The high prevalence of violent offending amongst gang-involved youth has been established in the literature. Yet the underlying psychological mechanisms that enable youth to engage in such acts of violence remain unclear. One hundred eighty-nine young people were recruited from areas in London, UK, known for their gang activity. We found that gang members, in comparison to nongang youth, described the groups they belong to as having recognized leaders, specific rules and codes, initiation rituals, and special clothing. Gang members were also more likely than nongang youth to engage in violent behavior and endorse moral disengagement strategies (i.e., moral justification, euphemistic language, advantageous comparison, displacement of responsibility, attribution of blame, and dehumanization). Finally, we found that dehumanizing victims partially mediated the relationship between gang membership and violent behavior. These findings highlight the effects of groups at the individual level and an underlying psychological mechanism that explains, in part, how gang members engage in violence.
AlleyneE.WoodJ. L. (2010). Gang involvement: Psychological and behavioral characteristics of gang members, peripheral youth and non-gang youth. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 423–436. doi:10.1002/ab.20360
2.
AlleyneE.WoodJ. L. (2013). Gang-related crime: The social, psychological and behavioral correlates. Psychology, Crime and Law, 19, 611–627. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2012.658050
3.
AndersonE. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence and the moral life of the inner city. New York, NY: Norton and Company.
4.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BanduraA. (1990). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.1990.tb00270.x
6.
BanduraA. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31, 101–119. doi:10.1080/0305724022014322
7.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.71.2.364
8.
BanduraA.UnderwoodB.FromsonM. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253–269. doi:10.1016/0092–6566(75)90001-X
9.
BattinS. R.HillK. G.AbbottR. D.CatalanoR. F.HawkinsJ. D. (1998). The contribution of gang membership to delinquency beyond delinquent friends. Criminology, 36, 93–115. doi:10.1111/j.1745–9145.1998.tb01241.x
10.
BennettT.HollowayK. (2004). Gang membership, drugs and crime in the UK. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 305–323. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh025
11.
BullockK.TilleyN. (2008). Understanding and tackling gang violence. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 10, 36–47. doi:10.1057/palgrave.cpcs.8150057
12.
CastanoE.Giner-SorollaR. (2006). Not quite human: Infrahumanization in response to collective responsibility for intergroup killing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 804–818. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.90.5.804
13.
CastanoE.KoftaM. (2009). Dehumanization: Humanity and its denial. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 695–697. doi:10.1177/1368430209350265
14.
ČehajićS.BrownR.GonzálezR. (2009). What do I care? Perceived ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729. doi:10.1177/1368430209347727
15.
ChanD. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In LanceC. E.VandenbergR. J. (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in organizational and social sciences (pp. 309–336). Hove, UK: Routledge, Taylor Francis Group.
16.
CoaleyK. (2014). An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
17.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.78.1.98
18.
DeckerS. (1996). Collective and normative features of gang violence. Justice Quarterly, 13, 243–264. doi:10.1080/07418829600092931
19.
DeckerS. H.van WinkleB. (1996). Life in the gang: Family, friends, and violence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
20.
DensleyJ. (2013). How gangs work: An ethnography of youth violence. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
DukesR. L.MartinezR. O.SteinJ. A. (1997). Precursors and consequences of membership in youth gangs. Youth and Society, 29, 139–165. doi:10.1177/0044118X97029002001
22.
DunnT. J.BaguleyT.BrunsdenV. (2013). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046
23.
ElliottD. S.RhinehartM. (1995). Moral disengagement, delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.
24.
EmlerN.ReicherS. (1995). Adolescence and delinquency. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
25.
EsbensenF.-A.DeschenesE. P.WinfreeL. T. (1999). Differences between gang girls and gang boys: Results from a multisite survey. Youth and Society, 31, 27–53. doi:10.1177/0044118X99031001002
26.
EsbensenF.-A.HuizingaD. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31, 565–589. doi:10.1111/j.1745–9125.1993.tb01142.x
27.
EsbensenF.-A.WeermanF. M. (2005). Youth gangs and troublesome youth groups in the United States and the Netherlands: A cross-national comparison. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 5–37. doi:10.1177/147737080548626
28.
GilesH.JohnsonP. (1987). Ethnolinguistic identity theory: A social psychological approach to language maintenance. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 68, 69–99. doi:10.1515/ijsl.1987.68.69
29.
Giner-SorollaR.LeidnerB.CastanoE. (2012). Dehumanization, demonization, and morality shifting: Paths to moral certainty in extremist violence. In HoggM. A.BlaylockD. L. (Eds.), Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty (pp. 165–182). Chichester, UK: Blackwell.
