This paper argues that the group’s task is the most neglected moderator in group research. After offering a broad conception of group task, I draw on various sources to illustrate the powerful moderating role of group task and the field’s broad neglect of this moderation. I conclude with some suggestions for how we might better acknowledge and address the importance of group task for group behavior.
AbramsD.HopthrowT.HulbertL.FringsD. (2006). “Groupdrink?” The effect of alcohol on risk attraction among groups versus individuals. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 67, 628–636. doi:10.15288/jsa.2006.67.628
2.
BaronR. S.KerrN. L. (2003). Group process, group decision, group action (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
3.
DavisJ. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97–125. doi:10.1037/h0033951
4.
DiehlM.StroebeW. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392–403. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.61.3.392
5.
FaberN.HäusserJ.KerrN. (2017). Sleep deprivation impairs and caffeine enhances my performance, but not always our performance: How acting in a group can change the effects of impairments and enhancements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 3–28. doi:10.1177/1088868315609487
6.
FiedlerF. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
HackmanJ. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 162–187. doi:10.1016/0022–1031(68)90040–1
8.
HackmanJ.MorrisC. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45–99). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
10.
KerrN. (2009). Group task. In LevineJ.HoggM. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations (pp. 385–390). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
KerrN. (2015, July). The most neglected moderator in groups research. J. E. McGrath Award Lecture presented at the INGRoup annual conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
12.
KerrN. L.BruunS. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224–231. doi:10.1177/014616728172007
13.
LaughlinP.EllisA. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177–189. doi:10.1016/0022–1031(86)90022–3
14.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McGrathJ. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7–27. doi:10.1037/1089–2699.1.1.7
17.
McGrathJ.AltmanI. (1966). Small group research. Oxford, UK: Holt.
18.
MyersD. G.LammH. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 602–627. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.50.6.1141
19.
ShawM. (1973). Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. JSAS Catalogue of Selected Documents in Psychology, 3, 8.
20.
SherifM.HarveyO. J.WhiteB. J.HoodW. R.SherifC. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment (Vol. 10, pp. 150–198). Norman, OK: University Book Exchange.
21.
SteinerI. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.
