Most studies on forgiveness and reconciliation in intergroup conflicts are conducted during the postresolution stages of conflict. The present research was conducted in the south of Israel to examine the issue of forgiveness among people currently enmeshed in active and violent conflict. Study 1 was conducted in the Israeli town of Sderot, which for more than a decade has been under frequent rocket fire from neighboring Palestinian Gaza and has also witnessed numerous Israeli retaliatory attacks on Gaza. Study 2 was conducted among residents of towns and communities close to the Gaza border during the 2014 war. We investigated the potential readiness for mutual forgiveness with Gaza residents, apology, and reparation and help to repair war damage. Mutual forgiveness received considerable support, but apology and reparations did not. Perspective-taking vis-à-vis the Palestinians predicted support for mutual forgiveness in the first but not the second study. Acceptance of moral responsibility and dismissal of exonerating cognitions regarding Israel’s conduct in Gaza predicted readiness for apology and reparations. Hence a step towards mutual forgiveness with the adversarial outgroup is feasible under active conflict mainly because it does not involve culpability.
Abu-NimerM. (2001). Conflict resolution, culture, and religion: Toward a training model of interreligious peacebuilding. Journal of Peace Research, 38, 685–704. doi:10.1177/0022343301038006003
2.
AblinJ. N.CohenH.ClauwD. J.ShalevR.AblinE.NeumannL., …BuskilaD. (2009). A tale of two cities-the effect of low intensity conflict on prevalence and characteristics of musculoskeletal pain and somatic symptoms associated with chronic stress. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 28 (Suppl 63), S15–21.
3.
AqeelM.Al-GhzawiK.KhatibR.KharmaS.NawasrehO. (2011). Frequency of post-traumatic stress disorder in children in Gaza strip. Journal of the Royal Medical Services, 18, 52–58.
4.
AuerbachY. (2005). Forgiveness and reconciliation: The religious dimension. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17, 469–485. doi:10.1080/09546550590929174
5.
BarkanE. (2001). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6.
BarkanE.KarnA. (Eds.). (2006). Taking wrongs seriously: Apologies and reconciliation. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BaronS. W. (1971). Modern nationalism and religion. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.
8.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453. doi:10.1177/0002764207302462
9.
BatsonC. D. (2014). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
10.
BatsonC. D.BurrisC. T. (1994). Personal religion: Depressant or stimulant of prejudice and discrimination. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 149–169). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
11.
BatsonC. D.ChangJ.OrrR.RowlandJ. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656–1666. doi:10.1177/014616702237647
12.
BerletC.LyonsM. N. (2000). Right-wing populism in America: Too close for comfort. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
BetzH. G. (1994). Radical right-wing populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
14.
BlatzC. W.PhilpotC. (2010). On the outcomes of intergroup apologies: A review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 995–1007. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00318.x
15.
BrownR.ČehajićS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of the effects of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684. doi:10.1002/ejsp.466
16.
CareyM. (1815). The olive branch; or, faults on both sides, federal and democratic. A serious appeal on the necessity of mutual forgiveness and harmony. Winchester, VA: J. Foster.
17.
ČehajićS.BrownR.GonzálezR. (2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729. doi:10.1177/1368430209347727
18.
ChristieD. J.TintB. S.WagnerR. V.WinterD. D. (2008). Peace psychology for a peaceful world. American Psychologist, 63, 540–552. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.540
19.
DavisM. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
20.
De GrieffP. (2008). The role of apologies in national reconciliation processes: On making trustworthy institutions trusted. In GibneyM (Ed.), The age of apology: Facing up to the past (pp. 120–134). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
21.
DiamondG. M.LipsitzJ. D.FajermanZ.RozenblatO. (2010). Ongoing traumatic stress response (OTSR) in Sderot, Israel. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 19–25. doi: 10.1037/a0017098
22.
DiamondS. (1995). Roads to dominion: Right-wing movements and political power in the United States. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23.