30.
GoldmanL.GilesH.HoggM. A. (2014). Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. 17(6), 813–832. doi:10.1177/1368430214524289
31.
GulloneE. (2012). Animal cruelty, antisocial behaviour and aggression: More than a link. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
32.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
33.
HaslamN. (2014). What is dehumanization? In BainP. G.VaesJ.LeyensJ.-P. (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 34–48). Hove, UK: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis.
34.
Home Office. (2007). Crime in England and Wales 2006/07. London, UK: Author.
35.
Home Office. (2008). Tackling gangs: A practical guide for local authorities, CDRPS and other local partners. London, UK: Author.
36.
Home Office. (2011). Crime in England and Wales 2010/11. London, UK: Author.
37.
HydeL. W.ShawD. S.MoilanenK. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 197–209. doi:10.1007/s10802–009–9358–5
38.
KleinM. W. (1996). Gangs in the United States and Europe. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 4, 63–80. doi:10.1007/BF02731602
39.
KleinM. W. (2006). The value of comparisons in street gang research. In ShortJ. F.HughesL. A. (Eds.), Studying youth gangs (pp. 129–144). Oxford, UK: AltaMira Press.
40.
KleinM. W.KernerH.-J.MaxsonC. L.WeitekampE. G. M. (Eds.). (2001). The Eurogang paradox: Street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
41.
KleinM. W.MaxsonC. L. (2006). Street gang patterns and policies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
KleinM. W.WeermanF. M.ThornberryT. P. (2006). Street gang violence in Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 3, 413–437. doi:10.1177/1477370806067911
43.
KlineP. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
44.
MaresD. (2001). Gangstas or lager louts? Working class street gangs in Manchester. In KleinM. W.KernerH.-J.MaxsonC. L.WeitekampE. G. M. (Eds.), The Eurogang paradox: Street gangs and youth groups in the U.S. and Europe (pp. 153–164). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
45.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. London, UK: Tavistock.
46.
MillerJ. (2001). One of the guys: Girls, gangs, and gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
48.
RudmanL. A.MescherK. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and male sexual aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746. doi:10.1177/0146167212436401
ShulmanE. P.CauffmanE.PiqueroA.FaganJ. (2011). Moral disengagement among serious juvenile offenders: A longitudinal study of the relations between moral cognition and offending. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1619–1632. doi:10.1037/a0025404
51.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52.
SivarajasingamV.WellsJ. P.MooreS.MorganP.ShepherdJ. P. (2011). Violence in England and Wales in 2010: An accident and emergency perspective. Cardiff, UK: Cardiff University.
SouthR.WoodJ. (2006). Bullying in prisons: The importance of perceived social status, prisonization and moral disengagement. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 490–501. doi:10.1002/ab.20149
55.
StaubE. (2005). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SykesG.MatzaD. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670. doi:10.2307/2089195
57.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
58.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SmithC. A.TobinK. (2003). Gangs and delinquency in developmental perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
TitaG.RidgewayG. (2007). The impact of gang formation on local patterns of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 208–237. doi:10.1177/0022427806298356
60.
VigilD. V. (1988). Barrio gangs: Street life and identity in Southern California. Austin: University of Texas Press.
61.
VikiG. T.OsgoodD.PhillipsS. (2013). Dehumanization and self-reported proclivity to torture prisoners of war. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 325–328. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.11.006
62.
WeermanF. M.MaxsonC. L.EsbensenF.AldridgeJ.MedinaJ.van GemertF. (2009). Eurogang program manual background, development, and use of the Eurogang instruments in multi-site, multi-method comparative research. Retrieved from http://www.umsl.edu/ccj/Eurogang/pdf/Youth%20Survey.pdf
63.
WoodJ. L.AlleyneE. (2010). Street gang theory and research: Where are we now and where do we go from here?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 100–111. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.005
64.
WoodJ. L.AlleyneE.MozovaK.JamesM. (2013). Predicting involvement in prison gang activity: Street gang membership, social and psychological factors. Law and Human Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/lhb0000053
65.
WoodJ.MoirA.JamesM. (2009). Prisoners’ gang-related activity: The importance of bullying and moral disengagement. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 15, 569–581. doi:10.1080/10683160802427786
66.
YoungT.FitzgeraldM.HallsworthS.JosephI. (2007). Groups, gangs and weapons. London, UK: Youth Justice Board of England and Wales.
