In the context of daily food consumption, individuals have to evaluate their health and environmental risks based on information provided by the institutions governing food security. At the same time, they have to trust the institutions that both protect them and provide risk information. Study 1 examined how trust in EU policies that assure food safety as well as trust in the information provided by the EU about food risks is associated with risk concern and the perceived personal control of food risks. Eurobarometer 73.5, providing data about Finnish citizens (N = 1,007), was analyzed with structural equation modeling (SEM). Trust in EU policies was associated with a low level of risk concern and a high level of risk control, whereas trust in information was associated with a high level of risk concern and a low level of risk control. Study 2 examined how system justification tendencies are associated with the perceived climate risks of one’s own food system, the perception of climate change as a national threat, as well as climate-friendly food choices. University students’ (N = 350) responses to a questionnaire were analyzed with SEM. The perception of climate change as a national threat was associated with food system justification and denial of climate change, whereas knowledge was associated with climate-friendly food choices indirectly through decreased food system justification. These findings increase our understanding of system justification in the context of risk perception and suggest how its effect could be overcome with interventions that reduce perceiving risks as national threats.
ArbuckleJ. L. (2009). Amos 18 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: AMOS Development Corporation.
2.
BalabanisG.MuellerR.MelewarT. (2002). The relationship between consumer ethnocentrism and human values. Journal of Global Marketing, 15, 7–37. doi:10.1108/00070701111116464
3.
BergA. (2011). Not roadmaps but toolboxes: Analysing pioneering national programmes for sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 9–23. doi:10.1007/s10603-010-9129-2
4.
BergL. (2004). Trust in food in the age of the mad cow disease: A comparative study of consumers’ evaluation of food safety in Belgium, Britain, and Norway. Appetite, 42, 21–32. doi:10.1177/0963662509354543
5.
BildtgårdT. (2008). Trust in food in modern and late-modern societies. Social Science Information, 47, 99–128. doi:10.1177/0539018407085751
6.
Carlsson-KanyamaA.GonzálezA. (2009). Potential contributions of food consumption patterns to climate change. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89, 1704S–1709S. doi:10.3945/ ajcn.2009.26736AA
7.
ChryssochoidisG.KrystallisA.PerreasP. (2007). Ethnocentric beliefs and country-of-origin (COO) effect: Impact of country, product and product attributes on Greek consumers’ evaluation of food products. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 1518–1544. doi:10.1108/03090560710821288
8.
De GarineI. (2001). Views about food prejudice and stereotypes. Social Science Information, 40, 487–507. doi:10.1177/053901801040003006
9.
European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer 73.5 data. Cologne, Germany: GESIS.
10.
FeyginaI.JostJ. T.GoldsmithR. (2010). System justification, the denial of global warming, and the prospect of “system-sanctioned” change. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 326–338. doi:10.1177/0146167209351435
11.
FialaN. (2008). Meeting the demand: An estimation of potential future greenhouse gas emissions from meat production. Ecological Economics, 67, 412–419. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.021
12.
FinkelS.MullerE.OppK. (1989). Personal influence, collective rationality, and mass political action. American Political Science Review, 83, 885–903. doi:10.2307/1962065
13.
FritscheI.CohrsJ. C.KesslerT.BauerJ. (2012). Global warming is breeding social conflict: The subtle impact of climate change threat on authoritarian tendencies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 1–10. doi:10.1177/0013916510397759
14.
FritscheI.HäfnerK. (2012). The malicious effects of existential threat on motivation to protect the natural environment and the role of environmental identity as a moderator. Environment and Behavior, 44, 570–590. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.002
GrundyS. (2004). Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1, 2595–2600. doi:10.1210/jc.2004-0372
17.
GstraunthalerT.DayR. (2008). Avian influenza in the UK. Knowledge, risk perception and risk reduction strategies. British Food Journal, 110, 260–270. doi:10.1108/00070700810858673
18.
HalkierB. (2001). Risk and food: environmental concerns and consumer practices. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 36(8),801–812. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2621.2001.00537.x
19.
HercheJ. (1992). A note on the predictive validity of the CETSCALE. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 261–264. doi:10.1007/BF02723413
20.
HolmL.KildevangH. (1996). Consumers’ views on food quality. A qualitative interview study. Appetite, 27, 1–14. doi:10.1006/appe.1996.002
21.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
22.
JostJ. T.BanajiM.NosekB. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
23.
JostJ. T.BlountS.PfefferJ.HunyadyG. (2003). Fair market ideology: Its cognitive-motivational underpinnings. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 53–91. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(03)25002-4
24.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339
25.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
26.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
27.
