In this paper, we analyzed the relationships among political identity, the perception of moral distance between the political ingroup and the political outgroup, and outgroup animalistic dehumanization. One correlational and one experimental study revealed a positive correlation of ingroup identification (Study 1, N = 99) and salience of ingroup membership (Study 2, N = 96) with the degree to which participants dehumanized the outgroup. This relationship was mediated by the perceived moral distance between the ingroup and the outgroup. The limitations, implications, and possible developments derived from the present findings are discussed.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
2.
BarretoM.EllemersN. (2000). You can’t always do what you want: Social identity and self-presentational determinants of the choice to work for a low-status group. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 891–906. doi:10.1177/01461672002610001
3.
BastianB.LahamS. M.WilsonS.HaslamN.KovalP. (2011). Blaming, praising, and protecting our humanity: The implications of everyday dehumanization for judgments of moral status. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 469–483. doi:10.1348/014466610X521383
4.
BobbioN. (1998). Elogio della mitezza e altri scritti morali [In praise of meekness and other moral writings]. Milano, Italy: Pratiche.
5.
BobbioN.MatteucciN.PasquinoG. (Eds.). (1990). Dizionario di politica [Dictionary of politics]. Torino, Italy: Utet.
6.
BrambillaM.SacchiS.PagliaroS.EllemersN. (2013). Morality and intergroup relations: Threats to safety and group image predict the desire to interact with outgroup and ingroup members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 811–821. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.005
7.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
8.
CapraraG. V.BarbaranelliC.PastorelliC.IafrateC.BerettaM.StecaP.BanduraA. (2006). La misura del disimpegno morale nel contesto delle trasgressioni dell’agire quotidiano [The assessment of moral disengagement in the transgressions of everyday action]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 33, 83–106. doi:10.1421/21961
CombsD. J. Y.PowellC. A. J.SchurtzD. R.SmithR. H. (2009). Politics, schadenfreude, and ingroup identification: The sometimes happy thing about a poor economy and death. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 635–646. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.009
11.
CorbettaP.CavazzaN.RoccatoM. (2009). Between ideology and social representations: Four theses plus (a new) one on the relevance and meaning of left and right. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 622–641. doi:10.1111/j.1475–6765.2009.00845.x
12.
CrawfordJ.ModriS.MotylM. (2013). Bleeding-heart liberals and hard-hearted conservatives: Subtle political dehumanization through differential attributions of human nature and human uniqueness traits. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 86–104. doi:10.5964/jspp.v1i1.184
DeauxK.ReidA.MizrahiK.EthierK. (1995). Parameters of social identities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 280–291. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.68.2.280
15.
DemoulinS.Rodrıguez-TorresR.Rodrıguez-PerezA.VaesJ.PaladinoM. P.GauntR.…. LeyensJ. P. (2009). Emotional prejudice can lead to infra-humanisation. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 259–296. doi:10.1080/00207590802057654
16.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 41–113). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
EllemersN.PagliaroS.BarretoM. (2013). Morality and behavioural regulation in groups: A social identity approach. European Review of Social Psychology, 24, 160–193. doi:10.1080/10463283.2013.841490
18.
EllemersN.PagliaroS.BarretoM.LeachC. W. (2008). Is it better to be moral than smart? The effects of morality and competence norms on the decision to work at group status improvement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1397–1410. doi:10.1037/a0012628
19.
EllemersN.van den BosK. (2012). Morality in groups: On the social-regulatory functions of right and wrong. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 878–889. doi:10.1111/spc3.12001
20.
FarinaA.ChapnickB.ChapnickJ.MisitiR. (1972). Political views and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 273–278. doi:10.1037/h0032873
21.
Giner-SorollaR.LeidnerB.CastanoE. (2012). Dehumanization, demonization and morality shifting. In HoggM. A.BlaylockD. L. (Eds.), Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty (pp. 165–182). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22.
GreenS. (2004). Social identity theory and party identification. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 136–153. doi:10.1111/j.0038–4941.2004.08501010.x
23.
