President Obama’s historic status as the nation’s first African American president has led to a “spillover” of racialization in the form of a strengthened relationship between racial attitudes and beliefs and judgments about policies he is associated with. We argue that even basic perceptions of the fairness of the presidential election became racialized in 2008 and 2012. Consistent with this, data from two national surveys revealed that Whites high in racial resentment and racial-stereotype endorsement were less likely to believe the 2008 and 2012 elections were conducted fairly, especially among those for whom the election result was unwelcome, that is, Republicans and conservatives. We find that this result is specific to years that Obama was on the ballot, suggesting a unique role for Obama’s candidacy in boosting the impact of racial attitudes and beliefs.
AndersonC. J.BlaisA.BowlerS.DonovanT.ListhaugO. (2005). Losers’ consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
2.
AnsolabehereS.PersilyN. (2008). Vote fraud in the eye of the beholder: The role of public opinion in the challenge to voter identification requirements. Harvard Law Review, 121, 1737–1774. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1099056
3.
BaguleyT. (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported?British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617. doi:10.1348/000712608X377117
4.
BlockR. (2011). Backing Barack because he’s Black: Racially motivated voting in the 2008 election. Social Science Quarterly, 92, 423–446. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00776.x
5.
BoboL. D.DawsonM. C. (2009). A change has come. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 6, 1–14. doi:10.1017/s1742058x09090018
6.
BobocelD. R.Son HingL. S.DaveyL. M.StanleyD. J.ZannaM. P. (1998). Justice-based opposition to social policies: Is it genuine?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 653–669. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.653
7.
CrandallC. S.BeasleyR. K. (2001). Politics, prejudice, social institutions, and moral value. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 77–102). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
DreierP.MartinC. R. (2010). How ACORN was framed: Political controversy and media agenda setting. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 761–792. doi:10.1017/s1537592710002069
10.
EastonD. (1965). A system analysis of political life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
11.
EdsallT. B.EdsallM. D. (1991). Chain reaction: The impact of race, rights, and taxes on American politics. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
12.
FedericoC. M. (2004). When do welfare attitudes become racialized? The paradoxical effects of education. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 374–391. doi:10.2307/1519889
13.
FedericoC. M.SidaniusJ. (2002). Sophistication and the antecedents of Whites’ racial policy attitudes: Racism, ideology, and affirmative action in America. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 145–176. doi:10.1086/339848
14.
FeldmanS.HuddyL. (2005). Racial resentment and White opposition to race-conscious programs: Principles or prejudice?American Journal of Political Science, 49, 168–183. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00117.x
15.
FeyginaI.TylerT. R. (2009). Procedural justice and system-justifying motivations. In JostJ. T.KayA. C.ThorisdottirH. (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 351–370). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
16.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17.
GilensM. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
18.
GreenwaldA. G.SmithC. T.SriramN.Bar-AnanY.NosekB. A. (2009). Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 US presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9, 241–253. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2009.01195.x
19.
HendersonM.HillygusD. S. (2011). The dynamics of health care opinion, 2008–2010: Partisanship, self-interest and racial resentment. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 36, 945–960. doi:10.1215/03616878-1460533
20.
HetheringtonM. J.WeilerJ. D. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HibbingJ. R.Theiss-MorseE. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
HodsonG.DhontK. (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42. doi:10.1080/10463283.2015.1070018
23.
HuddyL.FeldmanS. (2009). On assessing the political effects of racial prejudice. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 423–447. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.062906.070752
24.
HutchingsV. L. (2009). Change or more of the same? Evaluating racial attitudes in the Obama era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 917–942. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp080
JackmanS. D.VavreckL. (2010). Primary politics: Race, gender, and age in the 2008 Democratic primary. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 20, 153–186. doi:10.1080/17457281003697156
27.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
28.
JostJ. T.FedericoC. M.NapierJ. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
29.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
30.
JostJ. T.NosekB. A.GoslingS. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
31.
KamC.KinderD. R. (2012). Ethnocentrism as a short-term influence in the 2008 election. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 326–340. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00564.x
32.
