Do previous intergroup contact experiences predispose a person to be more inclined to help outgroup members? The present work explores whether the quality of one’s contact experiences with an outgroup is associated with outgroup helping. Across two studies, we examine the relation between intergroup contact (quantity and quality of contact), empathy (Study 1 and Study 2), anxiety (Study 2), and helping intentions across a variety of dimensions and behaviors (Study 1 and Study 2), as well as level of commitment to helping outgroup members (Study 2). Across both studies, quality, more than quantity, contact was associated with increases in outgroup helping intentions, which was explained (i.e., mediated) by empathy. In addition, quality contact was also associated with increased commitment to help an outgroup, which was also explained by empathy. Implications for intergroup helping and emotions are discussed.
AbbottN.CameronL. (2014). What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 167–182. doi:10.1111/josi.12053
2.
AbersonC. L.HaagS. C. (2007). Contact, perspective taking, and anxiety as predictors of stereotype endorsement, explicit attitudes, and implicit attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 179–201. doi:10.1177/1368430207074726
3.
AtkinsD. C.GallopR. J. (2007). Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: A tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 726–735. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.726
4.
BatsonC. D. (2011). The empathy–altruism hypothesis. In BatsonC. D. (Ed.), Altruism in humans (pp. 11–32). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BatsonC. D.ChangJ.OrrR.RowlandJ. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666. doi:10.1177/014616702237647
6.
BatsonC. D.ShawL. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0202_1
7.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.. . . LeyensJ. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. doi:10.1037/a0013470
8.
BrownR.VivianJ.HewstoneM. (1999). Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: The effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 741–764. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199908/09)29:5/6<741::AID-EJSP972>3.0.CO;2-8
9.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
CameronL.RutlandA. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice toward the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469–488. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00469.x
12.
CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR.DouchR. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77, 1208–1219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00929.x
CikaraM.BruneauE. G.SaxeR. R. (2011). Us and them: Intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 149–153. doi:10.1177/0963721411408713
15.
ClackB.DixonJ.TredouxC. (2005). Eating together apart: Patterns of segregation in a multi-ethnic cafeteria. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 1–16. doi:10.1002/casp.787
16.
Cohen-ChenS.van ZomerenM.HalperinE. (2015). Hope(lessness) and collective (in)action in intractable intergroup conflict. In HalperinE.SharvitK. (Eds.), The social psychology of intractable conflict (pp. 89–101). New York, NY: Springer.
17.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770
18.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
19.
CuddyA. J. C.RockM. S.NortonM. I. (2007). Aid in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Inferences of secondary emotions and intergroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 107–118. doi:10.1177/1368430207071344
20.
DhontK.van HielA. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 223–237. doi:10.1177/1368430210391121
21.
DixonJ.DurrheimK. (2003). Contact and the ecology of racial division: Some varieties of informal segregation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 1–23. doi:10.1348/014466603763276090
22.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2005). Beyond the optimal contact strategy: A reality check for the contact hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 697–711. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.697
23.
DixonJ.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2007). Intergroup contact and attitudes toward the principle and practice of racial equality. Psychological Science, 18, 867–872. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01993.x
24.
DovidioJ. F.EllerA.HewstoneM. (2011). Improving intergroup relations through direct, extended and other forms of indirect contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 147–160. doi:10.1177/1368430210390555
25.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.ValidzicA.MatokaK.JohnsonB.FrazierS. (1997). Extending the benefits of recategorization: Evaluations, self-disclosure, and helping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 401–420. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1327
26.
EisenbergN.EggumN. D.GiuntaL. D. (2010). Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 143–180. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x
27.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256. doi:10.1002/ejsp.194
28.
FisherJ. D.NadlerA.LittleJ. S.SaguyT. (2008). Help as a vehicle to reconciliation, with particular reference to help for extreme health needs. In NadlerA.MalloyT. E.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 447–468). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028
Jasinskaja-LahtiI.MähönenT. A.LiebkindK. (2012). Identity and attitudinal reactions to perceptions of inter-group interactions among ethnic migrants: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 312–329. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02059.x
34.
