Selfish pursuits of personal goals in group contexts may conflict with the group goal. Drawing on the shared reality theory and the intersubjective consensus approach to cultural dynamics, however, we propose that commitment to personal goals would be accompanied by greater group identification when individual group members realize that their personal goals are widely shared in the group. In one experiment (Study 1), we manipulated perceived sharedness of personal goals and found that commitment to personal goals correlated positively with group identification only when participants learned that their goals were shared. Subsequent surveys that incorporated a 3-month longitudinal design (Studies 2 and 3) further confirmed that goal commitment and alignment with personal goals predicted group identification only when the goals were shared in the group.
AubéC.RousseauV. (2005). Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: The role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9, 189–204.
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
3.
BrewerM. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In BrewerM. B.CollinsB. E. (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 345–360). New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
4.
ChenF. F.KenrickD. T. (2002). Repulsion or attraction? Group membership and assumed attitude similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 111–125.
5.
ChiuC-y.GelfandM.YamagishiT.ShteynbergG.WanC. (2010). Intersubjective culture: The role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 482–493.
6.
ChiuC-y.KimY.-H.ChaturvediA. (2010). Collective evolution: Revisiting the Donald Campbell legacy. In SchallerM.NorenzayanA.HeineS. J.YamagishiA. T.KamedaT. (Eds.), Evolution, culture, and the human mind (pp. 39–47). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
7.
De CremerD.van KnippenbergD.van DijkE.van LeeuwenE. (2008). Cooperating if one’s goals are collective-based: Social identification effects in social dilemmas as a function of goal transformation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(6), 1562–1579.
8.
De CremerD.van VugtM. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871–893.
9.
DoosjeB.EllemersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
10.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.GrollS. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257–276.
11.
HardinC.HigginsE. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In SorrentinoR. M.HigginsT. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 28–84). New York, NY: Guilford.
12.
HeylighenF.CampbellD. T. (1995). Selection of organization at the societal level: Obstacles and facilitators of metasystem transitions. World Futures: The Journal of General Evolution, 45, 181–212.
13.
HigginsE. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
14.
HinszV. B.NickellG. S. (2004). Positive reactions to working in groups in a study of group and individual goal decision making. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 253–264.
15.
HoggM. A.HardieE. A.ReynoldsK. J. (1995). Prototypical similarity, self-categorization, and depersonalized attraction: A perspective on group cohesiveness. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 159–177.
16.
IpG. W.-M.ChiuC-y.WanC. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368–381.
17.
JehnK. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
18.
KramerR. M.BrewerM. B.HannaB. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In KramerR. M.TylerT. R. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357–389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
LauI. Y.-M.ChiuC-y.LeeS.-L. (2001). Communication and shared reality: Implications for the psychological foundations of culture. Social Cognition, 19, 350–371.
20.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 701–717.
22.
LuceR. D.RaiffaH. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. London, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
23.
RennR. W. (2003). Moderation by goal commitment of the feedback–performance relationship: Theoretical explanation and preliminary study. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 561–580.
24.
ShteynbergG.GelfandM. J.KimK. (2009). Peering into the “magnum mysterium” of culture: The explanatory power of descriptive norms. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40, 46–69.
25.
StewartG. L.BarrickM. R. (2000). Team structure and performance: Assessing the mediating role of intrateam process and the moderating role of task type. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 135–148.
26.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
27.
WanC.ChiuC-y. (2009). An intersubjective consensus approach to culture: The role of intersubjective norms versus cultural self in cultural processes In WyerR. B.ChiuC-y.HongY.-Y. (Eds.), Explaining culture: Theory, research, and application (pp. 79–92). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
WanC.ChiuC-y.PengS.TamK.-P. (2007). Measuring cultures through intersubjective norms: Implications for predicting relative identification with two or more cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 213–226.
29.
WanC.ChiuC-y.TamK. P.LeeS.LauI.PengS. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 337–354.
30.
WanC.TamK.-P.ChiuC-y. (2010). Intersubjective cultural representations predicting behavior: The case of political culture and voting. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 260–273.
31.
WanC.TorelliC.ChiuC-y. (2010). Intersubjective consensus and the maintenance of normative shared reality. Social Cognition, 28, 422–446.
32.
WeggeJ. (2000). Participation in group goal setting: Some novel findings and a comprehensive model as a new ending to an old story. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 498–516.
33.
WeldonE.WeingartL. R. (1993). Group goals and group performance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 307–334.
34.
ZouX.TamK.-P.MorrisM. W.LeeS.-L.LauY.-M.ChiuC-y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus vs. personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579–597.