JostJ. T.NapierJ.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS.PalfaiT.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007. doi:10.1177/0146167207301028
28.
JostJ. T.NosekA.GoslingS. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126–136. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
29.
JostJ. T.PelhamB.CarvalloM. (2002). Non-conscious forms of system justification: Implicit and behavioral preferences for higher status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 586–602. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00505-X
30.
JostJ. T.PelhamB.SheldonO.SullivanB. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13–36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127
31.
KaaseM. (1999). Interpersonal trust, political trust and non-institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics, 22(3), 1–21. doi:10.1177/0192512101222004
32.
KayA.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
33.
KellstedtP.ZahranS.VedlitzA. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28, 113–125. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01010.x
34.
KjærnesU.DulsrudA.PoppeC. (2005). Contestation over food safety: The significance of consumer trust. In AnsellC.VogelD. (Eds.), What’s the beef? The contested governance of European food safety (pp. 61–81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35.
KroesR.MüllerD.LambeJ.LöwikM. R. H.van KlaverenJ.KleinerJ.ViscontiA. (2002). Assessment of intake from the diet. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 40, 327–385. doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00113-2
36.
LobbA. E.MazzocchiM.TraillW. B. (2007). Modelling risk perception and trust in food safety information within the theory of planned behaviour. Food Quality and Preference, 18, 384–395. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.04.004
37.
LubellM.VedlitzA.ZahranS.AlstonL. (2006). Collective action, environmental activism, and air quality policy. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 149–160. doi:10.1177/106591290605900113
38.
LuhmannN. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
39.
MaassenG. H.BakkerA. B. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models. Sociological Methods & Research, 30, 241–270. doi:10.1177/0049124101030002004
40.
MacKinnonD.LockwoodC.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
41.
MazzocchiM.LobbA.TraillW. B.CavicchiA. (2008). Food scares and trust. A European study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 59, 2–24. doi:10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00142.x
42.
McKnightD.ChervanyN. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time. In FalconeR.SinghM.TanY.-H. (Eds.), Trust in cyber-societies (pp. 27–54). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
43.
MohaiP. (1985). Public concern and elite involvement in environmental conservation issues. Social Science Quarterly, 62, 820–838.
44.
PaloniemiR.VainioA. (2011). Why do young people participate in environmental political action?Environmental Values, 20, 397–416. doi:10.3197/096327111X13077055166108
45.
PoortingaW.SpenceA.WhitmarshL.CapstickS.PidgeonN. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1015–1024. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001
46.
PoppA.Lotze-CampenH.BodirskyB. (2010). Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gases from agricultural production. Global Environmental Change, 20, 451–462. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.02.001
47.
PutnamR. D. (2000). Bowling alone. The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
48.
RennO. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London, UK: Earthscan.
49.
RennerB.SproesserG.StrohbachS.SchuppH. (2012). Why we eat what we eat: The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS). Appetite, 59, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.04.004
50.
ShepherdS.KayA. C. (2012). On the perpetuation of ignorance: System dependence, system justification, and the motivated avoidance of sociopolitical information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 264–280. doi:10.1037/a0026272
51.
ShimpT.SharmaS. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 280–289. doi:10.2307/3151638
52.
ShroutP.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods,7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422
53.
SlovicP. (1998). Perceived risk, trust and democracy. In LöfstedtR.FrewerL. (Eds.), The earthscan reader in risk & modern society (pp. 181–192). London, UK: Earthscan.
54.
SteinfeldH.GerberP.WassenaarT.CastelV.RosalesM.De HaanC. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: FAO.
55.
SundbladE.-L.BielA.GärlingT. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgments related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 97–106. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.003
56.
VainioA.MäkiniemiJ.-P. (2013). Moral foundations and climate-friendly behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
57.
VainioA.PaloniemiR. (2013). Does belief matter in climate change action?Public Understanding of Science, 22, 382–395. doi:10.1177/0963662511410268
58.
Van’t RietJ.SijtsemaS.DagevosH.De BruijnG.-J. (2011). The importance of habits in eating behaviour. An overview and recommendations for future research. Appetite, 57, 585–596. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.07.010
59.
WardP.MeyerS. (2009). Trust, social quality and wellbeing: A sociological exegesis. Development and Society, 38, 339–363.
60.
YorkR.GossardM. (2004). Cross-national meat and fish consumption: Exploring the effects of modernization and ecological context. Ecological Economics, 48, 293–302. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.10.009
