Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The ability to differentiate individuals from their group memberships (individuation) is useful in forming impressions when social categorization fails to do so. This method is particularly valuable when encountering incongruent social category conjunctions (e.g., female bricklayer). We tested the notion that individuation is initiated when applying cognitively effortful explanatory, emergent attributes to incongruent conjunctions. Incongruent category conjunctions were more likely to be comprised of emergent attributes and individuation moderated the application of these attributes in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, individuation again moderated emergent attribute application for incongruent conjunctions, but cognitive load attenuated the relationship. Allowing or preventing the generation of attributes did not affect individuation for incongruent conjunctions in Experiment 3. This ruled out the possibility that emergent attributes cause increased individuation, but does not rule out the notion that individuation precedes such explanatory attributes. Together these findings suggest that individuating those whose category memberships clash may be applied in the effortful application of explanatory emergent attributes.

Keywords

categorization emergent attributes impression formation individuation social category conjunction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiken

L. S.

West

S. G.

(1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Asch

S. E.

Zukier

(1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230–1240. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.6.1230

Baddeley

A. D.

(1966). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for word sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 302–309. doi:10.1080/14640746608400047

Bartal

Guinote

(2002). Who exhibits more stereotypical thinking? The effect of need and ability to achieve cognitive structure on stereotyping. European Journal of Personality, 16, 313–331. doi:10.1002/per.453

Ensari

Miller

(1998). Effect of affective reactions by the out-group on preferences for crossed categorization discussion partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1503–1527. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.75.6.1503

Fiske

S. T.

Lin

Neuberg

(1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In Trope

Chaiken

(Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Fiske

S. T.

Neuberg

S. L.

(1990). A continuum of impression formation from category based to individuating process: Influences of information and motivation on attention an interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. doi:10.1016/S0065–2601(08)60317–2

Fiske

S. T.

Taylor

S. E.

(1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.

Haddock

Zanna

M. P.

Esses

V. M.

(1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes towards homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1105–1118. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.65.6.1105

10.

Hampton

J. A.

(1996). Conjunctions of visually based categories: Overextension and compensation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 378–396. doi:10.1037/0278–7393.22.2.378

11.

Hampton

J. A.

(1997). Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In Ward

T. B.

Smith

S. M.

Viad

(Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 83–110). Washington DC: American Psychological Association Press.

12.

Hastie

Schroeder

Weber

(1990). Creating complex social conjunction categories from simple categories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 242–247. doi:10.3758/BF03334016

13.

Hutter

R. R. H.

Crisp

R. J.

(2005). The composition of category conjunctions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 647–657. doi:10.1177/0146167204271575

14.

Hutter

R. R. H.

Crisp

R. J.

(2006). Implications of cognitive busyness for the perception of category conjunctions. Journal of Social Psychology, 146,253–256. doi:10.3200/SOCP.146.2.253–256

15.

Hutter

R. R. C.

Crisp

R. J.

Humphreys

G. W.

Waters

G. M.

Moffitt

(2009). The dynamics of category conjunctions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 673–686. doi:10.1177/1368430209337471

16.

Kunda

Miller

D. T.

Claire

(1990). Combining social concepts: The role of causal reasoning. Cognitive Science, 14, 551–577. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1404_3

17.

Macrae

C. N.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93–120. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.93

18.

Macrae

C. N.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2001). Social cognition: Categorical person perception. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 239–255. doi:10.1348/000712601162059

19.

Meyers-Levy

Sternthal

(1991). Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 4–96. doi:10.2307/3172728

20.

Neuberg

S. L.

Newsom

J. T.

(1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simple structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 113–131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113

21.

Quadflieg

Flannigan

Waiter

G. D.

Rossion

Wig

Turk

D. J.

Macrae

(2011). Stereotype-based modulation of person perception. Neuroimage, 57, 549–557. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.004

22.

Siebler

(2008). Emergent attributes in person perception: A comparative test of response time predictions. Social Psychology, 39, 83–89. doi:10.1027/1864–9335.39.2.83

23.

Thompson

M. M.

Naccarato

M. E.

Parker

K. E.

(1989, June). Assessing cognitive need: The development of the personal need for structure and the personal fear of invalidity scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Halifax, Canada.

24.

Health Resources and Services Administration (2010). The registered nurse population: Findings from the 2008 national sample survey of registered nurses. Retrieved from http://bhpr.hrsa.gov/healthworkforce/rnsurveys/rnsurveyfinal.pdf

Applying individuation to conflicting social categories

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References