Why is the fight against climate change so challenging? Research suggests that climate change information may trigger symbolic defense strategies such as derogative outgroup behaviors (e.g., ethnocentrism) instead of direct attempts to address the problem itself (e.g., proenvironmental behavior). Ingroup affirmation may help decrease symbolic responses. We conducted a 2 (Affirmation: ingroup vs. no affirmation) × 2 (Message: threat vs. control) × 2 (Nation: Austria vs. Argentina) experiment (N = 243) to assess responses to climate change information (direct and symbolic) in participants from individualist and collectivist cultures. Participants responded with higher levels of ethnocentrism and a lower intention to engage in proenvironmental behavior after reading climate change information. This effect was significant in Austria. Using ingroup affirmation as an intervention tended to foster rather than reduce ethnocentrism. Thus, across cultures people resolve climate change threat in symbolic ways rather than by trying to address the problem itself.
AdamsG.DoblesI.GómezL. H.KurtişT.MolinaL. E. (2015). Decolonizing psychological science: Introduction to the special thematic section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3, 213–238. doi:10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564
2.
AgroskinD.JonasE. (2013). Controlling death by defending ingroups – Mediational insights into terror management and control restoration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1144–1158. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.014
3.
AllportG. W. (1948). ABC’s of scapegoating. New York, NY: Anti-Defamation League.
4.
AllportG. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
5.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. doi:10.2307/258189
6.
BizumicB.DuckittJ.PopadicD.DruV.KraussS. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation into a reconceptualization of ethnocentrism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 871–899. doi:10.1002/ejsp.589
7.
BolderdijkJ. W.GorsiraM.KeizerK.StegL. (2013). Values determine the (in)effectiveness of informational interventions in promoting pro-environmental behavior. PLoS ONE, 8, e83911. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0083911
8.
BrockT. C.BallounJ. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 413–428. doi:10.1037/h0021225
9.
BurkeB. L.MartensA.FaucherE. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155–195. doi:10.1177/1088868309352321
10.
CapstickS.WhitmarshL.PidgeonN.UphamP. (2015). International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century: Erratum. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 6, 35–61. doi:10.1002/wcc.321
11.
Čehajić-ClancyS.EffronD. A.HalperinE.LibermanV.RossL. D.EffronD. A.RossL. D. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 256–270. doi:10.1037/a0023936
12.
DanielsD. P.KrosnickJ. A.TichyM. P.TompsonT. (2012). Public opinion on environmental policy in the United States. In KraftM. E.KamienieckiS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 461–486). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
DienesZ. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2015.10.003
14.
DouglasT. (1995). Scapegoats: Transferring blame. New York, NY: Routledge.
15.
DuH.FritscheI.TalatiZ.CastanoE.JonasE. (2016). The possibility of self-determined death eliminates mortality salience effects on cultural worldview defense: Cross-cultural replications. Psychology, 7, 1004–1014. doi:10.4236/psych.2016.77101
16.
DuH.JonasE.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.HuiE. K. P.MaL. (2013). Cultural influences on terror management: Independent and interdependent self-esteem as anxiety buffers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1002–1011. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.06.007
17.
DuckittJ.BizumicB.KraussS. W.HeledE. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2010.00781.x
FritscheI.CohrsJ. C.KesslerT.BauerJ. (2012). Global warming is breeding social conflict: The subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.002
20.
FritscheI.JonasE.AblasserC.BeyerM.KubanJ.MangerA. M.SchultzM. (2013). The power of we: Evidence for group-based control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.014
21.
FritscheI.JonasE.FankhänelT. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 524–541. doi:10.1037/a0012666
22.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.. . . YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104. doi:10.1126/science.1197754
23.
GrayJ. A.McNaughtonN. (2000). Neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of septo-hippocampal theories (2nd ed., Vol. 5). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
HaslamS. A.OakesP. J.ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C. (1999). Social identity salience and the emergence of stereotype consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 809–818. doi:10.1177/0146167299025007004
25.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
HeineS.HariharaM.NiyaY. (2002). Terror management in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5, 187–196. doi:10.1111/1467–839X.00103
27.
HofstedeG. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
JonasE.McGregorI.KlacklJ.AgroskinD.FritscheI.HolbrookC.. . . QuirinM. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 219–286. doi:10.1016/B978–0–12–800052–6.00004–4
31.
