We investigated how and when gender dissimilarity relates to two highly important individual work outcomes: social inclusion and absenteeism. We collected survey data among 397 employees from a university of applied sciences and combined these with data from the organization’s personnel administration. Our results indicate that dissimilarity was negatively related to perceived work group inclusion. In addition, this negative effect was stronger when the group was perceived to have a negative diversity climate. Finally, there was a conditional indirect effect of gender dissimilarity on absenteeism through inclusion. That is, being different from other group members in terms of gender was associated with higher absenteeism through lower levels of perceived inclusion, but only when the group was perceived to have a negative diversity climate. Together, the present research demonstrates that sometimes being different is associated with more absences and underlines the importance of establishing a positive climate for gender diversity.
AndersonT. (2005). Employers miss standard measures for absences. Employee Benefit News, 19, 12–82.
2.
ArmesA. (2005). Study examines costs of unscheduled absenteeism. Safety & Health, 172, 15–16.
3.
AveryD. R.McKayP. F.WilsonD. C.TonidandelS. (2007). Unequal attendance: The relationships between race, organizational diversity cues, and absenteeism. Personnel Psychology, 60, 875–902. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.2007.00094.x
4.
BacharachS. B.BambergerP.BironM. (2010). Alcohol consumption and workplace absenteeism: The moderating effect of social support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 334–348. doi:10.1037/a0018018
5.
BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.CiaroccoN. J.TwengeJ. M. (2005). Social exclusion impairs self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 589–604. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.88.4.589
6.
BrewerM. B.MillerN. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In MillerN.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281–302). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
7.
BricksonS. (2000). The impact of identity orientation on individual and organizational outcomes in demographically diverse settings. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 82–101. doi:10.2307/259264
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2012 (Report 1044). Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsrace2012.pdf
9.
ChatmanJ. A.O’ReillyC. A. (2004). Asymmetric reactions to work group sex diversity among men and women. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 193–208. doi:10.2307/20159572
10.
ChattopadhyayP.GeorgeE.LawrenceS. A. (2004). Why does dissimilarity matter? Exploring self-categorization, self-enhancement, and uncertainty reduction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 892–900. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.89.5.892
11.
ChattopadhyayP.GeorgeE.NgC. K. (2011). An uncertainty reduction model of relational demography. In JoshiA.LiaoH.MartocchioJ. J. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (30th ed., pp. 219–251). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
12.
ChattopadhyayP.GeorgeE.NgC. K. (2015). Hearts and minds: Integrating regulatory focus and relational demography to explain responses to dissimilarity. Organizational Psychology Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2041386615574540
13.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
EllemersN.JettenJ. (2013). The many ways to be marginal in a group. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 3–21. doi:10.1177/1088868312453086
15.
FieldA. P. (2005). Intraclass correlation. In EverittB.HowellD. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (pp. 948–954). New York, NY: Wiley.
16.
GeorgeJ. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.75.2.107
17.
GoldbergC. B.RiordanC.SchafferB. S. (2010). Does social identity theory underlie relational demography? A test of the moderating effects of uncertainty reduction and status enhancement on similarity effects. Human Relations, 63, 903–926. doi:10.1177/0018726709347158
18.
GonzalezJ. A.DenisiA. S. (2009). Cross-level effects of demography and diversity climate on organizational attachment and firm effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 21–40. doi:10.1002/job.498
19.
GuillaumeY. R. F.BrodbeckF. C.RikettaM. (2012). Surface- and deep-level dissimilarity effects on social integration and individual effectiveness related outcomes in work groups: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 80–115. doi:10.1111/j.2044–8325.2010.02005.x
20.
GuillaumeY. R. F.van KnippenbergD.BrodbeckF. C. (2014). Nothing succeeds like moderation: A social self-regulation perspective on cultural dissimilarity and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1284–1308. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.0046
21.
HarquailC. V.CoxT. C. (1993). Organizational culture and acculturation. In CoxT. J. (Ed.), Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research & practice (pp. 161–176). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
22.