KinderD. R.Dale-RiddleA. (2012). The end of race? Obama, 2008, and racial politics in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
KinderD. R.SandersL. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
34.
KinderD. R.SearsD. O. (1981). Prejudice and politics: Symbolic racism versus racial threats to the good life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 414–431. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.3.414
35.
KnowlesE. D.LoweryB. S.SchaumbergR. L. (2010). Racial prejudice predicts opposition to Obama and his health care reform plan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 420–423. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.011
36.
KnuckeyJ. (2011). Racial resentment and vote choice in the 2008 US presidential election. Politics & Policy, 39, 559–582. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1346.2011.00304.x
37.
Lewis-BeckM. S.TienC.NadeauR. (2010). Obama’s missed landslide: A racial cost?PS: Political Science and Politics, 43, 69–76. doi:10.1017/s1049096509990618
38.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Political man. New York, NY: Doubleday.
39.
MendelbergT. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
NadeauR.BlaisA. (1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23, 553–563. doi:10.1017/s0007123400006736
41.
NewtonK. (2007). Social and political trust. In DaltonR.KlingemannH. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 342–361). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
NtetaT. M.GreenleeJ. S. (2013). A change is gonna come: Generational membership and White racial attitudes in the 21st century. Political Psychology, 34, 877–987. doi:10.1111/pops.12028
43.
ParkerC. S.BarretoM. A. (2013). Change they can’t believe in: The Tea Party and reactionary politics in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
PasekJ.TahkA.LelkesY.KrosnickJ. A.PayneB. K.AkhtarO.TompsonT. (2009). Determinants of turnout and candidate choice in the 2008 US presidential election: Illuminating the impact of racial prejudice and other considerations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 943–994. doi:10.1093/poq/nfp079
45.
PayneB. K.KrosnickJ. A.PasekJ.LelkesY.AkhtarO.TompsonT. (2010). Implicit and explicit prejudice in the 2008 American presidential election. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 367–374. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.11.001
46.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (2002). The racial components of “race-neutral” crime policy attitudes. Political Psychology, 23, 59–75. doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00270
47.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (2010). Justice in America: The separate realities of Blacks and Whites. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
PistonS. (2010). How explicit racial prejudice hurt Obama in the 2008 election. Political Behavior, 32, 431–451. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9108-y
49.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational & Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
50.
SearsD. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In KatzP. A.TaylorD. A. (Eds.), Eliminating racism: Profiles in controversy (pp. 53–84). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
51.
SearsD. O.HenryP. J. (2005). Over thirty years later: A contemporary look at symbolic racism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 95–150. doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37002-x
52.
SearsD. O.KinderD. R. (1971). Racial tension and voting in Los Angeles. In HirschW. Z. (Ed.), Los Angeles: Viability and prospects for metropolitan leadership (pp. 51–88). New York, NY: Praeger.
53.
SearsD. O.McConahayJ. B. (1973). The politics of violence: The new urban Blacks and the Watts riot. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
54.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.BoboL. D. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 476–490. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.476
55.
SkitkaL. J.WinquistJ.HutchinsonS. (2003). Are outcome fairness and outcome favorability distinguishable psychological constructs? A meta-analytic review. Social Justice Research, 16, 309–341. doi:10.1023/a:1026336131206
56.
SnidermanP. M.PiazzaT. L. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
TeslerM. (2012). The spillover of racialization into health care: How President Obama polarized public opinion by racial attitudes and race. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 690–704. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00577.x
58.
TeslerM. (2013). The return of old-fashioned racism to White Americans’ partisan preferences in the early Obama era. The Journal of Politics, 75, 110–123. doi:10.1017/s0022381612000904
59.
TeslerM.SearsD. O. (2010). Obama’s race: The 2008 election and the dream of a post-racial America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
60.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
61.
WilsonD. C.BrewerP. R. (2013). The foundations of public opinion on voter ID laws: Political predispositions, racial resentment, and information effects. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 962–984. doi:10.1093/poq/nft026
62.
WilsonD. C.King-MeadowsT. (2016). Perceived electoral malfeasance and resentment over the election of Barack Obama. Electoral Studies, 44, 35–45. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.07.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
