
