Three studies examined how minority group members’ acculturation strategies are shaped by the extent to which they perceive differences between their cultural values and the values of majority society. In line with the creative distinctiveness hypothesis (Spears, Jetten, Scheepers, and Cihangir, 2009), perceived difference among country migrant workers in China was positively associated with endorsement of an integration strategy (Study 1). Among Chinese immigrants in Australia (Study 2), a positive association was found between perceived difference and willingness to integrate only among those who were less identified with the superordinate category. Study 3 manipulated Asian international students’ perceived cultural value difference between their group and the Australian majority, and replicated Study 2 findings. Especially among those who are less committed to the superordinate group, then, knowing how the minority group is different can facilitate willingness to integrate into the majority culture.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BadeaC.JettenJ.IyerA.Er-rafiyA. (2011). Negotiating dual identities: The impact of group-based rejection on identification and acculturation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 586–595.
3.
BerryJ. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 5–34.
4.
BerryJ. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–631.
5.
BerryJ.PhinneyJ. S.SamD. L.VedderP. (2006). Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity, and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55(3), 303–332.
6.
BerryJ.SabatierC. (2010). Acculturation, discrimination, and adaptation among second generation immigrant youth in Montreal and Paris. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(3), 191–207.
DemoulinS.TeixeiraC.P. (2010). Social categorization in interpersonal negotiation: How social structural factors shape negotiations. Group Process & Intergroup Relations, 13(6), 765–777.
9.
DoosjeB.EllermersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
10.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.NiemannY. F.SniderK. (2001). Racial, ethnic, and cultural differences in responding to distinctiveness and discrimination on campus: Stigma and common group identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 167–188.
11.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.SaguyT. (2009). Commonality and the complexity of “we”: Social attitudes and social change. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(1), 3–20.
12.
FestingerL. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 70, 28–40.
13.
GonzálezR.BrownR. (2006). Dual identities in intergroup contact: Group status and size moderate the generalization of positive attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(6), 753–767.
HoggM. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
16.
HoggM. A. (1993). Group cohesiveness: A critical review and some new directions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 85–111.
17.
HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2000). Intergroup similarity and subgroup relations: Some implications for assimilation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 948–958.
18.
HutchisonP.JettenJ.ChristianJ.HaycraftE. (2006). Protecting threatened identity: Sticking with the group by emphasizing ingroup heterogeneity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1620–1632.
19.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1222–1233.
20.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality: Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(6), 635–657.
21.
JettenJ.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Defining dimensions of distinctiveness: Group variability makes a difference to differentiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1481–1492.
22.
JettenJ.SpearsR.PostmesT. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 862–879.
23.
LanY. (2006). On cultural conformity of town and country in the process of urbanization in China. Human Geography, 21(6), 45–48.
24.
LiC. (2007). Urban and rural immigrants and social mobility. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2, 88–94.
LuijtersK.van der ZeeK.OttenS. (2008). Cultural diversity in organizations: Enhancing identification by valuing differences. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 154–163.
27.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 37–68.
28.
MummendeyA.WenzelM. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(2), 158–174.
29.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20(4), 444–446.
30.
SaguyT.TauschN.DovidioJ. F.PrattoF. (2009). The irony of harmony: Intergroup contact can produce false expectations for equality. Psychological Science, 20(1), 114–121.
31.
SchmidK.HewstoneM.TauschN.CairnsE.HughesJ. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of social identity complexity: Intergroup contact, distinctiveness threat, and outgroup attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1085–1098.
32.
SchmittM. T.SpearsR.BranscombeN. R. (2003). Constructing a minority group identity out of shared rejection: The case of international students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–12.
33.
SimonB.AufderheideB.KampmeierC. (2004). The social psychology of minority–majority relations. In BrewerM. B.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Self and social psychology (pp. 278–297). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34.
SpearsR.JettenJ.ScheepersD. (2002). Distinctiveness and the definition of collective self: A tripartite model. In TesserA.WoodJ. V.StapelD. A. (Eds.), Self and motivation: Emerging psychological perspectives (pp. 147–171). Washington, DC: APA.
35.
SpearsR.JettenJ.ScheepersD.CihangirS. (2009). Creative distinctiveness: Exploring in-group bias in minimal groups. In OttenS.KesslerT.SassenbergK. (Eds.), Intergroup relations: The role of motivation and emotion (pp. 23–40). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
36.
TajfelH. (Ed.). (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London, UK: Academic Press.
37.
TajfelH.FlamentJ. C.BilligM. G.BundyR. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–177.
38.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
39.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
40.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). A self-categorization theory. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 42–67). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
41.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellW. S. (Eds.). (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
42.
TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J.HaslamS. A.McGartyC. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463.
43.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.GroenewoudJ. T.HewstoneM. (1996). Cooperation, ethnic salience and generalization of interethnic attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 649–661.
44.
Van OudenhovenJ. P.PrinsK. S.BuunkB. P. (1998). Attitudes of minority and majority members towards adaptation of immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 649–661.
45.
VerkuytenM. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(1), 121–138.
46.
VerkuytenM. (2006). Multicultural recognition and ethnic minority rights: A social identity perspective. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 148–184.
47.
VerkuytenM. (2010). Assimilation ideology and situational well-being among ethnic minority members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 269–275.
48.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 635–654.
49.
WrightS. C.LubenskyM. (2008). The struggle for social equality: Collective action vs. prejudice reduction. In DemoulinS.LeyensJ. P.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), Intergroup misunderstandings: Impact of divergent social realities (pp. 291–310). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
