Four experiments in the context of the Armenian Genocide (Study 1), the Kielce Pogrom (Study 2), and the Holocaust (Studies 3 and 4) examined the effects of experiencing acknowledgment (vs. lack of acknowledgment) of historical ingroup victimization on psychological well-being and on intergroup relations. Armenian and Jewish American participants, respectively, read about the former perpetrator group’s acknowledgment or lack of acknowledgment of the ingroup’s victimization. Participants in the acknowledgment condition reported higher levels of psychological well-being (indicated by more positive and less negative affect) and greater willingness to reconcile with the former perpetrator group, compared to participants in the no acknowledgment condition and to a neutral baseline control condition (Study 4). Two studies also revealed significant effects on resentment of the perpetrator group.
AjdukovicD.Corkalo BiruskiD. (2008). Caught between the ethnic sides: Inter-ethnic relations of children and parents in the post-war community. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 337–347. doi:10.1177/0165025408090975
2.
AkçamT. (2012). The Young Turks’ crime against humanity: The Armenian Genocide and ethnic cleansing in the Armenian empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
Alarcón-HenríquezA.LicataL.LeysC.van der LindenN.KleinO.MercyA. (2010). Recognition of shared past sufferings, trust and improving intergroup attitudes in Belgium. Revista de Psicología, 28, 81–110. Retrieved from http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/431
4.
AuerbachY. (2009). The reconciliation pyramid—A narrative-based framework for analyzing identity conflicts. Political Psychology, 30, 291–318. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2008.00692.x
5.
Azarian-CeccatoN. (2010). Reverberations of the Armenian Genocide: Narrative’s intergenerational transmission and the task of not forgetting. Narrative Inquiry, 20, 106–123. doi:10.1075/ni.20.1.06aza
6.
BakalianA. P. (1993). Armenian Americans: From being to feeling Armenian. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
7.
Bar-OnD.KassemF. (2004). Storytelling as a way to work through intractable conflicts: The German–Jewish experience and its relevance to the Palestinian–Israeli context. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 289–306. doi:10.1111/j.0022–4537.2004.00112.x
8.
Bar-TalD.Chernyak-HaiL.SchoriN.GundarA. (2009). A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. International Review of the Red Cross, 91, 229–258. doi:10.1017/S1816383109990221
9.
BilaliR.TroppL. R.DasguptaN. (2012). Attributions of responsibility and perceived harm in the aftermath of mass violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18, 21–39. doi:10.1037/a0026671
10.
BlatzC. W.SchumannK.RossM. (2009). Government apologies for historical injustices. Political Psychology, 30, 219–241. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2008.00689.x
11.
BrownR. P.WohlM. J. A.ExlineJ. J. (2008). Taking up offenses: Second-hand forgiveness and identification with targets of transgressions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1406–1419. doi:10.1177/0146167208321538
12.
ČehajićS.BrownR. (2010). Silencing the past. Effects of intergroup contact on acknowledgment of in-group responsibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 190–196. doi:10.1177/1948550609359088
13.
Čehajić-ClancyS.EffronD. A.HalperinE.LibermanV.RossL. D. (2011). Affirmation, acknowledgment of in-group responsibility, group-based guilt, and support for reparative measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 256–270. doi:10.1037/a0023936
14.
ChapmanA. R. (2007). Truth commissions and intergroup forgiveness: The case of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 51–69. doi:10.1037/h0094024
15.
CohenS. (2001). States of denial. Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
16.
ContradaR. J.AshmoreR. D.GaryM. L.CoupsE.EgethJ. D.SewellA.… ChasseV. (2000). Ethnicity-related sources of stress and their effects on well-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 136–139. doi:10.1111/1467–8721.00078
17.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929. doi:10.1177/0146167206287721
18.
DavidR.ChoiS. Y. P. (2009). Getting even or getting equal? Retributive desires and transnational justice. Political Psychology, 30, 161–192. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9221.2008.00687.x
19.
DienerE. (2012). New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. American Psychologist, 67, 590–597. doi:10.1037/a0029541
20.
FloresN. M.HuoY. J. (2013). “We” are not all alike: Consequences of neglecting national origin identities among Asians and Latinos. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 143–150. doi:10.1177/1948550612449025
21.
ForstmeierS.KuwertP.SpitzerC.FreybergerH. J.MaerckerA. (2009). Post-traumatic growth, social acknowledgment as survivors, and sense of coherence in former German child soldiers of World War II. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17, 1030–1039. doi:10.5167/uzh-26083
22.
GreeneD. M. (2007). The Holocaust as recurring reality: Victimization themes and Jewish American ethnic identity formation. Sociological Spectrum, 27, 275–298. doi:10.1080/02732170701215941
23.
GrossJ. T. (2006). Fear. Anti-Semitism in Poland after Auschwitz. New York, NY: Random House.
24.
HamberB. (2007). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Paradise lost or pragmatism?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 13, 115–125. doi:10.1037/h0094027
25.
HektnerJ. M.SchmidtJ. A.CsikszentmihalyiM. (Eds.). (2006). Experience sampling method: Measuring the quality of everyday life. London, UK: Sage.
26.
