Most of the literature on collective victimhood has focused on its negative consequences for conflict resolution. Only recently has the understanding emerged that collective victimhood can also play a role in reconciliation. The present research aimed to test this recent insight in the context of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. A sample of 200 Israeli Jews who participated in the 2015 Israeli–Palestinian Memorial Day ceremony organized by the Combatants for Peace organization completed online questionnaires. In line with our predictions, personal victimization (i.e., losing a significant other due to the conflict) and inclusive victim perceptions (i.e., perceptions of a “common victim identity,” namely, similarity between the ingroup’s and the outgroup’s suffering) predicted peace activism. However, perceptions of a common perpetrator identity failed to predict activism. These results were replicated in a sample of 106 Israeli Jews who participated in the 2016 ceremony. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
2.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453. doi:10.1177/0002764207302462
3.
BaumeisterR. F. (1996). Evil: Inside human cruelty and violence. New York, NY: Henry Hold.
4.
Ben-AmosA.Bet-ElI. (1999). Holocaust Day and Memorial Day in Israeli schools: Ceremonies, education and history. Israel Studies, 4, 258–284. doi:10.2979/ISR.1999.4
5.
CanettiD.LindnerM. (2014). Exposure to political violence and political behavior: Psychological mechanisms for transformation. In ReynoldsK. J.BranscombeN. R. (Eds.), The psychology of change: Life contexts, experiences, and identities (pp. 77–95). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
6.
Canetti-NisimD.HalperinE.SharvitK.HobfollS. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, 363–389. doi:10.1177/0022002709333296
7.
CohrsJ. C.McNeillA.VollhardtJ. R. (2015). The two-sided role of inclusive victimhood for intergroup reconciliation: Evidence from Northern Ireland. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 21, 634–647. doi:10.1037/pac0000141
8.
Combatants for Peace. (n.d.). Sharing the pain: Building hope. Israeli–Palestinian Memorial Day ceremony 10.05.16. Retrieved from http://cfpeace.org/projects/memorial-day/
9.
CurtinN.McGartyC. (2016). Expanding on psychological theories of engagement to understand activism in context(s). Journal of Social Issues, 72, 227–241. doi:10.1111/josi.12164
10.
ElcherothG. (2006). Individual-level and community-level effects of war trauma on social representations related to humanitarian law. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 907–930. doi:10.1002/ejsp.330
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
12.
GaertnerS.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing inter-group bias: The common in-group identity model. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
13.
GaltungJ. (1969). Violence, peace and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 3, 176–191. doi:10.1177/002234336900600301
14.
HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish society. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 637–651. doi:10.1177/0022343311412642
15.
Janoff-BulmanR. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York, NY: The Free Press.
16.
KelmanH. C. (2004). Reconciliation as identity change: A social-psychological perspective. In Bar-Simon-TovY. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 111–124). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
KlandermansB.OegemaD. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519–531. doi:10.2307/2095297
18.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 125–143. doi:10.1111/josi.12007
19.
Kremer-SharonS.SharvitK.EitamB. (2015, June). Can our own victimization lead us to help the less fortunate? The role of victim category accessibility. Paper presented at the 17th Jena Workshop on Intergroup Processes: EASP Small Meeting on Social Justice, Inequality, and Recognition, Oppurg, Germany.
20.
MaozI.Bar-OnD. (2002). From working through the Holocaust to current ethnic conflicts: Evaluating the TRT group workshop in Hamburg. Group, 26, 29–48. doi:10.1023/A:1015595027902
21.
MummendeyA.KesslerT.KlinkA.MielkeR. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229–245. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229
22.
NadlerA.LiviatanI. (2006). Inter-group reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459–470. doi:10.1177/0146167205276431
23.
NawataK.YamaguchiH. (2012). The role of collective victimhood in intergroup aggression: Japan–China relations [in Japanese]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu, 83, 489–495.
24.
NoorM.BrownR.PrenticeG. (2008). Precursors and mediators of inter-group reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481–495. doi:10.1348/014466607X238751
25.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.DoosjeB. (2015). Peace vision and its socio-emotional antecedents: The role of forgiveness, trust and inclusive victim perceptions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 644–654. doi:10.1177/1368430215586604
26.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374. doi:10.1177/1088868312440048
27.
PenicS.ElcherothG.SpiniD. (2016). When is collective exposure to war events related to more acceptance of collective guilt?Journal of Conflict Resolution. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022002716645388
28.
RotellaK. N.RichesonJ. A.ChiaoJ. Y.BeanM. G. (2012). Blinding trust: The effect of perceived group victimhood on intergroup trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 115–127. doi:10.1177/0146167212466114
29.
SchmidtS. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100. doi:10.1037/a0015108
30.
ShnabelN.HalabiS.NoorM. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.007
31.
ShnabelN.NoorM. (2012). Competitive victimhood among Jewish and Palestinian Israelis reflects differential threats to their identities: The perspective of the needs-based model. In JonasK. J.MortonT. (Eds.), Restoring civil societies: The psychology of intervention and engagement following crisis (pp. 192–207). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
32.
SimanTov-NachlieliI.ShnabelN. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301–314. doi:10.1177/0146167213510746
33.
SimanTov-NachlieliI.ShnabelN.HalabiS. (2015). Winning the victim status can open conflicting groups to reconciliation: Evidence from the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 139–145. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2091
34.
SonnenscheinN. (2008). An identity challanging dialoge. Haifa, Israel: Pardes.
35.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504–535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
36.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135–159. doi:10.1080/10781910802544373
37.
VollhardtJ. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In TroppL. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136–157). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
VollhardtJ. R. (2015). Inclusive victim consciousness in advocacy, social movements, and intergroup relations: Promises and pitfalls. Social Issues and Policy Review, 9, 89–120. doi:10.1111/sipr.12011
39.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36, 489–506. doi:10.1111/pops.12174
40.
VollhardtJ. R.NairR.TroppL. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46, 354–368. doi:10.1111/jasp.12368
41.
WederN.Garcia-NietoR.CanettiD. (2010). Peace, reconciliation and tolerance in the Middle East: The impact of people-to-people peace building initiatives among Israeli Jews and Palestinians who lost a first-degree family member due to the conflict: A pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health, 39, 59–81. doi:10.2753/IMH0020-7411390404
42.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. (2008). Remembering historical victimisation: Collective guilt for current in-group transgression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 988–1006. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.988
