Why follow? The interplay of leader categorization,identification,and feeling respected

Abstract

Guided by both social cognitive and identity-based perspectives of leadership, the present study investigated how and when the process of leader categorization results in greater leader effectiveness. Specifically, we propose that the relationship between leader categorization and subordinates’ openness toward leadership should be partially mediated by subordinates’ identification with their leaders. Furthermore, seeking to corroborate that the issue of self-esteem is the central ingredient in the identification process, we argue that the mediation should become weaker the more subordinates feel that they are being treated disrespectfully by their leaders, and thus are explicitly undermined in their efforts toward self-enhancement. The proposed mediating effect was tested and supported in two field studies (N₁ = 244, N₂ = 645). In the second study, we also tested and found support for the proposed moderated mediation model. The theoretical and managerial consequences are discussed.

Keywords

identification influence leadership relationship respect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Hogg

M. A.

(1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317–334. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180403.

Anderson

J. C.

Gerbing

D. W.

(1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

Aron

(2003). Self and close relationships. In Leary

M. R.

Tangney

J. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 442–461). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

Barreto

Ellemers

(2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629–639.

Barsalou

L. W.

(1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654. doi: 10.1177/0146167202288007.

Birnbaum

M. H.

(2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych. 55.090902.141601.

Brewer

M. B.

Gardner

(1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83– doi: 93.10.1037//0022-3514.71.1.83.

Brown

D. J.

Lord

R. G.

(2001). Leadership and perceiver cognition: Moving beyond first order constructs. In London

(Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations (pp. 181–202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

10.

Carl

Gupta

Javidan

(2004). Power distance. In House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

Gupta

(Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies(pp. 513–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

11.

Chhokar

J. S.

Brodbeck

F. C.

House

R. J.

(Eds.). (2007). Culture and leadership across the world: The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.

12.

de Cremer

Tyler

T. R.

(2005). A matter of intragroup status: The importance of respect for the viability of groups. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 7, 1–22. doi: 10.1016/S1534-0856(05)07001-5.

13.

Dillon

R. S.

(2007). Respect: A philosophical perspective Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38, 201–212. doi: 10.1007/s11612-007-0016-5.

14.

Dorfman

P.W.

Hanges

P. J.

Brodbeck

F. C.

(2004). Leadership and cultural variation. In House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

Gupta

(Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp.669–719). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

15.

Eckloff

Van Quaquebeke

(2008). “Ich folge Dir, wenn Du in meinen Augen eine gute Führungskraft bist, denn dann kann ich mich auch mit Dir identifizieren”—Wie Einflussoffenheit von Untergebenen über Identifikationsprozesse vermittelt wird. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 169–181. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089.52.4.169.

16.

Eden

Leviatan

(1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 736–741. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.60.6.736.

17.

Edwards

J. R.

(2008). Seven deadly myths of testing moderation in organizational research. In Lance

C. E.

Vandenberg

R.J.

(Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Received doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 145−166). New York, NY: Routledge.

18.

Epitropaki

Martin

(2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659.

19.

French

J. R. P.

Jr. Raven

(1959). The bases of social power. In Cartwright

(Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

20.

Ganzach

(1997). Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms. Psychological Methods, 2, 235−247. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.235.

21.

Giessner

S. R.

van Knippenberg

(2008). “License to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1), 14–35. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.04.002.

22.

Giessner

S. R.

van Knippenberg

Sleebos

(2009). License to fail? How leader group prototypicality moderates the effects of leader performance on perceptions of leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 434–451. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.012.

23.

Giessner

S. R.

Van Quaquebeke

(2010). Using a relational models perspective to understand normatively appropriate conduct in ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 43–55. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0790-4.

24.

Gosling

S. D.

Vazire

Srivastava

John

O. P.

(2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X. 59.2.93.

25.