KahanD. M.BramanD.MonahanJ.CallahanL.PetersE. (2010). Cultural cognition and public policy: The case of outpatient commitment laws. Journal of Law and Human Behavior, 34, 118–140. doi:10.1007/s10979–008–9174–4
32.
KahanD. M.Jenkins-SmithH.BramanD. (2011). Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 147–174. doi:10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
33.
KashimaE. S.HalloranM.YukiM.KashimaY. (2004). The effects of personal and collective mortality salience on individualism: Comparing Australians and Japanese with higher and lower self-esteem. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 384–392. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.007
34.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.95.1.18
35.
LeeT. M.MarkowitzE. M.HoweP. D.KoC.LeiserowitzA. A. (2015). Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1014–1023. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE2728
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
38.
McCrightA. M.ChartersM.DentzmanK.DietzT. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of climate change frames in the face of a climate change denial counter-frame. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 76–67. doi:10.1111/tops.12171
39.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative White males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163–1172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.06.003
40.
McGregorI.HajiR.KangS. (2008). Can ingroup affirmation relieve outgroup derogation?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1395–1401. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.001
41.
McGregorI.NashK.MannN.PhillsC. E. (2010). Anxious uncertainty and reactive approach motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 133–147. doi:10.1037/a0019701
42.
McGregorI.ZannaM. P.HolmesJ. G.SpencerS. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.80.3.472
43.
OakesP. J.HaslamS. A.MorrisonB.GraceD. (1995). Becoming an in-group: Reexamining the impact of familiarity on perceptions of group homogeneity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 52–61. doi:10.2307/2787143
44.
ProulxT.InzlichtM. (2012). The five “A”s of meaning maintenance: Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 317–335. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2012.702372
45.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106, 835–845. doi:10.1037/0033–295x.106.4.835
46.
R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org
47.
ReesJ. H.KlugS.BambergS. (2015). Guilty conscience: Motivating pro-environmental behavior by inducing negative moral emotions. Climatic Change, 130, 439–452. doi:10.1007/s10584–014–1278-x
48.
RothschildZ. K.LandauM. J.SullivanD.KeeferL. A. (2012). A dual-motive model of scapegoating: Displacing blame to reduce guilt or increase control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1148–1163. doi:10.1037/a0027413
49.
RoutledgeC.JuhlJ.VessM.CatheyC. (2012). Who uses groups to transcend the limits of the individual self? Exploring the effects of interdependent self-construal and mortality salience on investment in social groups. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 483–491. doi:10.1177/1948550612459770
50.
ShepherdS.KayA. C. (2012). On the perpetuation of ignorance: System dependence, system justification, and the motivated avoidance of sociopolitical information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 264–280. doi:10.1037/a0026272
51.
ShermanD. K.KiniasZ.MajorB.KimH. S. (2007). The group as a resource: Reducing biased attributions for group success and failure via group affirmation. Psychological Bulletin, 33, 1100–1112. doi:10.1177/0146167207303027
52.
Spencer-RodgersJ.MajorB.ForsterD. E.PengK.MajorB.ForsterD. E. (2016). The power of affirming group values: Group affirmation buffers the self-esteem of women exposed to blatant sexism. Self and Identity, 15, 413–431. doi:10.1080/15298868.2016.1145593
53.
TaberC. S.MiltonL. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755–769. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5907.2006.00214.x
54.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1989). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
55.
UhlI.JonasE.KlacklJ. (2016). When climate change information causes undesirable side effects: The influence of environmental self-identity and biospheric values on threat responses/Cuando la información sobre el cambio climático tiene efectos indeseados: La influencia de la identidad ambiental y de los valores biosféricos en la respuesta ante una amenaza. Psyecology, 7, 1–28. doi:10.1080/21711976.2016.1242228
56.
Van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2014). I am what I am, by looking past the present: The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46, 626–657. doi:10.1177/0013916512475209
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.54.6.1063
59.
WitteK. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. doi:10.1080/03637759409376328
60.
WitteK.BerkowitzJ. M.CameronK. A.McKeonJ. K. (1998). Preventing the spread of genital warts: Using fear appeals to promote self-protective behaviors. Health Education & Behavior, 25, 571–585. doi:10.1177/109019819802500505
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