LevineM.ManningR. (2013). Social identity, group processes, and helping in emergencies. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 225–251. doi:10.1080/10463283.2014.892318
35.
LevineM.ProsserA.EvansD.ReicherS. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 443–453. doi:10.1177/0146167204271651
36.
LevineR. V.MartinezT. S.BraseG.SorensonK. (1994). Helping in 36 U.S. cities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 69–82. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.69
37.
LiebkindK.HaaramoJ.Jasinskaja-LahtiI. (2000). Effects of contact and personality on intergroup attitudes of different professionals. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 171–181. doi:10.1002/1099-1298(200005/06)10:3<171::AID-CASP557>3.0.CO;2-I
38.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1998). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
MathurV. A.HaradT.LipkeT.ChiaoJ. Y. (2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. NeuroImage, 51, 1468–1475. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.025
40.
MontoyaR. M.PittinskyT. L. (2011). When increased group identification leads to outgroup liking and cooperation: The role of trust. Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 784–806. doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.538762
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. (2014, February11). Causal effects in mediation modeling: An introduction with applications to latent variables. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/Causal.pdf
44.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
45.
NadlerA.HalabiS. (2006). Intergroup helping as status relations: Effects of status stability, identification, and type of help on receptivity to high-status group’s help. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 97–110. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.97
46.
NesdaleD.GriffithJ.DurkinK.MaassA. (2005). Empathy, group norms and children’s ethnic attitudes. Applied Developmental Psychology, 26, 623–647. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2005.08.003
47.
NierJ. A.GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.BankerB. S.WardC. M.RustM. C. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behavior: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 299–316. doi:10.1177/1368430201004004001
48.
PaluckE. L. (2010). Is it better not to talk? Group polarization, extended contact, and perspective taking in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1170–1185. doi:10.1177/0146167210379868
49.
PearceP. L.AmatoA. R. (1980). The taxonomy of helping: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 363–371. doi:10.2307/3033956
50.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
51.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504
52.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R.WagnerU.ChristO. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
53.
SaguyT.SzekeresH.NouriR.GoldenbergA.DoronG.DovidioJ. F.. . . HalperinE. (2015). Awareness of intergroup help can rehumanize the out-group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 551–558. doi:10.1177/1948550615574748
54.
SaguyT.TauschN.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20, 114–121. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x
55.
SAS Institute Inc. (2013). SAS/STAT user’s guide (Version 9.3) [Computer software and manual]. Cary, NC: Author.
56.
SaucierD. A.MillerC. T.DoucetN. (2005). Differences in helping Whites and Blacks: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 2–16. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_1
57.
SchreiberJ. B.StageF. K.KingJ.NoraA.BarlowE. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–338. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
58.
SegerC. R.SmithE. R.PercyE. J.ConreyF. R. (2014). Reach out and reduce prejudice: The impact of interpersonal touch on intergroup liking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 51–58. doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.856786
59.
SierksmaJ.ThijsJ.VerkuytenM. (2014). Children’s intergroup helping: The role of empathy and peer group norms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 369–383. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.002
60.
SierksmaJ.ThijsJ.VerkuytenM. (2015). In-group bias in children’s intention to help can be overpowered by inducing empathy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 45–56. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12065
61.
StephanW. G.Diaz-LovingR.DuranA. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240–249. doi:10.1177/0022022100031002006
62.
StürmerS.SnyderM.KroppA.SiemB. (2006). Empathy-motivated helping: The moderating role of group membership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 943–956. doi:10.1177/0146167206287363
Van LeeuwenE.van DijkW.KaynakÜ. (2013). Of saints and sinners: How appeals to collective pride and guilt affect outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 781–796. doi:10.1177/1368430213485995
65.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice toward immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
66.
WeilJ. H. (2007). Discrimination, segregation, and the racialized search for housing post-Katrina. In BatesK. A.SwanR. S. (Eds.), Through the eye of Katrina: Social justice in the United States (pp. 221–236). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
67.
ZagefkaH.NoorM.BrownR.De MouraG. R.HopthrowT. (2011). Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused event. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 353–363. doi:10.1002/ejsp.781
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