Hains

S. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Duck

J. M.

(1997). Self-categorization and leadership: Effects of group prototypicality and leader stereotypicality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1087–1099. doi: 10.1177/01461672972310009.

26.

Haslam

S. A

Reicher

S. D.

Platow

M. J.

(2011). The new pschology of leadership. Hove: Psychology Press.

27.

Hayes

A. F.

(2007). SPSS moderated mediation macros. Retrieved December, 2007, from http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu/ahayes/SPSS%20programs/modmed.htm

28.

Hogg

M. A.

(2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184–200. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0503_1.

29.

Hogg

M. A.

Hains

S. C.

Mason

(1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248–1263. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1248.

30.

Hollander

E. P.

(1964). Leaders, groups, and influence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

31.

House

R. J.

Hanges

P. J.

Javidan

Dorfman

P. W.

Gupta

(2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations—The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

32.

Kenney

R. A.

Schwartz-Kenney

B. M.

Blascovich

(1996). Implicit leadership theories: Defining leaders described as worthy of influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1128–1143. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp1504_2.

33.

Kihlstrom

J. F.

Beer

J. S.

Klein

S. B.

(2003). Self and identity as memory. In Leary

M. R.

Tangney

J. P.

(Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 68–90). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

34.

Leary

M. R.

Tangney

J. P.

(2003). Handbook of self and identity. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

35.

Lord

R. G.

Brown

D. J.

(2004). Leadership processes and follower self-identity. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

36.

Lord

R. G.

Brown

D. J.

Freiberg

S. J.

(1999). Understanding the dynamics of leadership: The role of follower self-concepts in the leader/follower relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 167–203. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1999.2832.

37.

Lord

R. G.

de Vader

C. L.

Alliger

G. M.

(1986). A meta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization procedures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402–410. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.402.

38.

Lord

R. G.

Foti

R. J.

de Vader

C. L.

(1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343–378. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90043-6.

39.

Lord

R. G.

Maher

K. J.

(1993). Leadership and information processing: Linking perceptions and performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.

40.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Fairchild

A. J.

Fritz

M. S.

(2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542.

41.

Mael

F. A.

Ashforth

B. E.

(1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123. doi: 10.1002/job.4030130202.

42.

Markus

Wurf

(1987). The dynamic self- concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299–337. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503.

43.

Maurer

T. J.

Lord

R. G.

(1991). An exploration of cognitive demands in group interaction as a moderator of information processing variables in perceptions of leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 821–839. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00445.x.

44.

McClelland

G. H.

Judd

C. M.

(1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376–390. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376.

45.

Meindl

J. R.

Ehrlich

S. B.

Dukerich

J. M.

(1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102. doi: 10.2307/2392813.

46.

Miller

D. T.

(2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527–552. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.527.

47.

Nye

J. L.

(2005). Implicit theories and leadership perceptions in the thick of it: The effects of prototype matching, group setbacks, and group outcomes. In Schyns

Meindl

J. R.

(Eds.), Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations (pp. 3–25). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

48.

Nye

J. L.

Brower

A. M.

(1996). What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

49.

Nye

J. L.

Forsynth

D. R.

(1991). The effects of prototype-based biases on leadership appraisals: A test of leadership categorization theory. Small Group Research, 22, 360–375. doi: 10.1177/1046496491223005.

50.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Podsakoff

N. P.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J.-Y.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903. doi: 10.1177/1094428110366303.

51.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Schriesheim

C. A.

(1985). Field studies of French and Raven’s bases of power: Critique, reanalysis, and suggestions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 387–411. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

52.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. S.

(2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.

53.

Preacher

K. J.

Rucker

D. D.

Hayes

A. F.

(2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.

54.

Reips

U.-D.

(2002). Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256. doi: 10.1027//1618-3169.49.4.243.

55.

Rosch

(1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch

Lloyd

B. B.

(Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

56.

Schein

V. E.

Davidson

M. J.

(1993). Think manager, think male. Management Development Review, 6, 24–28. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000000738.

