Does social identification protect or harm targets of discrimination? Two studies (N = 52, N = 94) tested the prediction that perceived legitimacy moderates the impact of social identification on negative responses to discrimination. Results confirm that when discrimination is perceived as illegitimate, identification is negatively related to self-directed anger (buffering effect) because identification provides a feeling of in-group support. However, when discrimination is perceived as legitimate, identification is positively related to self-directed anger (exacerbating effect) because the internalized social identity is perceived as legitimate target for the negative treatment. Legitimacy is measured and manipulated among different low-status groups. The legitimization and internalization of discrimination driven by self-directed anger are discussed.
ArmentaB. E.HuntJ. S. (2009). Responding to societal devaluation: Effects of perceived personal and group discrimination on the ethnic group identification and personal self-esteem of Latino/Latina adolescents. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 23–39.
2.
BlascovichJ.SpencerS.J.QuinnD.SteeleC. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological Science, 12, 225–229.
3.
BranscombeN. R.SchmittM. T.HarveyR. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135–149.
4.
BrownR.CondorS.MatthewsA.WadeG.WilliamsJ. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273–286.
5.
CrabtreeJ. W.HaslamS. A.PostmesT.HaslamC. (2010). Mental health support groups, stigma, and self-esteem: Positive and negative implications of group identification. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 553–569.
6.
CrockerJ.CornwellB.MajorB. (1993). The stigma of overweight: Affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 60–70.
7.
EllsworthP. C.TongE. M. W. (2006). What does it mean to be angry at yourself? Categories, appraisals, and the problem of language. Emotion, 6, 572–586.
8.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
HansenN.SassenbergK. (2006). Does social identification buffer or harm? The impact of social identification on anger after illegitimate discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 983–996.
10.
LalondeR. N.CameronJ. E. (1994). Behavioral responses to discrimination: A focus on action. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (vol. 7, pp. 257–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
LeachC. W.IyerA.PedersenA. (2006). Anger and guilt about in-group advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232–1245.
12.
MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (2002). Intergroup emotions and the social self: Prejudice reconceptualized as differentiated responses to outgroups. In ForgasJ. P.WilliamsK. D. (Eds.), The social self: Cognitive, interpersonal, and intergroup perspectives (pp. 309–326). New York: Psychology Press.
13.
MajorB.GramzowR.McCoyS. K.LevinS.SchmaderT.SidaniusJ. (2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269–282.
14.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL. T.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: Implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086.
15.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
16.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2003). Group identification moderates emotional responses to perceived prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1005–1017.
17.
Mendoza-DentonR.HansenN. (2008). Networks of meaning: Intergroup relations, cultural worldviews, and knowledge activation principles. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 68–83.
18.
MummendeyA.OttenS. (2004). Aversive discrimination. In BrewerM. B.HewstoneM. (Eds.), Emotion and motivation (pp. 298–318). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
19.
O’BrienL. T.MajorB. (2005). System justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The role of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1718–1729.
20.
PennerL. A.AlbrechtT. L.ColemanD. K.NortonW. E. (2007). Interpersonal Perspectives on Black-White health disparities: Social policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1, 63–98.
21.
PhinneyJ. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescence and adulthood: A review and integration. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499–514.
22.
SassenbergK.FehrJ.HansenN.MatschkeC.WoltinK. A. (2007). Eine sozialpsychologische Analyse zur Reduzierung sozialer Diskriminierung von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund. [A social-psychological analysis on how to reduce the illegitimate discrimination of migrants]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 239–249.
23.
SassenbergK.HansenN. (2007). The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to illegitimate discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 421–444.
24.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R. (2002). The internal and external causal loci of attribution to prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 484–492.
25.
SchmittM. T.BranscombeN. R.PostmesT. (2003). Women’s emotional responses to the pervasiveness of gender discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 297–312.
26.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27.
SmithT. W.GlazerK.RuizJ. M.GalloL. C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. Journal of Personality, 72, 1217–1270.
28.
StroebeK. E.EllemersN.BarretoM.MummendeyA. (2009). For better or for worse: The congruence of personal and group outcomes on targets’ reponses to discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 576–591.
29.
SwimJ. K.HyersL. L.CohenL. L.FergusonM. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.
30.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
31.
TangneyJ.WagnerP. E.Hill-BarlowD.MarschallD. E.GramzowR. (1996). Relation of shame and guilt to constructive versus destructive responses to anger across the lifespan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 797–809.
32.
VorauerJ. D.KumhyrS. (2001). Is this about you or me? Self- versus other-directed thoughts and feelings in response to intergroup interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 706–719.
33.
WrightS. C.TaylorD. M.MoghaddamF. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.
