Recent studies have found disapproval of peer punishment of norm violations. This seems puzzling, given the potential benefits peer punishers contribute to the group. We suggest part of the answer is that peer punishers tend to come across as aggressive and as such may be viewed as more problematic than beneficial to have around. We used simple computer animations of geometric shapes to enact 15 precise variations of social sanctions against a norm violator. More than 1,800 subjects were recruited to watch an animation and judge the behavior and character of the animated agents. They also completed a trait aggression measure. Across the variations peer punishment was typically disapproved of, especially when severe or openly aggressive, and especially by subjects low on trait aggression. We conclude that there seems to be a social norm against peer punishment and that dislike of aggressiveness seems to be part of the reason why.
BalafoutasL.NikiforakisN. (2012). Norm enforcement in the city: A natural field experiment. European Economic Review, 56, 1773–1785. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.09.008
2.
BallietD.MulderL. B.van LangeP. A. M. (2011). Reward, punishment, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 594–615. doi:10.1037/a0023489
3.
BeckerG. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 169, 176–177. doi:10.1086/259394
4.
BellM. D.FiszdonJ. M.GreigT. C.WexlerB. E. (2010). Social attribution test-multiple choice (SAT-MC) in schizophrenia: Comparison with community sample and relationship to neurocognitive, social cognitive and symptom measures. Schizophrenia Research, 122, 164–171. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.03.024
5.
BrauerM.ChekrounP. (2005). The relationship between perceived violation of social norms and social control: Situational factors influencing the reaction to deviance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1519–1539. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2005.tb02182.x
6.
BryantF. B.SmithB. D. (2001). Refining the architecture of aggression: A measurement model for the Buss–Perry aggression questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 138–167. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2000.2302
7.
BuhrmesterM. D.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
8.
BurnhamT. C. (2007). High-testosterone men reject low Ultimatum Game offers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2327–2330. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0546
9.
CastelliF.HappéF.FrithU.FrithC. (2000). Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns. NeuroImage, 12, 314–325. doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0612
10.
ChaurandN.BrauerM. (2008). What determines social control? People’s reactions to counternormative behaviors in urban environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1689–1715. doi:10.1111/j.1559–1816.2008.00365.x
ErikssonK.CowndenD.EhnM.StrimlingP. (2014). “Altruistic” and “antisocial” punishers are one and the same. Review of Behavioral Economics, 3, 1–13. doi:10.1561/105.00000009
13.
ErikssonK.StrimlingP.EhnM. (2013). Ubiquity and efficiency of restrictions on informal punishment rights. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 17–34. doi:10.1556/JEP.11.2013.1.3
14.
FehrE.GächterS. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90, 980–994. doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980
15.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092–6566(03)00046–1
16.
HeiderF.SimmelM. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259. doi:10.2307
17.
HenrichJ.BoydR. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, 79–89. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2202
18.
HoR.ForsterLeeL.ForsterLeeR.CroftsN. (2002). Justice versus vengeance: Motives underlying punitive judgements. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 365–377. doi:10.1016/S0191–8869(01)00161–1
19.
HoritaY. (2010). Punishers may be chosen as providers but not as recipients. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 1, 6–9. doi: 10.5178/lebs.2010.2
20.
HuesmannL. R.GuerraN. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 408–419. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.72.2.408
21.
KiyonariT.BarclayP. (2008). Cooperation in social dilemmas: Free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 826–842. doi:10.1037/a0011381
22.
KlinA. (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: The Social Attribution Task. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 831–846. doi:10.1111/1469–7610.00671
23.
LagerspetzK.WestmanM. (1980). Moral approval of aggressive acts. A preliminary investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 6, 119–130. doi:10.1002/1098–2337(1980)6:2<119::AID-AB2480060203>3.0.CO;2-Y
24.
LevittS. D.ListJ. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174. doi:10.1257/jep.21.2.153
25.
NikiforakisN. (2008). Punishment and counter-punishment in public good games: Can we really govern ourselves?Journal of Public Economics, 92, 91–112. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.04.008
26.
NugierA.NiedenthalP. M.BrauerM.ChekrounP. (2007). Moral and angry emotions provoked by informal social control. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1699–1720. doi:10.1080/02699930601124738
ParksC. D.StoneA. B. (2010). The desire to expel unselfish members from the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 303–310. doi:10.1037/a0018403
29.
PinkerS. (2011). Decline of violence: Taming the devil within us. Nature, 478, 309–311. doi:10.1038/478309a
30.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.67.4.741
31.
RamirezJ. M. (1991). Similarities in attitudes toward interpersonal aggression in Finland, Poland, and Spain. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 737–739. doi:10.1080/00224545.1991.9924656
32.
RiméB.BoulangerB.LaubinP.RichirM.StroobantsK. (1985). The perception of inter-personal emotions originated by patterns of movement. Motivation and Emotion, 9, 241–260. doi:10.1007/BF00991830
33.
SterelnyK. (2014). Cooperation, culture and conflict. British Journal of Philosophy of Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjps/axu024
34.
StrimlingP.ErikssonK. (2014). Regulating the regulation: Norms about how people may punish each other. In van LangeP.YamagishiT.RockenbachB. (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Punishment and rewards (pp. 52–69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
VandelloJ. A.RansomS.HettingerV. E.AskewK. (2009). Men’s misperceptions about the acceptability and attractiveness of aggression. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1209–1219. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.006
36.
YamagishiT. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.51.1.110
37.
YamagishiT.HoritaY.MifuneN.HashimotoH.LiY.ShinadaM.… SimunovicD. (2012). Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 20364–20368. doi:10.1073/-pnas.1212126109
