One of the largest Middle East coexistence programs annually brings together Israeli and Palestinian teenagers for a 3-week camp in the United States. For 3 years, we longitudinally tracked how this intervention affected Israelis’ and Palestinians’ relationships with, and attitudes toward, each other. Specifically, we measured participants’ outgroup attitudes immediately before and after camp, and, for 2 years, 9 months following “reentry” to their home countries. In all 3 years, participants’ attitudes toward the outgroup improved from precamp to postcamp. Participants who formed an outgroup friendship during camp developed more positive feelings toward outgroup campers, which generalized to an increase in positivity toward all outgroup members. Although the positivity faded upon campers’ reentry, there was significant residual positivity after reentry compared to precamp. Finally, positivity toward the outgroup after reentry was also predicted by outgroup friendships. Future contact interventions may profit from encouraging individuals to make and maintain outgroup friendships.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Al RamiahA.HewstoneM. (2011). Rallying around the flag: Can an intergroup contact intervention promote national unity?British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 239–256. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02041.x
3.
Al RamiahA.HewstoneM.LittleT. D.LangK. (2013). The influence of status on the relationship between inter-group contact, threat, and prejudice in the context of a nation-building intervention in Malaysia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 1–28. doi:10.1177/0022002713492634
4.
Bar-NatanI. (2005). Meeting between adversaries: Does liking the other individuals generalize to their groups? (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Haifa, Israel [Hebrew].
5.
Bar-TalD.AntebiD. (1992). Beliefs about negative intentions of the world: A study of the Israeli siege mentality. Political Psychology, 13, 633–645. doi:10.2307/3791494
6.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.LeyensJ. P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. doi:10.1037/a0013470
7.
BrownR.EllerA.LeedsS.StaceK. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 692–703. doi:10.1002/ejsp.384
8.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
9.
CameronL.RutlandA. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice towards the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469–488. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00469.x
10.
ChristO.HewstoneM.TauschN.WagnerU.VociA.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2010). Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: Cross-sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, and attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1662–1674. doi:10.1177/0146167210386969
11.
ChristO.SchmidK.LolliotS.SwartJ.StolleD.TauschN.…HewstoneM. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320901111
12.
CookS. W. (1962). The systematic analysis of socially significant events: A strategy for social research. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 66–84. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1962.tb02201.x
13.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
14.
DhontK.van HielA.De BolleM.RoetsA. (2012). Longitudinal intergroup contact effects on prejudice using self- and observer-reports. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 221–238. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02039.x
15.
DuncanJ. G.BoisjolyJ.LevyD. M.KremerM.EcclesJ. (2003). Empathy or antipathy? The consequences of racially and socially diverse peers on attitudes and behaviors. Working Paper, Institute of Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
16.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2003). “Gringos” in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 55–75. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001012
17.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2004). Come together: Longitudinal comparisons of Pettigrew’s reformulated intergroup contact model and the common ingroup identity model in Anglo-French and Mexican-American contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 229–256. doi:10.1002/ejsp.194
18.
EllerA.AbramsD.GómezA. (2012). When the direct route is blocked: The extended contact pathway to improving intergroup relations. International Journal of Intercultural relations, 36, 637–646. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.03.005
19.
EnosR. D. (2014). Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1317670111
20.
FurutoS. B.FurutoD. M. (1983). The effects of affective and cognitive treatment on attitude change toward ethnic minority groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 7, 149–165. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(83)90018-4
21.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 784, 708–724. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
22.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
23.
GreenD. P.WongJ. S. (2009). Tolerance and the contact hypothesis: A field experiment. In BorgidaE. (Ed.), The political psychology of democratic citizenship (pp. 1–23). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
GreenlandK.BrownR. (1999). Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 503–522. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199906)29:4<503::AID-EJSP941>3.0.CO;2-Y
25.
HammackP. L. (2006). Identity, conflict, and coexistence: Life stories of Israeli and Palestinian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 323–369. doi:10.1177/0743558406289745
26.
HaringT. G.BreenC.Pitts-ConwayV.LeeM. (1987). Adolescent peer tutoring and special friend experiences. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 280–286. doi:10.1177/154079698701200404
27.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrated review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
28.
HusseisiR. (2009). The relationshp between legitimizing the adversary’s collective narrative and adherence to one’s own narrative as a function of participation in a peace education program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Haifa, Israel [Hebrew].
29.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived outgroup variability, and outgroup attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700–710. doi:10.1177/0146167293196005
30.
KelmanH. C. (1978). Israelis and Palestinians: Psychological prerequisites for mutual acceptance. International Security, 3, 162–186. doi:10.2307/2626648
31.
LazarusN. (2011). Evaluating peace education in the Oslo-Intifada generation: A long-term impact study of Seeds of Peace 1993–2010 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). American University, Washington, DC.
32.
LazarusN. (2014). Evaluating Seeds of Peace: Assessing long-term impact in volatile context. In WislerA.del FeliceC. (Eds.), Peace education evaluation. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
33.
LevinS.van LaarC.SidaniusJ. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76–92. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001013
34.
Maddy-WeitzmanE. (2005). Waging peace in the Holy Land: A qualitative study of Seeds of Peace 1993–2004 (Doctoral dissertation). Boston University, MA, USA.
35.
MalhotraD.LiyanageS. (2005). Long-term effects of peace workshops in protracted conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49, 908–924. doi:10.1177/0022002705281153
36.
MaozI.McCauleyC.(2008). Threat, dehumanization and support for retaliatory-aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(1), 93–116. doi:10.1177/0022002707308597
37.
MareninO. (1989). Implementing national unity: Changes in national consciousness among participants in the National Youth Service Corps of Nigeria. Journal of Ethnic Studies, 17, 23–44.
38.
MillerN. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387–410. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00267
PaluckE. L.GreenD. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. The Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339–367. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607
41.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173–185. doi:10.1177/0146167297232006
42.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
43.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
44.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2011). Intergroup contact as one of many predictors of prejudice. In PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (Eds.), When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact (Essays in social psychology) (pp. 145–160). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
45.
RosenY. (2006). The effects of peace education programs on changing central versus peripheral attitudes and beliefs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Haifa, Israel [Hebrew].
46.
RouhanaN. N.FiskeS. T. (1995). Perception of power, threat, and conflict intensity in asymmetric intergroup conflict: Arab and Jewish citizens of Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 49–81. doi:10.1177/0022002795039001003
47.
SheareJ. B. (1974). Social acceptance of EMR adolescents in integrated programs. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 78, 678–682.
48.
ShlaimA. (1996). The Middle East: The origins of Arab–Israeli wars. In WoodsN. (Ed.), Explaining international relations since 1945 (pp. 219–240). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L. (2003). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In McNattD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
50.
StephanW. G.StephanW. G. (1984). The role of ignorance in intergroup relations. In MillerN.BrewerM. B. (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 229–255). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
51.
StephanW. G.StephanW. G. (1985). Integroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1985.tb01134.x
52.
StephanW. G.StephanW. G. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In OskampS. (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
53.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/a0024450
54.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136. doi:10.1177/1368430207071345
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.ChristO. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 212–255). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
58.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of intergroup friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.73
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