57.

Schyns

Meindl

J. R.

(Eds.). (2005). Implicit leadership theories: Essays and explorations. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

58.

Sedikides

Brewer

M. B.

(2001). Individual self, relational self, collective self. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

59.

Sedikides

Gregg

(2003). Portraits of the self. In Hogg

M. A.

Cooper

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 110–138). London: Sage.

60.

Shamir

Kark

(2004). A single-item graphic scale for the measurement of organizational identification. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 115–123. doi: 10.1348/096317904322915946.

61.

Shamir

Pillai

Bligh

M. C.

Uhl-Bien

(Eds.). (2006). Follower-centered perspectives on leadership. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

62.

Sluss

D. M.

Ashforth

B. E.

(2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32, 9–32. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.23463672.

63.

Taylor

S. E.

Crocker

(1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In Higgins

E. T.

Herman

C. P.

Zanna

M. P.

(Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

64.

Turner

J. C.

(1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In Tajfel

(Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

65.

Turner

J. C.

Hogg

M. A.

Oakes

P. J.

Reicher

S. D.

Wetherell

M. S.

(1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

66.

Ullrich

Christ

Van Dick

(2009). Substitutes for procedural fairness: prototypical leaders are endorsed whether they are fair or not. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 235–244. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2007.23463672.

67.

van Dick

Wagner

Stellmacher

Christ

(2004). The utility of a broader conceptualization of organizational identification: Which aspects really matter? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 171–191. doi: 10.1348/096317904774202135.

68.

van Dijke

de Cremer

Mayer

D. M.

Van Quaquebeke

(2012). When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)? The moderating roles of two types of empowering leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 235–248. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.10.006.

69.

van Knippenberg

Hogg

M. A.

(2003a). Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations. London: Sage.

70.

van Knippenberg

Hogg

M. A.

(2003b). A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. In Kramer

R. M.

Staw

B. M.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 25 (pp. 243–295). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

71.

van Knippenberg

De Cremer

Hogg

M. A.

(2004). Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 825–856. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002.

72.

Van Quaquebeke

Brodbeck

F. C.

(2008). Entwicklung und erste Validierung zweier Instrumente zur Erfassung von Führungskräfte-Kategorisierung im deutschsprachigen Raum. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 52, 70–80. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089.52.2.70.

73.

Van Quaquebeke

Eckloff

(2010). Defining respectful leadership: What it is, how it can be measured, and another glimpse at what it is related to. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 343–358. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0087-z.

74.

Van Quaquebeke

Graf

M. M.

Brodbeck

F. C.

(2007). What do leaders have to live up to? Contrasting the effects of typical versus ideal leader prototypes for the process of leader categorization. 13th European Congress of Work and Organizational Psychology. Stockholm, Sweden, May 9th–12th.

75.

Van Quaquebeke

Henrich

D. C.

Eckloff

(2007). “It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 38, 185–200. doi: 10.1007/s11612-007-0015-6.

76.

Van Quaquebeke

van Knippenberg

Brodbeck

F. C.

(2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates’ self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 367–382. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.011

77.

Van Quaquebeke

van Knippenberg

Eckloff

(2011). Individual differences in the leader categorization to openness to influence relationship: The role of followers’ self-perceptions and social comparison orientation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 14, 605–622. doi: 10.1177/1368430210391311.

78.

Van Quaquebeke

Zenker

Eckloff

(2009). Find out how much it means to me! The importance of interpersonal respect in work values compared to perceived organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 423–431. 10.1007/s10551-008-0008-6.

79.

Van Vugt

Hogan

Kaiser

(2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182–196. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182.

80.

Weick

K. E.

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

81.

Yukl

G. A.

(2010). Leadership in organizations (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

82.

Yukl

G. A.

Falbe

C. M.

(1990). Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 132–140. doi: 0021-9010/90/500.75.