HarrisonD. A.KleinK. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199–1228. doi:10.2307/20159363
23.
HarrisonD. A.MartocchioJ. J. (1998). Time for absenteeism: A 20-year review of origins, offshoots, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 24, 305–350. doi:10.1016/S0149–2063(99)80064–6
24.
HewstoneM.BrownR. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the “contact hypothesis.” In HewstoneM.BrownR. (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Social psychology and society (pp. 1–44). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
25.
HofhuisJ.van der ZeeK. I.OttenS. (2012). Social identity patterns in culturally diverse organizations: The role of diversity climate. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 964–989. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2011.00848.x
26.
HoggM. A.TerryD. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140. doi:10.2307/259266
27.
HomanA. C.BuengelerC.EckhoffR. A.van GinkelW. P.VoelpelS. C. (2015). The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1456–1467. doi:10.1037/apl0000013
28.
HowellD. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.
29.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA. (2011). Work team diversity. In ZedeckS. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (1st ed., pp. 651–686). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.69.1.85
31.
JansenW. S.OttenS.van der ZeeK. I.JansL. (2014). Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 370–385. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2011
32.
JansenW. S.VosM. W.OttenS.PodsiadlowskiA.van der ZeeK. I. (2015). Colorblind or colorful? How diversity approaches affect cultural majority and minority employees. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jasp.12332
33.
JohnsG. (1994). How often were you absent? A review of the use of self-reported absence data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 574–591. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.79.4.574
34.
JoshiA.RohH. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599–627.
35.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617. doi:10.1177/000312240607100404
36.
McKayP. F.AveryD. R.TonidandelS.MorrisM. A.HernandezM.HeblM. R. (2007). Racial differences in employee retention: Are diversity climate perceptions the key?Personnel Psychology, 60, 35–62. doi:10.1111/j.1744–6570.2007.00064.x
37.
MullenB.ChapmanJ. G.PeaughS. (1989). Focus of attention in groups: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 807–817. doi:10.1080/00224545.1989.9712089
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
40.
OakesP.HaslamS. A.TurnerJ. C. (1998). The role of prototypicality in group influence and cohesion: Contextual variation in the graded structure of social categories. In WorchelS.MoralesJ. F.PáezD.DeschampsJ. (Eds.), Social identity: International perspectives (pp. 75–92). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
PfefferJ. (1983). Organizational demography. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 299–357). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42.
PhillipsK. W.Kim-JunS.ShimS. (2011). The value of diversity in organizations: A social psychological perspective. In De CremerD.van DickR.MurnighanJ. K. (Eds.), Social psychology and organizations (pp. 253–271). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
43.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.88.5.879
44.
RauB. L.HylandM. M. (2003). Corporate teamwork and diversity statements in college recruitment brochures: Effects on attraction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2465–2492. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2003.tb02776.x
45.
RhoadesL.EisenbergerR. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698–714. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.87.4.698
46.
RothL. M. (2004). Engendering inequality: Processes of sex-segregation on Wall Street. Sociological Forum, 19, 203–228. doi:10.1023/B:SOFO.0000031980.82004.d7
47.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 38–48). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
48.
TsuiA. S.EganT. D.O’ReillyC. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579. doi:10.2307/2393472
49.
TsuiA. S.GutekB. A. (1999). Demographic differences in organizations: Current research and future directions. New York, NY: Lexington Books/Macmillan.
50.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
51.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.CiaroccoN. J.BartelsJ. M. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 56–66. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.92.1.56
52.
VandenbergR. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of an improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139–158. doi:10.1177/1094428102005002001
53.
WilliamsK. D.NidaS. A. (2011). Ostracism: Consequences and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 71–75. doi:10.1177/0963721411402480
54.
WolfsonN.KraigerK.FinkelsteinL. (2011). The relationship between diversity climate perceptions and workplace attitudes. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 14, 161–176. doi:10.1080/10887156.2011.546170
