This study investigates the role of team-based reward leadership in regard to team performance by considering the mediating role of team commitment and the moderating effect of abusive supervision. Using a multisource approach, data was gathered from 381 members and 101 immediate supervisors (which represents 101 work teams) in a public safety organization. Results of path analyses show that the relationship between team-based reward leadership and team performance is mediated by team commitment. Moreover, results of hierarchical regression analyses indicate that the relationship between team-based reward leadership and team commitment is moderated by abusive supervision, such that this relationship is stronger when the level of abusive supervision is low. On the whole, the findings of this study help to better understand why and when team-based reward leadership may enhance team performance.
AguinisH.GottfredsonR. K.JooH. (2012). Delivering effective performance feedback: The strengths-based approach. Business Horizons, 55, 105–111. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.10.004
2.
AimeF.MeyerC. J.HumphreyS. E. (2010). Legitimacy of team rewards: Analyzing legitimacy as a condition for the effectiveness of team incentive designs. Journal of Business Research, 63, 60–66. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.014
3.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2010). IBM SPSS® Amos™ 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.
4.
AryeeS.ChenZ. X.SunL. Y.DebrahY. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191–201. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.92.1.191
5.
AshforthB. E.MaelF. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999
6.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J.JungD. I.BersonY. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 207–218. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.88.2.207
7.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. doi:10.1037//1089–2680.5.4.323
8.
BeersmaB.HollenbeckJ. R.HumphreyS. E.MoonH.ConlonD. E.IlgenD. R. (2003). Cooperation, competition, and team performance: Toward a contingency approach. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 572–590. doi:10.2307/30040650
9.
BishopJ. W.ScottK. D. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 439–450. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.85.3.439
10.
BishopJ. W.ScottK. D.BurroughsS. M. (2000). Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management, 26, 1113–1132. doi:10.1177/014920630002600603
11.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol.2 (pp. 389–444). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
BurkeC. S.StaglK. C.KleinC.GoodwinG. F.SalasE.HalpinS. M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288–307. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.007
14.
BurnhamK. P.AndersonD. R. (2004). Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 261–304. doi:10.1177/0049124104268644
15.
CacioppeR. (1999). Using team–individual reward and recognition strategies to drive organizational success. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20, 322–331. doi:10.1108/01437739910292634
16.
CasimirG.NgY. N. K. (2010). Combinative aspects of leadership style and the interaction between leadership behaviors. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 31, 501–517. doi:10.1108/01437731011070005
17.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234–246. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.83.2.234
18.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
CummingsJ. N.HaasM. R. (2012). So many teams, so little time: Time allocation matters in geographically dispersed teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 316–341. doi:10.1002/job.777
20.
CurralL. A.ForresterR. H.DawsonJ. F.WestM. A. (2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 187–204. doi:10.1080/13594320143000627
21.
De JongB. A.ElfringT. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 535–549. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.51468649
22.
DuffyM. K.GansterD.PagonM. (2002). Social undermining and social support in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351. doi:10.2307/3069350
23.
EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. L. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1–22. doi:10.1037/1082–989X.12.1.1
24.
EllemersN.De GilderD.HaslamS. A. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459–478. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.13670967
25.
GarbersY.KonradtU. (2013). The effect of financial incentives on performance: A quantitative review of individual and team-based financial incentives. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 102–137. doi:10.1111/joop.12039
26.
GeorgeJ. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107–116. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.75.2.107
27.
GriffithT. L.SawyerJ. E. (2010). Multilevel knowledge and team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1003–1031. doi:10.1002/job.660
28.
HackmanJ. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In LorschJ. W. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
HarrisK. J.KacmarK. M.ZivnuskaS. (2007). An investigation of abusive supervision as a predictor of performance and the meaning of work as a moderator of the relationship. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 252–263. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.03.007
30.
HerseyP.BlanchardK. H. (1969). Life cycle theory of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 23, 26–35.
31.
