This study investigated the combined influence of wealth and power on discrimination. Participants (N = 243) were assigned to a 2 (ingroup wealth: rich/poor) × 2 (ingroup power: dominant/subordinate) × 2 (outgroup target wealth: rich/poor) minimal group study. After personally receiving money depending on their group ascription, participants distributed their personal money to ingroup and outgroup others. Overall, regardless of their wealth or power, participants discriminated against outgroup members. Poor group members discriminated more than rich group members and participants discriminated more when the outgroup was rich than when it was poor. Results suggest that social identity and group interest but not self-interest, explain discriminatory behaviors within wealth and power intergroup structures.
AmiotC.BourhisR. Y. (2005a). Discrimination between dominant and subordinate groups: The positive–negative asymmetry effect and normative processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 289–308.
2.
AmiotC.BourhisR. Y. (2005b). Ideological beliefs as determinants of discrimination in positive and negative outcome distributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 581–598.
3.
BerdahlJ. L.MartoranaP. (2006). Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 497–509.
4.
BourhisR. Y. (1994). Power, gender, and intergroup discrimination: Some minimal group experiments. In ZannaM.OlsonJ. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (pp. 171–208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BourhisR. Y.GagnonA. (2001). Social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. In BrownR.GaertnerS. (Eds.), Intergroup processes: Blackwell handbook in social psychology (pp. 89–111). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
BourhisR. Y.SachdevI.GagnonA. (1994). Conducting intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Some methodological notes. In ZannaM.OlsonJ. (Eds.), The Ontario symposium: The psychology of prejudice (pp. 209–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BrauerM.BourhisR. Y. (2006). Social power. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 601–616.
8.
CannadineD. (1990). The decline and fall of the British aristocracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
DiehlM. (1990). The minimal group paradigm: Theoretical explanations and empirical findings. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 1, 263–292). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
10.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.
11.
FurnhamA.ArgyleM. (1998). The psychology of money. London, UK: Routledge.
12.
GaertnerL.InskoC. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77–94.
13.
GagnonA.BourhisR. Y. (1996). Discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Social identity or self-interest?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1289–1301.
14.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
15.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1465.
16.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectivation of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127.
17.
HewstoneM.RubinM.WillisH. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.
18.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1988). Social identification: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
JostJ. T.BurgessD.MossoC. (Eds.). (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In JostJ. T.MajorB. (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363–388). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LipsetS. M.BendixR. (1959). Social mobility in industrial society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
MarxK. (1967). Capital. New York, NY: International Publishers. (Original work published 1867)
23.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351.
24.
PerreaultS.BourhisR. Y. (1998). Social identification, interdependence and discrimination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 49–66.
25.
RabbieJ. M.SchotJ. C.VisserL. (1989). Social identity theory: A conceptual and empirical critique from the perspective of a behavioural interaction model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 171–202.
26.
RatnerR. K.MillerD. T. (2001). The norm of self-interest and its effects on social action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 5–16.
27.
RubinM.HewstoneM. (1998). Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: A review and some suggestions for clarification. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 40–62.
28.
SabineB. E. V. (1966). A history of income tax. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
29.
SachdevI.BourhisR. Y. (1985). Social categorization and power differentials in group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 415–434.
30.
SachdevI.BourhisR. Y. (1987). Status differentials and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 277–293.
31.
SachdevI.BourhisR. Y. (1991). Power and status differentials in minority/majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 1–24.
32.
SpilermanS. (2000). Wealth and stratification processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 497–524.
33.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.
34.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AutinW. G. (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
35.
TurnerJ. C.BourhisR. Y. (1996). Social identity, interdependence and the social group: A reply to Rabbie et al. In RobinsonW. P. (Ed.), Social groups and identities: Developing the legacy of Henri Tajfel (pp. 25–63). Oxford, UK: Butterworth/Heinemann.
36.
TylerT. R. (2001). Social justice. In BrownR.GaertnerS. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology. Volume 4: Intergroup processes (pp. 344–366). London, UK: Blackwell.
37.
VohsK. D.MeadN. L.GoodeM. R. (2006). Merely Activating the Concept of Money Changes Personal and Interpersonal Behavior. Science, 314, 1154–1156.
38.
WebberC.WildavskyA. (1986). A history of taxation and expenditure in the Western world. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
