Social dominance orientation (SDO) has been reported to be strongly related to a multitude of intergroup phenomena, but little is known about situational experiences that may influence SDO. Drawing from research on intergroup contact theory, we argue that positive intergroup contact is able to reduce SDO-levels. The results of an intergroup contact intervention study among high school students (Study 1, N = 71) demonstrated that SDO levels were indeed attenuated after the intervention. Furthermore, this intervention effect on SDO was especially pronounced among students reporting a higher quality of contact. A cross-lagged longitudinal survey among adults (Study 2, N = 363) extended these findings by demonstrating that positive intergroup contact is able to decrease SDO over time. Moreover, we did not obtain evidence for the idea that people high in SDO would engage less in intergroup contact. These findings indicate that intergroup contact erodes one of the important socio-ideological bases of generalized prejudice and discrimination.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Al RamiahA.HewstoneM. (2012). “Rallying around the flag”: Can an intergroup contact intervention promote national unity?British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 239–256. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02041.x
AsbrockF.ChristO.DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2012). Differential effects of intergroup contact for authoritarians and social dominators: A dual process model perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 477–490. doi:10.1177/0146167211429747
5.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340. doi:10.1002/per.746
6.
BillietJ.De WitteH. (1991). Naar racisme neigende houdingen in Vlaanderen: Typologie en maatschappelijke achtergronden [Attitudes towards racism in Flanders: Typology and societal backgrounds]. Leuven, Belgium: Sociologisch Onderzoeksinstituut (SOI).
7.
BillietJ.De WitteH. (2008). Everyday racism as predictor of political racism in Flemish Belgium. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 253–567. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00560.x
8.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA.…LeyensJ.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856. doi:10.1037/a0013470
9.
BretzR. D.JudgeT. A. (1994). Person–organization fit and the theory of work adjustment: Implications for satisfaction, tenure, and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 32–54.). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1003
10.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
11.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
ByrneB. M.ShavelsonR. J.MuthénB. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 456–466. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
13.
ChristO.WagnerU. (2013). Methodological issues in the study of intergroup contact: Towards a new wave of research. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 233–261). London, UK: Psychology Press.
14.
ChurchA. T. (1982). Sojourner adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 540–572. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.91.3.540
15.
CoendersM.LubbersM.ScheepersP.VerkuytenM. (2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 269–285. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00561.x
16.
DaviesK.TroppL. R.AronA.PettigrewT. F.WrightS. C. (2011). Cross-group friendships and intergroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 332–351. doi:10.1177/1088868311411103
17.
DhontK.CornelisI.van HielA. (2010). Interracial public–police contact: Relationships with police officers’ racial and work-related attitudes and behaviors. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 551–560. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2010.07.004
18.
DhontK.RoetsA.van HielA. (2011). Opening closed minds: The combined effects of intergroup contact and need for closure on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 514–528. doi:10.1177/0146167211399101
19.
DhontK.van HielA. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.022
20.
DhontK.van HielA. (2011). Direct contact and authoritarianism as moderators between extended contact and reduced prejudice: Lower threat and greater trust as mediators. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 223–237. doi:10.1177/1368430210391121
21.
DhontK.van HielA.De BolleM.RoetsA. (2012). Longitudinal intergroup contact effects on prejudice using self- and observer-reports. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 221–238. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02039.x
22.
DixonJ.TroppL. R.DurrheimK.TredouxC. (2010). “Let them eat harmony”: Prejudice-reduction strategies and attitudes of historically disadvantaged groups. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 76–80. doi:10.1177/0963721410363366
23.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6
24.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2003). “Gringos” in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 55–75. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001012
25.
GuimondS.DambrunM.MichinovN.DuarteS. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 697–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.697
26.
HaleyH.SidaniusJ. (2005). Person–organization congruence and the maintenance of group-based social hierarchy: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 187–203. doi:10.1177/1368430205051067
27.
HewstoneM. (2009). Living apart, living together? The role of intergroup contact in social integration. Proceedings of the British Academy, 162, 243–300. doi:10.5871/bacad/9780197264584.003.0009
28.
HodsonG. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (social dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351. doi:10.1348/014466607X231109
29.
HodsonG. (2011). Do ideologically intolerant people benefit from intergroup contact?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 154–159. doi:10.1177/0963721411409025
30.
HodsonG.EssesV. M. (2005). Lay perceptions of ethnic prejudice: Causes, solutions, and individual differences. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 329–344. doi:10.1002/ejsp.251
31.
HodsonG.HarryH.MitchellA. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525. doi:10.1002/ejsp.558
32.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
33.
HuangL. L.LiuJ. H. (2005). Personality and social structural implications of the situational priming of social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 267–276. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.04.006
JöreskogK. G.SorbomD. (2004). LISREL 8.7 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
36.
JuddC. M.KennyD. A.McClellandG. H. (2001). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-participant designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115–134. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.6.2.115
37.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
KteilyN. S.HoA.SidaniusJ. (2012). Hierarchy in the mind: The predictive power of social dominance orientation across social contexts and domains. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 543–549. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.11.007
39.
