This research examines quasi-experimentally for the first time whether direct contact moderates the extended contact effect amongst children, and whether the extended contact effect is mediated by either in-group or out-group norms about cross-ethnic friendships. We tested two forms of extended contact (Dual identity and Common in-group identity) among ethnic majority children aged 6–11 years (white–English, n = 153) with differing levels of high quality (i.e., cross-ethnic friendships) or low quality (i.e., acquaintances) direct contact with the Indian–English out-group. As expected, the extended contact effect was demonstrated only amongst children who reported less high quality direct contact. Furthermore, we found the effect of extended contact was mediated by out-group norms. We also found evidence of moderated mediation, with the indirect effect of extended contact through in-group norms being significantly stronger amongst older children. The implications for extended contact theory and the future development of prejudice-reduction interventions amongst children are discussed.
AboudF. E.MendelsonM. J.PurdyK. T. (2003). Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 165–173.
2.
AboudF. E.SankarJ. (2007). Friendship and identity in a language-intergrated school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 445–453.
3.
AbramsD.HoggM. A.MarquesJ. M. (Eds.). (2005). The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
AbramsD.RutlandA. (2008). The development of subjective group dynamics. In LevyS.KillenM. (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
AbramsD.RutlandA.CameronL. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: Children’s judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals. Child Development, 74, 1840–1856.
6.
AbramsD.RutlandA.PelletierJ.FerrellJ. (2009). Children’s group nous: understanding and applying peer exclusion within and between groups. Child Development, 80, 224–243.
7.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
9.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
10.
BradleyJ. V. (1982). The insidious L-shaped distribution. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 85–88.
11.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 255–343.
12.
CameronL.RutlandA. (2006). Extended contact through story reading in school: Reducing children’s prejudice towards the disabled. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 469–488.
13.
CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR. J. (2007). Promoting children’s positive intergroup attitudes towards stigmatized groups: Extended contact and multiple classification skills training. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31(5), 454–466.
14.
CameronL.RutlandA.BrownR. J.DouchR. (2006). Changing children’s intergroup attitudes toward refugees: Testing different models of extended contact. Child Development, 77(5), 1208–1219.
15.
CastelliL.De AmicisL.ShermanS. J. (2007). The loyal member effect: On the preference for ingroup members who engage in exclusive relations with the ingroup. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1347–1359.
16.
CrandallC. S.EshlemanA.O’BrienL. (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.
17.
De Tezanos-PintoP.BrattC.BrownR. J. (2010). What will others think? In-group norms as a mediator of the effects of intergroup contact. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 507–523.
18.
FeddesA. R.NoackP.RutlandA. (2009). Direct and extended friendship effects on minority and majority children’s interethnic attitudes: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 80, 337–390.
19.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Hove: Psychology Press.
20.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (2005). Categorization, recategorization and intergroup bias. In DovidioJ. F.GlickP.RudmanL. A. (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 71–88). Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.GuerraR.RebeloM.MonteiroM. B.RiekB. M.HouletteM. A. (2008). The common in-group identity model: applications to children and adults. In LevyS. R.KillenM. (Eds.), Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood (pp. 204–219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
HewstoneM.BrownR. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the “Contact Hypothesis”. In HewstoneM.BrownR. (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1–44). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23.
HouletteM.GaertnerS. L.JohnsonK. M.BankerB. S.RiekB. M.DovidioJ. F. (2004). Developing a more inclusive social identity: An elementary school intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 35–56.
24.
JacksonM. F.BarthJ. M.PowellN.LochmanJ. E. (2006). Classroom contextual effects of race on children’s peer nominations. Child Development, 77(5), 1325–1337.
25.
MacKinnonD. P.WarsiG.DwyerJ. H. (1995). A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 41–62.
26.
MarquesJ. M.AbramsD.PaezD.HoggM. A. (2001). Social categorization, social identification, and rejection of deviant group members. In HoggM. A.TindaleR. S. (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 3): Group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 400–424). Oxford: Blackwell.
27.
McGlothlinH.KillenM. (2006). Intergroup attitudes of European American children attending ethnically homogeneous schools. Child Development, 77(5), 1375–1386.
28.
NesdaleD.MaassA.DurkinK.GriffithsJ. (2005). Group norms, threat, and children’s racial prejudice. Child Development, 76(3), 652–663.
29.
NigburD.BrownR. J.CameronL.HossainR.LanduaA. R.Le TouzeD. S.WattersC. (2008). Acculturation, well-being and classroom behavior among white British and British Asian primary-school children in the south-east of England: Validating a child-friendly measure of acculturation attitudes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 493–504.
30.
PaluckE. L.GreenD. L. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A review and assessment of research and practice. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339–367.
31.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE. (2007). Direct and indirect intergroup friendships effects: Testing the moderating role of the affective and cognitive bases of prejudice. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1406–1420.
32.
PaoliniS.HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholic and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 770–786.
33.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
34.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
35.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate behvioral Research, 42, 185–227.
36.
RubleD. N.AlvarezJ.BachmanM.CameronJ.FuligniA.CollC. G. (2004). The development of a sense of “we”: The emergence and implications of children’s collective identity. In BennettM.SaniF. (Eds.), The development of the social self (pp. 29–76). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
37.
RutlandA.BrownR. J.CameronL.AhmavaaraA.ArnoldK.SamsonJ. (2007). Development of the positive-negative asymmetry effect: In-group exclusion norm as a mediator of children’s evaluations on negative attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 171–190.
38.
RutlandA.CameronL.MilneA.McGeorgeP. (2005). Social norms and self-presentation: Children’s implicit and explicit intergroup attitudes. Child Development, 76(2), 451–466.
39.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (1996). Using Multivariate Statistics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
40.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. (Eds.), Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.
41.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and attitude-behaviour relationships: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–793.
42.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.PaoliniS.ChristO. (2007). Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 212–255.
43.
TurnerR. N.HewstoneM.VociA.VonofakouC. (2008). A test of the extended contact hypothesis: The mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 843–860.
44.
TurnerR. N.VociA.HewstoneM. (2007). Reducing explicit and implicit outgroup prejudice via direct and extended contact: The mediating role of self-disclosure and intergroup anxiety. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 93(3), 369–388.
45.
WrightS. C.AronA.McLaughlin-VolpeT.RoppS. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73–90.