HertelG.KonradtU.OrlikowskiB. (2004). Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 1–28. doi:10.1080/13594320344000228
32.
HoggM. A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1
33.
HoggM. A.van KnippenbergD.RastD. E.III. (2012). The social identity theory of leadership: Theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. European Review of Social Psychology, 23, 258–304. doi:10.1080/10463283.2012.741134
34.
HomanA. C.GreerL. L. (2013). Considering diversity: The positive effects of considerate leadership in diverse teams. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 105–125. doi:10.1177/1368430212437798
35.
HouseR. J. (1971). A path–goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–338. doi:10.2307/2391905
36.
HowellJ. M.AvolioB. J. (1993). Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 891–902. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.78.6.891
37.
HuangJ. W. (2013). The effects of transformational leadership on the distinct aspects development of social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 87–104. doi:10.1177/1368430212454926
38.
HuangR.KahaiS.JesticeR. (2010). The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1098–1110. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.014
39.
IlgenD. R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications. American Psychologist, 54, 129–139. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.54.2.129
40.
JacksonE. M.RossiM. E.HooverE. R.JohnsonR. E. (2012). Relationships of leader reward behavior with employee behavior: Fairness and morale as key mediators. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33, 646–661. doi:10.1108/01437731211265232
41.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.69.1.85
42.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.78.2.306
43.
KerrS.JermierJ. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023-5
44.
KirkmanB. L.RosenB. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 58–74. doi:10.2307/256874
45.
KleinH. J.MolloyJ. C.BrinsfieldC. T. (2012). Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of Management Review, 37, 130–151. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0018
46.
KozlowskiS. W. J.KleinK. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emerging processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
47.
LangfredC. W. (2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 385–399. doi:10.2307/20159588
48.
LinC. P. (2011). Modeling job effectiveness and its antecedents from a social capital perspective: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 915–923. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.017
49.
LiuJ.LiuX.ZengX. (2011). Does transactional leadership count for team innovativeness? The moderating role of emotional labor and the mediating role of team efficacy. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 282–298. doi:10.1108/09534811111132695
50.
LuthansF.StajkovicA. D. (2009). Provide recognition for performance improvement. In LockeE. A. (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 239–253). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51.
MathieuJ. E.ChenG. (2011). The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37, 610–641. doi:10.1177/0149206310364663
52.
MichelJ. W.LyonsB. D.ChoJ. (2011). Is the full-range model of leadership really a full-range model of effective leader behavior?Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 18, 493–507. doi:10.1177/1548051810377764
53.
Miron-SpektorE.ErezM.NavehE. (2011). The effect of conformists and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740–760. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870100
54.
MowdayRSteersR.PorterL. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247. doi:10.1016/0001–8791(79)90072–1
55.
MuellerJ. S. (2012). Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 111–124. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.08.004.
56.
MullenJ.KellowayE. K.TeedM. (2011). Inconsistent style of leadership as a predictor of safety behaviour. Work & Stress, 25, 41–54. doi:10.1080/02678373.2011.569200
57.
NeiningerA.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.KauffeldS.HenschelA. (2010). Effects of team and organizational commitment – A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76, 567–579. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2010.01.009
58.
OstroffC. (1993). Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 569–582. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.78.4.569
59.
PearceC. L.HerbikP. A. (2004). Citizenship behavior at the team level of analysis: The effects of team leadership, team commitment, perceived team support, and team size. The Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 293–310. doi:10.3200/SOCP.144.3.293–310
60.
PearsallM. J.ChristianM. S.EllisA. P. J. (2010). Motivating interdependent teams: Individuals rewards, shared rewards, or something in between?Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 183–191. doi:10.1037/a0017593
61.
PetersonS. J.LuthansF. (2006). The impact of financial and nonfinancial incentives on business-unit outcomes over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 156–165. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.91.1.156
62.
PodsakoffP. M.BommerW. H.PodsakoffN. P.MacKenzieS. B. (2006). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 113–142. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.09.002
63.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.88.5.879
64.