KteilyN. S.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2011). Social dominance orientation: Cause or “mere effect”?: Evidence for SDO as a causal predictor of prejudice and discrimination against ethnic and racial outgroups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 208–214. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.009
40.
LippaR.AradS. (1999). Gender, personality, and prejudice: The display of authoritarianism and social dominance in interviews with college men and women. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 463–493. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2266
41.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question and weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
42.
LittleT. D.PreacherK. J.SeligJ. P.CardN. A. (2007). New developments in latent variable panel analyses of longitudinal data. Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 357–365. doi:10.1177/0165025407077757
43.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.4.602
44.
MatthewsM.LevinS.SidaniusJ. (2009). A longitudinal test of the model of political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Political Psychology, 30, 921–936. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00733.x
45.
McConahayJ. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the modern racism scale. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination and racism (pp. 91–126). New York, NY: Academic Press.
MilmanA.ReichelA.PizamA. (1990). The impact of tourism on ethnic attitudes: The Israeli–Egyptian case. Journal of Travel Research, 29, 45–49. doi:10.1177/004728759002900207
48.
MorrisonK.YbarraO. (2008). The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 156–163. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.12.006
49.
PedersenP. J. (2009).Teaching toward an ethnorelative worldview through psychology study abroad. Intercultural Education, 20, 73–86. doi:10.1080/14675980903370896
50.
PerryR.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: A meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 116–127. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004
51.
PettigrewT. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 23, 173–185. doi:10.1177/0146167297232006
52.
PettigrewT. F. (2009). Secondary transfer effect of contact: Do intergroup contact effects spread to noncontacted outgroups?Social Psychology, 40, 55–65. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.2.55
53.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
54.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2011). When groups meet: The dynamics of intergroup contact. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
55.
PizamA.FleischerA.MansfeldY. (2002). Tourism and social change: The case of Israeli ecotourists visiting Jordan. Journal of Travel Research, 41, 177–184. doi:10.1177/004728702237423
56.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. doi:10.1080/10463280601055772
57.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
58.
RoetsA.van HielA.DhontK. (2012). Is sexism a gender issue? A motivated social cognition perspective on men’s and women’s sexist attitudes toward the own and other gender. European Journal of Personality, 26, 350–359. doi:10.1002/per.843
59.
SaguyT.TroppL.HawiD. (2013). The role of group power in intergroup contact. In HodsonG.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Advances in intergroup contact (pp. 113–132). London, UK: Psychology Press.
60.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
61.
SchaferJ. L.GrahamJ. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.2.147
62.
SchildE. O. (1962). The foreign student as a stranger learning the norms of the host culture. Journal of Social Issues, 75, 41–54. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1962.tb02570.x
63.
SchmidK.HewstoneM.KüpperB.ZickA.WagnerU. (2012). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: A cross-national comparison in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 75, 28–51. doi:10.1177/0190272511430235
64.
SchmittM.BranscombeN.KappenD. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity?British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161–186. doi:10.1348/014466603322127166
65.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
66.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). The ideological legitimation of the status quo: Longitudinal tests of a social dominance model. Political Psychology, 31, 109–137. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00747.x
67.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H. (2010). Social dominance orientation: Testing a global individual difference perspective. Political Psychology, 31, 175–207. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00748.x
68.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ. (2007a). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160–172. doi:10.1177/0146167206294745
69.
SibleyC. G.WilsonM. S.DuckittJ. (2007b). Effects of dangerous and competitive worldviews on right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation over a five-month period. Political Psychology, 28, 357–371. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00572.x
70.
SidaniusJ.LevinS.van LaarC.SearsD.O. (2009). The diversity challenge: Social identity and intergroup relations on the college campus. New York, NY: The Russell Sage Foundation.
71.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
SidaniusJ.van LaarC.LevinS.SinclairS. (2003). Social hierarchy maintenance and assortment into social roles: A social dominance perspective. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 333–352. doi:10.1177/13684302030064002
73.
StephanW. G.VogtW. P. (Eds.). (2004). Education programs for improving intergroup relations: Theory, research and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
74.
SwartH.HewstoneM.ChristO.VociA. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1221–1238. doi:10.1037/a0024450
75.
TauschN.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.PsaltisC.SchmidK.PopanJ. R.HughesJ. (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 282–302. doi:10.1037/a0018553
76.
TroppL. R. (2006). Stigma and intergroup contact among members of minority and majority status groups. In LevinS.van LaarC. (Eds.), Stigma and group inequality: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 171–191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01643.x
78.
Van HielA.DuriezB. (2002). Een meetinstrument voor individuele verschillen in Sociale Dominantie Oriëntatie [A scale to measure individual differences in social dominance orientation]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psycholgie en haar Grensgebieden, 57, 114–116.
79.
Van HielA.MervieldeI. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2323–2344. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02105.x
80.
Van LaarC.LevinS.SinclairS.SidaniusJ. (2005). The effect of university roommate contact on ethic attitudes and behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 329–345. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.08.002
81.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice towards immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001011