DecetyJ.CowellJ. M. (2014). The complex relation between morality and empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 337–339. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.008
24.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.4.872
25.
DuckittJ. (2005). Personality and prejudice. In DovidioJ.GlickP.RudmanL. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 395–412). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
26.
EisenbergN. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27.
GibneyM. (Ed.). (2008). The age of apology: Facing up to the past. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
GopinM. (2001). Forgiveness as an element of conflict resolution in religious cultures: Walking the tightrope of reconciliation and justice. In Abu-NimerM. (Ed.), Reconciliation, justice, and coexistence: Theory & practice (pp. 87–99). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
29.
GovierT. (2002). Forgiveness and revenge. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30.
HalloranM. J. (2007). Indigenous reconciliation in Australia: Do values, identity and collective guilt matter?Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 17, 1–18. doi:10.1002/casp.876
31.
HartS.HodsonW. K. (2008). The no-fault classroom: Tools to resolve conflict & foster relationship intelligence. New York, NY: Random House.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.McLernonF.NiensU.NoorM. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of ‘The Troubles’. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 193-215). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.HambergerJ.NiensU. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00441.x
35.
HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.CairnsE.TauschN.HughesJ.TamT.… PinderC. (2008). Stepping stones to reconciliation in Northern Ireland: Intergroup contact, forgiveness and trust. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 199–226). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
IbanezA.HurtadoE.LobosA.EscobarJ.Trujillo BaezS.… DecetyJ. (2011). Subliminal presentation of other faces (but not own face) primes behavioral and evoked cortical processing of empathy for pain. Brain Research, 1398, 72–85. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.05.014
37.
Kadayifci-OrellanaS. A. (2009). Ethno-religious conflicts: Exploring the role of religion in conflict resolution. In BercovitchJ.KremenyukV.ZartmanI. W. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of conflict resolution (pp. 264–280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
38.
KampfZ.LöwenheimN. (2012). Rituals of apology in the global arena. Security Dialogue, 43 (1), 43–60. doi:10.1177/0967010611431095
39.
KelmanH. C. (2004). Reconciliation as identity change: A social-psychological perspective. TovY. Siman (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 111–124). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
KimmerlingB. (1993). Patterns of militarism in Israel. European Journal of Sociology, 34, 196–223. doi:10.1017/S0003975600006640
41.
KimmerlingB. (1999). Religion, nationalism, and democracy in Israel. Constellations, 6, 339–363. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00150
42.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” state of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 125–143. doi:10.1111/josi.12007
43.
KlarYSchori-EyalN.RoccasS. (2014, June). In the aftermath of a historical group trauma: The Trauma Rooted Fan (TRF) as an analytical tool for the study of group based victimhood. A paper presented at the EASP Small Group Meeting on Collective Victimhood, Verona, Italy.
44.
LicataL.KleinO. (2010). Holocaust or benevolent paternalism? Intergenerational comparisons on collective memories and emotions about Belgium’s colonial past. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 45–57. doi: 10.1037/e507692013-001
45.
LickelB.MillerN.StenstromD. M.DensonT. F.SchmaderT. (2006). Vicarious retribution: The role of collective blame in intergroup aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 372–390. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6
46.
LiebmanC. S. (1995). Religion and democracy in Israel. Israeli Judaism: The Sociology of Religion in Israel, 7, 347–366.
47.
MaozI.McCauleyR. (2005). Psychological correlates of support for compromise: A polling study of Jewish-Israeli attitudes towards solutions to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology, 26, 791–807.
48.
McCulloughM. E.PargamentK. I.ThoresenC. E. (Eds.). (2001). Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
49.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.2.218
50.
MinowM. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
51.
MorN.WinquistJ. (2002). Self-focused attention and negative affect: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 638–662. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.638
52.
NadlerA. (2002). Post resolution processes: Instrumental and socioemotional routes to reconciliation. In SalomonG.NevoB. (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 127–141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53.
NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (2008). Intergroup reconciliation: Dimensions and themes. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 3–12). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351–374. doi:10.1177/1088868312440048
55.
PowellA. A.BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T. (2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508–521. doi:10.1177/0146167204271713
56.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2004). Exonerating cognitions, group identification, and personal values as predictors of collective guilt among Jewish-Israelis. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 130–147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.698
58.
RoslerN. (2013, July). Challenging contexts: Leaders in conflict and peace process in Northern Ireland. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Herzliya, Israel.
59.
RynholdJ. (2005). Religion, postmodernization, and Israeli approaches to the conflict with the Palestinians. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17, 371–389. doi:10.1080/09546550590929255
60.
RyeM. S.PargamentK. I.AliM. A.BeckG. L.DorffE. N.HalliseyC.WilliamsJ. G. (2000). Religious perspectives on forgiveness. In McCulloughM. E.PargamentK. I.ThoresenC. E. (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 87–99). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
61.
SanfordR. N.LevinsonD. J. (1948). Ethnocentrism in relation to some religious attitudes and practices. American Psychologist, 3, 350–351.
62.
ScheiberH. N. (2002). Taking responsibility: Moral and historical perspectives on the Japanese war-reparations issues. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 20, 233–249.
63.
ShamirM.Sagiv-SchifterT. (2006). Conflict, identity, and tolerance: Israel in the Al-Aqsa intifada. Political Psychology, 27, 569–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00523.x
64.
ShnabelN.HalabiS.NoorM. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.04.007
65.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116
66.
Siman-Tov-NachlieliI.ShnabelN. (2014). Feeling both victim and perpetrator: Investigating duality within the needs-based model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 301–314. doi: 10.1177/0146167213510746.
67.
SingerT.SeymourB.O’DohertyJ. P.StephanK. E.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469. doi:10.1038/nature04271
68.
SprinzakE. (1991). The ascendance of Israel’s radical right. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
69.
StaubE.VollhardtJ. (2008). Altruism born of suffering: The roots of caring and helping after victimization and other trauma. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 78, 267–280. doi:10.1037/a0014223
70.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136. doi:10.1177/1368430207071345
71.
TavuchisN. (1993). Mea culpa: A sociology of apology and reconciliation. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
72.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135–159. doi:10.1080/10781910802544373
73.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2014). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology. [Advance online publication]. doi:10.1111/pops.12174
74.
VollhardtJ. R.StaubE. (2011). Inclusive altruism born of suffering: The relationship between adversity and prosocial attitudes and behavior toward disadvantaged outgroups. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 81, 307–315. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2011.01099.x
75.
WilsonJ. P. (Ed.). (2013). The posttraumatic self: Restoring meaning and wholeness to personality. New York, NY: Routledge.
76.
WohlM. J.BranscombeN. R.KlarY. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37. doi:10.1080/10463280600574815
77.
WohlM. J. A.HornseyM. J.PhilpotC. R. (2011). A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and a staircase model of effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 70–100. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01026.x
78.
WohlM. J.MathesonK.BranscombeN. R.AnismanH. (2013). Victim and perpetrator groups’ responses to the Canadian government’s apology for the head tax on Chinese immigrants and the moderating influence of collective guilt. Political Psychology, 34, 713–729. doi:10.1111/pops.12017
79.
WorthingtonE. L.DiBlasioF. (1990). Promoting mutual forgiveness within the fractured relationship. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 27, 219–223. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.27.2.219
80.
WorthingtonR. (2012). Dealing with trauma as an intervention for aggression: A review of approaches and the value of reprocessing. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 4, 108–118. doi:10.1108/17596591211208319
81.
YamadaM.DecetyJ. (2009). Unconscious affective processing and empathy: An investigation of subliminal priming on the detection of painful facial expressions. The Journal of Pain, 143, 71–75. doi:10.1016/j.pain.2009.01.028