HaidtJ.RosenbergE.HomH. (2003). Differentiating diversity: Moral diversity is not like other kinds. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2003.tb02071.x
24.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
25.
HaslamN.BastianB.LahamS.LoughnanS. (2012). Humanness, dehumanization, and moral psychology. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 203–218). Washington, DC: APA Press.
26.
HaslamN.LoughnanS. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213–115045
27.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process.pdf
28.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
29.
HinkleS.BrownR. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identities: Sonic links and lacunae. In AbramsD.HoggM. (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48–70). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Weatsheaf.
30.
HuddyL. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–156. doi:10.1111/0162–895X.00230
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222–1233. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.71.6.1222
33.
JostJ. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.61.7.651
34.
JostJ. T.LedgerwoodA.HardinC. D. (2007). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 171–186. doi:10.1111/j.1751–9004.2007.00056.x
35.
KarabenickS. A.LernerR. M.BeecherM. D. (1973). Relation of political affiliation to helping behavior on Election Day November 7, 1972. The Journal of Social Psychology, 91, 223–227. doi:10.1080/00224545.1973.9923045
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234–249. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.93.2.234
38.
LeachC. W.SpearsR.BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 923–943. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.84.5.932
39.
LeyensJ. P.CortesB.DemoulinS.DovidioJ. F.FiskeS. T.GauntR.… VaesJ. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism: The 2002 Tajfel Lecture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 703–717. doi:10.1002/ejsp.170
40.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.KashimaY. (2009). Understanding the relationship between attribute-based and metaphor-based dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 747–762. doi:10.1177/1368430209347726
41.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.MurnaneT.VaesJ.ReynoldsC.SuitnerC. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717. doi:10.1002/ejsp.755
42.
LoughnanS.PacilliM. G. (2014). Seeing (and treating) others as sexual objects: Towards a more complete mapping of sexual objectification. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 21, 1–17. doi:10.4473/TPM21.3.6
43.
MalkaA.LelkesY. (2010). More than ideology: Conservative–liberal identity and receptivity to political cues. Social Justice Research, 23, 156–188. doi:10.1007/s11211–010–0114–3
44.
Mucchi-FainaA.PacilliM. G.PagliaroS.AlparoneF. R. (2009). Ambivalence in intergroup evaluation: The role of fairness norm. Social Justice Research, 22, 117–133. doi:10.1007/s11211–009–0090–7
45.
PacilliM. G.Mucchi-FainaA.PagliaroS.MirisolaA.AlparoneF. R. (2013). When affective (but not cognitive) ambivalence predicts discrimination towards a minority group. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 1–15. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.701251
46.
PagliaroS.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2011). Sharing moral values: Anticipated in-group respect as a determinant of adherence to morality-based (but not competence-based) group norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1117–1129. doi:10.1177/0146167211406906
47.
PetersS. L.van den BosK. (2008). When fairness is especially important: Reactions to being inequitably paid in communal relationships. Social Justice Research, 21, 86–105. doi:10.1007/s11211–007–0056–6
48.
ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C.HaslamS. A.RyanM. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427–434. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1473
49.
RicolfiL. (1999). Destra e sinistra? Studi sulla geometria dello spazio elettorale [Left and right? Studies on electoral space]. Torino, Italy: Omega Edizioni.
50.
SchmittC. (1927). Der Begriff des Politischen [Left(right)-winger]. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 58(1), 1–33.
51.
ShnabelN.HalabibS.NoorM. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.007
52.
SkitkaL. J.MullenE. (2002). Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1419–1429. doi:10.1177/014616702236873
53.
TajfelH. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London, UK: Academic Press.
54.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.
55.
VentroneA. (2005). Il nemico interno. Immagini e simboli della lotta politica nell’Italia del ‘900 [The inside enemy. Images and symbols of the political struggle in Italy in the ‘900]. Roma, Italy: Donzelli editore.
56.
WetherellG.BrandtM. J.ReynaC. (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychology and Personality Science, 4, 658–667. doi:10.1177/1948550613476096
57.
YanayN. (2013). The ideology of hatred. The psychic power of discourse. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
