Team diversity may lead to a categorization of teammates as ingroup versus outgroup members. Therefore, the question arises whether there would be more permissiveness in reaction to ingroup free-riders than outgroup free-riders. To test this hypothesis, subjects were randomly assigned to one of two reward conditions (equity versus equality) and had to work with a partner who obviously underachieved and supposedly belonged to the same or a different group with regard to cognitive style. In addition, we assessed subjects’ individual sensitivity to equity norms, assuming that this would be a further moderator of the sucker effect. As expected, significant interaction effects on individual performance occurred for both variables.
AbeleS.DiehlM. (2008). Finding team-mates who are not prone to sucker and free-rider effects: The Protestant work ethic as a moderator of motivation losses in group performance. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11, 53–68.
2.
AdamsJ. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequality. Journal of Abnormal and Normal Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.
3.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
4.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
ArnscheidR.DiehlM.StroebeW. (1997). Motivationsverluste in Gruppen: Ein empirischer Test einer theoretischen Integration [Lack of motivation in groups: An empirical test of a theoretical integration]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 28, 241–250.
6.
BornsteinG.ErevI. (1994). The enhancing effect of intergroup competition on group performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 271–283.
7.
BrewerM. B.KramerR. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549.
CartwrightD.ZanderA. (1968). Group Dynamics: Research and Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
DawesR. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.
11.
DoosjeB.EllemersN.SpearsR. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410–436.
12.
DoosjeB.SpearsR.KoomenW. (1995). When bad isn’t all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642–655.
13.
DükerH.LienertG. A. (1959). Der Konzentrationsleistungstest (K-L-T) [Concentration achievement test]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
14.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
FieldingK. S.HoggM. A. (2000). Working hard to achieve self-defining group goals: A social identity analysis. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 31, 191–203.
16.
GockelC.KerrN. L.SeokD.-H.HarrisD. W. (2008). Indispensability and group identification as sources of task motivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1316–1321.
17.
HarkinsS. G.PettyR. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214–1229.
18.
HarkinsS. G.SzymanskiK. (1989). Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 934–941.
19.
HaslamS. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
20.
HertelG.KerrN. L.MesséL. A. (2000). Motivation gains in groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical advances on the Koehler effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 580–601.
21.
HomansG. C. (1958). Human behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.
22.
HomansG. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
23.
JamesK.GreenbergJ. (1989). In-group salience, intergroup comparison, and individual performance and self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 604–616.
24.
KarauS. J.HartJ. W. (1998). Group cohesiveness and social loafing: Effects of a social interaction manipulation on individual motivation within groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 185–191.
25.
KarauS. J.WilliamsK. D. (1997). The effects of group cohesiveness on social loafing and social compensation. Group Dynamics, 1, 156–168.
26.
KerrN. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819–823.
27.
KerrN. L. (1986). Motivational choices in task groups: A paradigm for social dilemma research. In WilkeH. A. M.MessickD. A.RutteC. G. (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas. Frankfurt am Main: Lang GmbH.
28.
KerrN. L.BruunS. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78–94.
29.
KerrN. L.HymesR. W.AndersonA. B.WeathersJ. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgements. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.
30.
KerrN. L.SeokD.-H.PoulsenJ. R.HarrisD. W.MesséL. A. (2008). Social ostracism and group motivation gain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 736–746.
31.
KingW. C.MilesE. W. (1994). The measurement of equity sensitivity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67, 133–142.
32.
KöhlerO. (1926). Kraftleistungen bei Einzel- und Gruppenarbeit [Physical performance in individual and group situations]. Industrielle Psychotechnik, 3, 274–282.
33.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
34.
LountR. B.PhillipsK. W. (2007). Working harder with the out-group: The impact of social category diversity on motivation gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 214–224.
35.
OrbellJ.DawesR. (1981). Social dilemmas. In StephensonG.DavisJ. H. (Eds.), Progress in applied social psychology (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley.
36.
SauleyK. S.BedeianA. G. (2000). Equity sensitivity: Construction of a measure and examination of its psychometric properties. Journal of Management, 26, 885–910.
37.
SteinerI. D. (1972). Group process and group productivity. New York: Academic Press.
38.
StroebeW.DiehlM.AbakoumkinG. (1996). Social compensation and the Köhler effect. In WitteE.DavisJ. H. (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39.
StroebeW.FreyB. S. (1982). Self-interest and collective action: The economics and psychology of public goods. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 121–137.
40.
TajfelH.BilligM. G.BundyR. P.FlamentC. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.
41.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinL. W. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
42.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
43.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
44.
Van ProoijenJ.-W. (2006). Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: The importance of social categorizations and guilt probability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 715–726.
45.
WalsterE.WalsterG.BerscheidE. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
46.
WilliamsK.HarkinsS.LatanéB. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303–311.
47.
WilliamsK. D.KarauS. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectation of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570–581.
48.
WorchelS.RothgerberH.DayE. A.HartD.ButemeyerJ. (1998). Social identity and individual productivity within groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 389–413.
