Using a representative sample of Dutch adults (N = 1238), we investigated the moderating influence of direct contact and authoritarianism on the potential of extended contact to reduce prejudice. As expected, direct contact and authoritarianism moderated the effect of extended contact on prejudice. Moreover, the third-order moderation effect was also significant, revealing that extended contact has the strongest effect among high authoritarians with low levels of direct contact. We identified trust and perceived threat as the mediating processes underlying these moderation effects. The present study thus attests to the theoretical and practical relevance of reducing prejudice via extended contact. The discussion focuses on the role of extended contact in relation to direct contact and authoritarianism as well as on the importance of trust in intergroup contexts.
AbersonC. L.GaffneyA. M. (2009). An integrated threat model of explicit and implicit attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 808–830.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
AltemeyerR. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba Press.
4.
AltemeyerR. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 30, pp. 47–91). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5.
BillietJ.De WitteH. (1991). Naar racisme neigende houdingen in Vlaanderen: typologie en maatschappelijke achtergronden (Attitudes that tend towards racism in Flanders: typology and societal backgrounds). Leuven: Sociologisch Onderzoeksinstituut (SOI).
6.
CameronL.RutlandA. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice towards the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469–488.
7.
ChristO.HewstoneM.TauschN.WagnerU.VociA.HughesJ.CairnsE. (2010). Direct contact as a moderator of extended contact effects: Cross-sectional and longitudinal impact on outgroup attitudes, behavioral intentions, and attitude certainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36, 1662–1674.
8.
CohrsJ. C.AsbrockF. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270–289.
9.
DawesR. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review Psychology, 31, 169–193.
10.
DawsonJ. F.RichterA. W. (2006). Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 917–926.
11.
De CremerD.TylerT. R. (2005). Managing group behavior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 37, pp. 151–218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
DhontK.RoetsA.Van HielA. (in press). Opening Closed Minds: The Combined Effects of Intergroup Contact and Need for Closure on Prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
13.
DhontK.Van HielA. (2009). We must not be enemies: Interracial contact and the reduction of prejudice among authoritarians. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 172–177.
14.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L.KawakamiK.HodsonG. (2002). Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 88–102.
15.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113.
16.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
17.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice, European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.
18.
FunkeF. (2005). The dimensionality of right-wing authoritarianism: Lessons from the dilemma between theory and measurement. Political Psychology, 26, 195–218.
19.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.HambergerJ.NiensU. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “The Troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120.
20.
HodsonG. (2008). Interracial prison contact: The pros for (social dominant) cons. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 325–351.
21.
HodsonG. (in press). Authoritarian contact: From “tight circles” to cross-group friendships. In FunkeF.PetzelT.CohrsJ. C.DuckittJ. (Eds.) Perspectives on Authoritarianism. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS-Verlag.
22.
HodsonG.HarryH.MitchellA. (2009). Independent benefits of contact and friendship on attitudes toward homosexuals among authoritarians and highly identified heterosexuals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 509–525.
23.
HodsonG.HoggS. M.MacInnisC. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690.
24.
IslamM. R.HewstoneM. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived outgroup variability and outgroup attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700–710.
25.
JugertP.CohrsC.DuckittJ. (2009). Inter- and interpersonal processes underlying authoritarianism: The role of social conformity and personal need for structure. European Journal of Personality, 23, 607–621.
26.
LewickiR. J.McAllisterD. J.BiesR. J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of Management Review, 23, 438–458.
27.
LiebkindK.McAlisterA. L. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765–80.
28.
MirelsH. L.DeanJ. B. (2006). Right-wing authoritarianism, attitude salience, and beliefs about matters of fact. Political Psychology, 27, 839–866.
29.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
30.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.
31.
PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WagnerU.StellmacherJ. S. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup contact effects on prejudice: A normative interpretation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 31, 411–425.
32.
RiekB. M.ManiaE. W.GaertnerS. (2006). Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 336–353.
33.
RousseauD. M.SitkinS. M.BurtR. S.CamererC. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
34.
StephanW. G.RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threat in intergroup relations. In MackieD.SmithE. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 191–205. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
35.
StephanW. G.BonieckiK. A.YbarraO.BettencourtA.ErvinK. S.JacksonL. A.. . . RenfroC. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.
36.
TamT.HewstoneM.CairnsE.TauschN.MaioG.KenworthyJ. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136.
37.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2009). Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 45–59.
38.
TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ. B.CairnsE.MarinettiC.GeddesL.ParkinsonB. (2008). Postconflict Reconciliation: Intergroup forgiveness and implicit biases in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 303–320.
39.
TauschN.TamT.HewstoneM.KenworthyJ.CairnsE. (2007). Individual-level and group-level mediators of contact effects in Northern Ireland: The moderating role of social identification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 541–556.
40.
TurnerR.HewstoneM.VociA. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 369–388.
41.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.ChristO. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 212–255). Hove: Psychology Press.
42.
TurnerR.HewstoneM.VociA.VonofakouC. (2008). A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860.
43.
TroppL. R. (2008). The role of trust in intergroup contact: Its significance and implications for improving relations between groups. In WagnerU.TroppL. R.FinchilescuG.TredouxC. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 91–106). SPSSI Series on Social Issues and Interventions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
Van HielA.CornelisI.RoetsA. (2007). The intervening role of social worldviews in the relationship between the five-factor model of personality and social attitudes. European Journal of Personality, 21, 131–148.
45.
Van HielA.CornelisI.RoetsA.De ClercqB. (2007). A comparison of various authoritarianism scales in Belgian Flanders. European Journal of Personality, 21, 149–168.
46.
Van HielA.MervieldeI. (2002). Explaining conservative beliefs and political preferences: A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 965–976.
47.
Van HielA.MervieldeI. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relationships with various forms of racism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2323–2344.
48.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice towards immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54.
49.
VonofakouC.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.TurnerR. N.TauschN. T.. . . CairnsE. (2008). The impact of direct and extended cross-group friendships on improving intergroup relations. In WagnerU.TroppL. R.FinchilescuG.TredouxC. (Eds.), Improving intergroup relations: Building on the legacy of Thomas F. Pettigrew (pp. 107–123). SPSSI Series on Social Issues and Interventions. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
50.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.
