The aim of the current study was to show that the type of conflict behavior (constructive vs. unconstructive) groups use in conflicts depends on their power position as well as the likelihood that power determines victory and defeat. In an alleged online debate, we created a conflict between two opinion based groups. We then measured participant’s action tendencies and their actual behavior. Overall, the results show that especially when the likelihood that power determines victory and defeat is low, power plays a role: those low in power become more constructive, while those high in power show no constructive behavior at all. Next to that, powerless groups tend to behave more unconstructively when it is likely that power detremines victory and defeat. The implications for intergroup relations are discussed.
Cicchetti, D.V., & Sparrow, S.A. ( 1981). Developing criteria for establishing interraterreliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Deficiency, 86, 127-137.
2.
De Dreu, C.K.W. ( 2010). Social conflict: the emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In S.T. Fiske, D.T Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology (5th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 983-1023). New York: Wiley.
3.
Deutsch, M. ( 1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. New Haven, CT; Yale University Press.
4.
Devos, T., Silver, L.A., Mackie, D.M., & Smith, E.R. ( 2002). Experiencing intergroup emotions. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.). From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Different emotional reactions to social groups (pp. 111-134). New York: Psychology Press.
5.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. ( 1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming: Towards the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 392-403.
6.
Ebenbach, D.H., & Keltner, D. ( 1998). Power, emotion, and judgmental accuracy in social conflict: Motivating the cognitive miser. Basic and Applied Social Psychology , 20,7-21.
7.
Galinsky, A., Gruenfeld, D., & Magee, J. ( 2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453-466.
8.
Giebels, E., & Euwema, M. ( 2006). Conflictmanagement: Analyse, Diagnostiek en Interventie[Conflict management: Analysis, diagnostics and intervention]. Groningen /Houten: Wolters-Noordhoff.
9.
Hornsey, M.J., Spears, R., Cremers, I., & Hogg, M.A. ( 2003). Relations between high and low-power groups: The importance of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin ,29, 216-227.
10.
Iyer, A., & Leach, C. ( 2008). Emotion in intergroup relations. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 86-125.
Kamans, E., Otten, S., & Gordijn, E.H. (in press). Power and threat in intergroup conflict: How emotional and behavioural reactions depend on amount and content of threat. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations.
13.
Kamans, E., Spears, R., Otten, S., Gordijn, E.H., & Livingstone, A.G. (2009). When the weak hit back: Different routes to offensive resistance in powerless, low status groups. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14.
Kelley, H.H., & Thibaut, J. ( 1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence .New York: Academic Press.
15.
Lammers, J., Galinsky, A.D., Gordijn, E.H., Otten, S. ( 2008). Illegitimacy moderates the effects of power on approach . Psychological Science, 19, 558-564.
16.
Leach, C.W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002) ‘Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate’: The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith, (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration . (pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Mackie, D.M., Devos, T. & Smith, E.R. ( 2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroupcontext. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
Postmes, T., & Smith, L. ( 2009). Why do the privileged resort to oppression? A look at some intragroup factors. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 769-790.
20.
Pruitt. D. G., & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict . Buckingham: Open University Press .
21.
Raven, B.H. & French, Jr., J.R.P. ( 1958). Legitimate power, coercive power, and observability in social Influence. Sociometry, 21,83-97.
22.
Schaller, M., & Abeysinghe, A.M.N.D. (2006). Geographical frame of reference and dangerous intergroup attitudes: A double-minority study in Sri-Lanka. Political Psychology, 27, 615-631.
23.
Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. ( 2004). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42,192-200.
24.
Schelling, T. ( 1960). The strategy of conflict. Oxford England: Harvard University Press.
Spears, R., Greenwood, R., De Lemus, S., & Sweetman, J. (in press). Legitimacy, social identity and power. In A. Guinote & T. Vescio (Eds). The social psychology of power. Guilford: New York.
27.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of social conflict. In W. G Austin., & S. Worchel (Eds.), The psychology of intergroup relations . (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
28.
Tausch, N., Becker, J., Spears, R., & Christ, O. ( 2009). Emotion and efficacy pathways to normative and non-normative collective action. Manuscript in preparation, University of Cardiff.
29.
Turner, J.C.,& Brown, R. ( 1978). Social status, cognitive alternatives and intergroup relations. In H. Tajfel (Ed.) Differentiation between social groups: Studies in social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 201-234). London: Academic Press.
30.
Van de Vliert, E. ( 1997). Complex interpersonal conflcit behaviour. East Sussex: Psychology Press Ltd.
31.
Van Kleef, G., De Dreu, C., Pietroni, D., & Manstead, A. ( 2006). Power and emotion in negotiation: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 557-581.
32.
Wright, S.C., Taylor, D.M., and Moghaddam, F.M. ( 1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: from acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
