The norm of group interest dictates that group members should consider the interests of their group. We propose that individual variability in adherence to this norm accounts for intergroup attitudes and behavior. Study 1 developed a measure for the norm of group interest, and found that adherence to the norm predicted evaluations of the outgroup independent of group identification and collective self-esteem. Studies 2 and 3 demonstrated that the norm of group interest increased competitive behavior only when a competitive group norm was salient, but not when a cooperative norm was salient. These findings highlight the importance of both the norm of group interest and group norms to understanding attitudes and behavior in the intergroup context.
AbersonC. L.HealyM.RomeroV. (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 157–173. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402
2.
AbramsD.HoggM. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 317–334. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2420180403
3.
AllisonP. D. (1992). Cultural relatedness under oblique and horizontal transmission rules. Ethology & Sociobiology, 13, 153–169. doi: 10.1016/0162-3095(92)90031-X
4.
AltemeyerB. (1988). Enemies of freedom. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
5.
AndersonW.HargraveT. (1990). Contextual family therapy and older people: Building trust in the intergeneration family. Journal of Family Therapy, 12, 311–320. doi: 10.1046/j..1990.00399.x
6.
BaerJ. (1994). Effects of college residence on perceived norms for alcohol consumption: An examination of the first year of college. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 8, 43–50. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.8.1.43
7.
BaronJ. (2001). Confusion of group interest and self-interest in parochial cooperation on behalf of a group. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45, 283–296. doi: 10.1177/0022002701045003002
8.
Ben-YoavO.PruittD. (1984). Accountability to constituents: A two-edged sword. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 34, 283–295.
BornsteinG.CrumL.WittenbrakerJ.HarringK.InskoC. A.ThibautJ. (1983). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 321–350.
CampbellD. T. (1975). On the conflicts between biological and social evolution and between psychology and moral tradition. American Psychologist, 30, 1103–1126. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.30.12.1103
13.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
14.
CohenT. R.MontoyaR. M.InskoC. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1559–1572. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291673
15.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.60
16.
GaertnerL.InskoC. A. (2001). On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm: Norms as moderators of the expression of intergroup bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 143–154. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.28
17.
GramzowR. H.GaertnerL. (2005). Self-esteem and favoritism toward novel in-groups: The self as an evaluative base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 801–815. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.801
18.
GramzowR. H.GaertnerL.SedikidesC. (2001). Memory for in-group and out-group information in a minimal group context: The self as an informational base. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 188–205. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.188
19.
HallD. T.SchneiderB.NygrenH. T. (1970). Personal factors in organizational identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 176–190.
20.
HenryK. B.ArrowH.CariniB. (1999). A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558–581. doi: 10.1177/104649649903000504
21.
HertelG.KerrN. L. (2001). Priming in-group favoritism: The impact of normative scripts in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 316–324. doi: 10.1006/jesp.2000.1447
22.
JacksonC. L.ColquittJ. A.WessonM. J.Zapata-PhelanC. E. (2006). Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 884–899.
23.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1996a). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222–1233. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222
24.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1996b). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603–609.
25.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
26.
JohnsonR. C.DankoG. P.HuangY.-H.ParkJ. Y.JohnsonS. B.NagoshiC. T. (1987). Guilt, shame, and adjustment in three cultures. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 357–364.
27.
KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B. (2000). A focus theory of normative conduct: When norms do and do not affect behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1002–1012. doi: 10.1177/01461672002610009
28.
KelmanH. C. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581–600.
29.
LearyM. R.KellyK. M.CottrellC. A.SchreindorferL. S. (2007). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University.
30.
LeibigA.GreenK. (1999). The development of family loyalty and relational ethics in children. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 21, 89–112. doi: 10.1023/A:1021966705566
31.
LouisW. R.TaylorD. M.DouglasR. L. (2005). Normative influence and relational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost–benefit analyses for intergroup behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 355–374. doi: 10.1177/1368430205056465
32.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi: 10.1177/0146167292183006
33.
MontoyaR. M.PittinskyT. L.(2007, January). The desire to be a “good group member”: A normative model of intergroup relations. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.
34.
Muñoz-RojasD.Falomir PichastorJ. M.Invernizzi GambaF.LeuenbergerS. (2000). Normative discrepancies and social discrimination change in an experimental group setting. International Review of Social Psychology, 13, 7–40.
OakerG.BrownR. (1986). Intergroup relations in a hospital setting: A further test of social identity theory. Human Relations, 39, 767–778.
37.
PettigrewT. F. (1991). Normative theory of intergroup relations: Explaining both harmony and conflict. Psychology and Developing Societies, 3, 3–16. doi: 10.1177/097133369100300102
38.
PinterB.InskoC. A.WildschutT.KirchnerJ. L.MontoyaR. M.WolfS. T. (2007). Reduction of interindividual–intergroup discontinuity: The role of leader accountability and proneness to guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 250–265. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.250
39.
PittinskyT. L.RosenthalS. A.MontoyaR. M. (2011). Measuring positive attitudes toward outgroups: Development and validation of the Allophilia Scale. In TroppL. R.MallettR. (Eds.), Beyond prejudice reduction: Pathways to positive intergroup relations (pp. 141–160). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
41.
RabbieJ. M.LodewijkxH. F. (1994). Conflict and aggression: An individual–group continuum. In MarkovskyB.O’BrienJ.HeimerK. (Eds.), Advances in group processes, Vol. 11 (pp. 139–174). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42.
RabbieJ. M.SchotJ. C.VisserL. (1989, July). Instrumental intragroup co-operation and intergroup competition in the minimal group paradigm. Paper presented at the Social Identity Conference, University of Exeter, UK.
43.
RenoR. R.CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A. (1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 104–112. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.104
44.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Press.
45.
SchwartzS. H. (1973). Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 349–364. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(73)90071-1
46.
SherifM. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Oxford, UK: Harper.
47.
SilverM. D.BrewerM. B. (2012). Ingroup loyalty as an action tendency. Manuscript submitted for publication.
48.
StangorC.SechristG.JostJ. T. (2001). Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 486–496. doi: 10.1177/0146167201274009
49.
SumnerW. G. (1906). Folkways. Boston, MA: Ginn.
50.
TajfelH. (1970). Experiments in intergroup discrimination. Scientific America, 223, 96–102.
51.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
52.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
53.
TangneyJ. P. (2003). Self-relevant emotions. In LearyM. R.TangneyR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 384–400). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
ThibautJ. W.KelleyH. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Oxford, UK: Wiley.
55.
TriandisH.BontempoR.BetancourtH.BondM.LeungB.GeorgasJ.deMontmollinG. (1986). The measurement of etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 257–267.
Van VugtM.HartC. M. (2004). Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 585–598.
58.
WagnerJ. A. (1995). Studies of individualism–collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. The Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152–172.
59.
WigginsJ. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412.
60.
WildschutT.InskoC. A. (2006). A paradox of intergroup morality: Social psychology as empirical philosophy. In van LangeP. A. M. (Ed.), Bridging social psychology: Benefits of transdisciplinary approaches (pp. 377–384). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61.
WildschutT.InskoC. A.GaertnerL. (2002). Intragroup social influence and intergroup competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 975–992. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.975
62.
WildschutT.PinterB.VeveaJ. L.InskoC. A.SchoplerJ. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual–intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 698–722. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.698
