Honor is a central concept in the profession of arms. The present study of 2,254 Canadian Forces (CF) members examined how they viewed the honor of their peers at ranks below, at, or above their own. Although rank is itself a form of vertical honor, participants’ mean assessments of honor were inversely related to these relative-rank distinctions. As well, averaged across vertical honor, the assessed honor of other CF members directly predicted their willingness to risk their lives in combat operations. This effect was fully mediated by participants’ affective commitment to the CF and it was partially mediated by their sense of duty. The findings show that how professionals perceive the honor of their peers does not simply follow vertical indices of honor, and that those perceptions predict attitudinal states (e.g., affective commitment) and behavioral intentions (willingness to risk one’s life to perform one’s duties).
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
2.
AschS. E. (1940). Studies in the principles of judgments and attitudes: II. Determination of judgments by group and by ego standards. Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 433–465. doi: 10.1080/ 00224545.1940.9921487
3.
BakerD.-P. (2011). Just warriors, Inc.: The ethics of privatized force. New York, NY: Continuum.
4.
BarrettF. J.SarbinT. R. (2008). Honor as a moral category: A historical-linguistic analysis. Theory & Psychology, 18, 5–25. doi: 10.1177/ 0959354307086920
5.
BeckerT. (1998). Integrity in organizations: Beyond honesty and conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23, 154–161. doi: 10.2307/ 259104
6.
BradleyJ. P.CharbonneauD. (2004). Measuring professional attitudes in Canada’s Army. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 2, 159–170.
7.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
8.
BrownM. E.TreviñoL. K.HarrisonD. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.002
9.
CapstickM.FarleyK.WildW.ParkesM. (2005). Canada’s soldiers: Military ethos and Canadian values in the 21st century Army: The major findings of The Army Culture and Climate Survey and The Army Socio-Cultural Survey (CROP 3SC). Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Government.
10.
Chief of Defence Staff. (2003). Duty with honour: The profession of arms in Canada. Kingston, Canada: Canadian Defence Academy, Canadian Forces Leadership Institute.
11.
CohenD.NisbettR. E.BowdleB. F.SchwarzN. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the Southern culture of honor: An experimental ethnography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.945
12.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate. (2005). United States Army field manual No. 1. Washington, DC: Department of the Army.
14.
CullenJ. B.ParboteeahK. P.VictorB. (2003). The effects of ethical climates on organizational commitment: A two-study analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 127–141. doi: 10.1023/A:1025089819456
15.
FerridayC. L.VartanianO.MandelD. R. (2011). Public but not private ego threat triggers aggression in narcissists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 564–568. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.801
16.
FrenchS. E. (2005). Code of the warrior: The values and ideals of warrior cultures throughout history. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
17.
GalR. (1985). Commitment and obedience in the military: An Israeli case study. Armed Forces & Society, 11, 553–564. doi: 10.1177/0095327X8501100405
18.
HaidtJ. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834. doi: 10.1037//0033-295X.108.4.814
19.
IgnatieffM. (1997). The warrior’s honor: Ethnic war and the modern conscience. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
20.
IJzermanH.CohenD. (2011). Grounding cultural syndromes: Body comportment and values in honor and dignity cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 456–467. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.806
21.
IJzermanH.van DijkW. W.GallucciM. (2007). A bumpy train ride: A field experiment on insult, honor, and emotional reactions. Emotion, 7, 869–875. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.869
22.
JonesD. N.PaulhusD. L. (2010). Different provocations trigger aggression in narcissists and psychopaths. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 12–18. doi: 10.1177/ 1948550609347591
23.
LeungA. K.-Y.CohenD. (2011). Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 507–526. doi: 10.1037/a0022151
24.
MandelD. R.VartanianO. (2008). Taboo or tragic: Effect of tradeoff type on moral choice, conflict, and confidence. Mind & Society, 7, 215–226. doi: 10.1007/s11299-007-0037-3
25.
MeyerJ. P.AllenN. J.SmithC. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538–551. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.78.4.538
26.
MeyerJ. P.PaunonenS. V.GellatlyI. R.GoffinR. D.JacksonD. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 152–156. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.74.1.152
27.
MillerW. I. (1993). Humiliation and other essays on honor, social discomfort, and violence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
NeubertM. J.CarlsonD. S.KacmarK. M.RobertsJ. A.ChonkoL. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 157–170. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0037-9
29.
NisbettR. E.CohenD. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
OlsthoornP. (2005). Honor as a motive for making sacrifices. Journal of Military Ethics, 4, 183–197. doi: 10.1080/15027570500230262
31.
Pitt-RiversJ. (1965). Honour and social status. In PeristianyJ. G. (Ed.), Honour and shame: The values of Mediterranean society (pp. 18–77). London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
Rodriguez MosqueraP. M.MansteadA. S. R.FischerA. H. (2002). Honor in the Mediterranean and Northern Europe. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33, 16–36. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033001002
34.
RuizP.RuizC.MartínezR. (2011). Improving the “leader–follower” relationship: Top manager or supervisor? The ethical leadership trickle-down effect on follower job response. Journal of Business Ethics, 99, 587–608. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0670-3
35.
SchlenkerB. R. (2008). Integrity and character: Implications of principled and expedient ethical ideologies. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 1078–1125. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2008.27.10.1078
36.
SchminkeM.AmbroseM. L.NeubaumD. O. (2005). The effect of leader moral development on ethical climate and employee attitudes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes97, 135–151. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.03.006
37.
SimonsT. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35. doi: 10.1287/orsc.13.1.18.543
38.
SparksP.FarsidesT. (2011). Social dimensions of judgments of integrity in public figures. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 170–179. doi: 10.1348/014466610X520140
39.
StewartF. H. (1994). Honor. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
40.
StoufferS. A.LumsdaineA. A.LumsdaineM. H.WilliamsR. M.Jr.SmithM. B.JanisI. L.CottrellL. S.Jr. (1949). The American soldier: Combat and its aftermath. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
ThompsonM. M.ThomsonM. H.AdamsB. D. (2008). Moral and ethical dilemmas in Canadian Forces military operation: Qualitative and descriptive analyses of commanders’ operational experiences (Defence R&D Canada – Toronto Technical Report [TR-2008-183]). Retrieved from http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc88/p531856.pdf
42.
TreviñoL. K.HartmanL. P.BrownM. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42, 128–142. doi: 10.2307/41166057
43.
UskulA. K.CrossS. E.SunbayZ.Gercek-SwingB.AtacaB. (in press). Honor bound: The cultural construction of honor in Turkey and the Midwestern US. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
44.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 997–1010. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.997
45.
VandelloJ. A.CohenD.RansomS. (2008). U.S. southern and northern differences in perceptions of norms about aggression: Mechanisms for the perpetuation of a culture of honor. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 162–177. doi: 10.1177/0022022107313862
46.
VaughanD. K.SchumW. A. (2001). Motivation in U.S. narrative accounts of the ground war in Vietnam. Armed Forces & Society, 28, 7–31. doi: 10.1177/0095327X0102800102
47.
WeaverG. R.TreviñoL. K.AgleB. (2005). “Somebody I look up to”: Ethical role models in organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 34, 313–330. doi: org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.08.001