PodsakoffN. P.PodsakoffP. M.KuskovaV. V. (2010). Dispelling misconceptions and providing guidelines for leader reward and punishment behavior. Business Horizon, 53, 291–303. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.01.003
65.
PodsakoffP. M.TodorW. D.GroverR. A.HuberV. L. (1984). Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: Fact of fiction?Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 21–63. doi:10.1016/0030–5073(84)90036–9
66.
PorterC. O. L. H. (2005). Goal orientation: Effects on backing up behavior, performance, efficacy, and commitment in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 811–818. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.90.4.811
67.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
68.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi:10.1080/00273170701341316
69.
RaffertyA. E.GriffinM. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 329–354. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.02.009
70.
RaffertyA. E.RestubogS. L. D. (2011). The influence of abusive supervisors on followers’ organizational citizenship behaviours: The hidden costs of abusive supervision. British Journal of Management, 22, 270–285. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8551.2010.00732.x
71.
RousseauV.AubéC. (2010). Team self-managing behaviors and team effectiveness: The moderating effect of task routineness. Group & Organization Management, 35, 751–781. doi:10.1177/1059601110390835
72.
RubinR. S.BommerW. H.BachrachD. G. (2010). Operant leadership and employee citizenship: A question of trust?The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 400–408. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.03.005
73.
RynesS. L.GerhartB.ParksL. (2005). Performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 571–600. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254
74.
SchaubroeckJ.LamS. S. K.PengA. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 863–871. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.92.4.1020
75.
SchillingJ. (2007). Leaders’ romantic conceptions of the consequences of leadership. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 602–623. doi:10.1111/j.1464–0597.2007.00306.x
76.
StinglhamberF.VandenbergheC. (2003). Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 251–270. doi:10.1002/job.192
77.
SunL. Y.ZhangZ.QiJ.ChenZ. X. (2012). Empowerment and creativity: A cross-level investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.005
78.
SundstromE.DeMeuseK. P.FutrellD. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120–133. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.45.2.120
79.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
80.
TepperB. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190. doi:10.2307/1556375
81.
TepperB. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289. doi:10.1177/0149206307300812
82.
ThomasG.MartinR.RiggioR. E. (2013). Leading groups: Leadership as a group process. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16, 3–16. doi:10.1177/1368430212462497
83.
TjosvoldD.HuiC.YuZ. (2003). Conflict management and task reflexivity for team in-role and extra-role performance in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14, 141–163. doi:10.1108/eb022895
84.
TylerT. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. In SuttonR. I.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 201–246). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
85.
Unger-AviramE.ZwikaelO.RestubogS. L. D. (2013). Revisiting goals, feedback, recognition, and performance: The case of project teams. Group & Organization Management, 38, 570–600. doi:10.1177/1059601113500142
86.
Van MierloH.RutteC. G.KompierM. A. J.DoorewaardH. A. C. M. (2005). Self-managing teamwork and psychological well-being: Review of a multilevel research domain. Group & Organization Management, 30, 211–235. doi:10.1177/1059601103257989
87.
WagemanR. (1995). Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 145–180. doi:10.2307/2393703
88.
WalumbwaF. O.WuC.OrwaB. (2008). Contingent reward transactional leadership, work attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of procedural justice climate perceptions and strength. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 251–265. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.03.004
89.
WangX. H.HowellJ. M. (2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 775–790. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001
90.
WayneS. J.ShoreL. M.BommerW. H.TetrickL. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in perceptions of organizational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 590–598. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.87.3.590
91.
WheelanS. A. (2009). Group size, group development, and group productivity. Small Group Research, 40, 247–262. doi:10.1177/1046496408328703
92.
YuklG. (2012). Effective leadership behaviors: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26, 66–85. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0088
93.
YuklG.GordonA.TaberT. (2002). A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 9, 15–32. doi:10.1177/107179190200900102
94.
ZoharD.Tenne-GazitO. (2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 744–757. doi:10.1037/0021–9010.93.4.744