HicksD.WeisbergW. (2004). Extending the interactive problem-solving method: Addressing multiple levels of conflict, unacknowledged trauma, and responsibility. In EaglyA. H.BaronR. M.HamiltonV. L. (Eds.), The social psychology of group identity and social conflict: Theory, application, and practice (pp. 151–172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
HovannisianR. G. (1998). Remembrance and denial: The case of the Armenian Genocide. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
28.
KalayjianA.ShahinianS. P.GergerianE. L.SaraydarianL. (1996). Coping with Ottoman Turkish genocide: An exploration of the experience of Armenian survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress,9, 87–97. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090108
29.
KamińskiŁ.ŻarynJ. (Eds.). (2006). Reflections on the Kielce Pogrom. Warsaw, Poland: Institute of National Remembrance.
30.
KaufmanD. (2007). Post-memory and post-Holocaust Jewish identity narratives. In GersonJ. M.WolfD. L. (Eds.), Sociology confronts the Holocaust. Memories and identities in Jewish diasporas (pp. 39–54). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
KobauR.SniezekJ.ZackM. M.LucasR. E.BurnsA. (2010). Well-being assessment: An evaluation of well-being scales for public health and population estimates of well-being among US adults. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 2, 272–297. doi:10.1111/j.1758–0854.2010.01035
33.
KosicA.TauberC. D. (2010). Promoting reconciliation through youth: Cross-community initiatives in Vukovar, Croatia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 16, 81–95. doi:10.1080/10781910903487050
34.
LambourneW. (2009). Transitional justice and peace building after mass violence. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3, 28–48. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijn037
35.
LassonK. (2007). Defending truth: Legal and psychological aspects of Holocaust denial. Current Psychology, 26, 223–266. doi:10.1007/s12144–007–9013–7
36.
LeachC. W.Bou ZeineddineF.Čehajić-ClancyS. (2013). Moral immemorial: The rarity of self-criticism for previous generations’ genocide or mass violence. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 34–53. doi:10.1111/josi.12002
LiebkindK.Jasinskaja-LahtiI. (2000). The influence of experiences of discrimination on psychological stress: A comparison of seven immigrant groups. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 1–16. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099–1298(200001/02)10:1<1::AID-CASP521>3.0.CO;2–5
39.
LukasR. (1997). The forgotten Holocaust: The Poles under German occupation 1939–1944. New York, NY: Hippocrene Books.
40.
MaerckerA.MüllerJ. (2004). Social acknowledgement as a victim or survivor: A scale to measure a recovery factor of PTSD. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17, 345–351. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000038484.15488.3d
41.
MaerckerA.PovilonyteM.LianovaR.PöhlmannK. (2009). Is acknowledgement of trauma a protective factor? The sample case of refugees from Chechnya. European Psychologist, 14, 249–254. doi:10.1027/1016–9040.14.3.249
42.
MillerT. Q.SmithT. W.TurnerC. W.GuijarroM. L.HalletA. J. (1996). A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 322–348. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.119.2.322
43.
MinowM. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness. Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
44.
MoshmanD. (2007). Us and them: Identity and genocide. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 7, 115–135. doi:10.1080/15283480701326034
45.
PascoeE. A.RichmanL. S. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 531–554. doi:10.1037/a0016059
46.
PeckJ. M. (2006). Being Jewish in the New Germany. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
47.
PhilpotC.HornseyM. J. (2008). What happens when groups say sorry: The effect of intergroup apologies on their recipients. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 474–487. doi:10.1177/0146167207311283
48.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.94.1.116
49.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.UllrichJ.DovidioJ. F.CarmiD. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021–1030. doi:10.1177/0146167209336610
StaubE. (2008). Promoting reconciliation after genocide and mass killing in Rwanda—and other postconflict settings: Understanding the roots of violence, healing, shared history, and general principles. In NadlerA.MalloyT.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup reconciliation (pp. 395–422). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
52.
SwimJ. K.JohnstonK.PearsonN. B. (2009). Daily experiences with heterosexism: Relations between heterosexist hassles and psychological well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 28, 597–629. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.5.597
TernonY. (1998). Freedom and responsibility of the historian. In HovannisianR. G. (Ed.), Remembrance and denial: The case of the Armenian Genocide (pp. 237–248). Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
Van IjzendoornM. H.Bakermans-KranenburgM. J.Sagi-SchwartzA. (2003). Are children of Holocaust survivors less well-adapted? A meta-analytic investigation of secondary traumatization. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 459–469. doi:10.1023/A:1025706427300
57.
VollhardtJ. R. (2012). Collective victimization. In TroppL. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 136–157). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
58.
WohlM.HornseyM. J.PhilpotC. (2011). A critical review of official public apologies: Aims, pitfalls, and a staircase model of effectiveness. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 70–100. doi:10.1111/j.1751–2409.2011.01026.x
59.
WohlM.van BavelJ. J. (2011). Is identifying with a historically victimized group good or bad for your health? Transgenerational post-traumatic stress and collective victimization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 818–824. doi:10.1002/ejsp.844
60.
YipT. (2005). Sources of situational variation in ethnic identity and psychological well-being: A Palm Pilot study of Chinese American students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1603–1616. doi:10.1177/0146167205277094
