Why do people persistently contribute to public goods and does it matter to them if their donation makes a difference? A costly signalling perspective suggests that donors might be more concerned about their reputation than the utility of their helping act. We report data on two step-level public goods experiments. We find that in public (vs. private) conditions, contributions go up even when the public good is already provided (Experiment 1) or is unattainable (Experiment 2). Furthermore, these conspicuous donations appear to enhance the status and prestige of the donor because they signal some hidden quality. This research suggests that a public good contribution can be a self-presentation strategy and that the benefits of these contributions to society are sometimes of secondary importance.
Andreoni, J. ( 1995). Cooperation in public goods experiments: Kindness or confusion? American Economic Review, 85, 891-904.
2.
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. ( 2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2, 412-414.
3.
Bliege Bird, R., & Smith, E.A. ( 2005). Signaling theory, strategic interaction, and symbolic capital. Current Anthropology, 46, 221-248.
4.
Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., & Reno, R.R. ( 1991). A focus theory of normative conduct. In L. Berkowitz, Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 201-234). New York: Academic Press.
5.
De Cremer, D., Snyder, M., & De Witte, S. ( 2001). The less I trust the less I contribute (or not)? European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 93-107.
6.
De Cremer, D., & Van Vugt, M. ( 1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871-893.
Fox, J., & Guyer, M. ( 1978). Public choice and cooperation in n-person prisoner s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 22, 469-481.
9.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur J.M., Sundie. J.M., Cialdini, R.B., Miller, G.F., & Kenrick, D.T. ( 2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 85-102.
10.
Haley, K.J., & Fessler, D.M.T. (2005). Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245-256.
11.
Hamilton, W.D. ( 1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior, I, II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1-52.
12.
Harbaugh, W. ( 1998). The prestige motive for charitable transfers. American Economic Review, 88, 277-282.
13.
Hardy, C., & Van Vugt, M. ( 2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402-1413.
14.
Iredale, W., Van Vugt, M., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2008). Showing off in humans: Male generosity as mate signal. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 386-392.
15.
Jerdee, T.H., & Rosen, B. ( 1974). Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behaviour in the common interest. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 59, 712-716.
16.
Kerr, N.L. ( 1989). Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 287-313.
17.
Kerr, N.L., & Tindale, R.S. ( 2004). Group performance and decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655.
18.
Komorita, S. & Parks, C.D. ( 1994). Social dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
19.
McAndrew, F. ( 2002). New evolutionary perspectives on altruism: Multi-level selection and costly signaling theories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 79-82.
20.
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Krambeck, H., & Marotzke, J. ( 2006). Stabilizing the Earth s climate is not a losing game: Supporting evidence from public goods experiments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 3994-3998.
21.
Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind. London: Vintage .
22.
Millet, K., & Dewitte, S. ( 2007). Altruistic behaviour as a general sign of intelligence . Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 316-326.
23.
Nowak, M.A., & Sigmund, K. ( 1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 373, 573-577.
24.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Roberts, G. ( 1998). Competitive altruism: From reciprocity to the handicap principle. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 265, 427-431.
26.
Sozou, P.D., & Seymour, R.M. ( 2005). Costly but worthless gifts facilitate courtship. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, B, 272, 1877-1884.
27.
Spence, M. ( 1973). Job market signalling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355-374.
28.
Trivers, R. ( 1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35-57.
29.
Van Lange, P.A.M., & Kuhlman, D.M. ( 1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126-141.
30.
Van Vugt, M., Roberts, G., & Hardy, C. ( 2007). Competitive altruism: Development of reputation-based cooperation in groups. In R. Dunbar & L. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Van Vugt, M., Snyder, M., Tyler, T., & Biel, A. ( 2000). Cooperation in modern society: Promoting the welfare of communities, states, and organizations. London: Routledge.
32.
Van Vugt, M., & Van Lange, P. ( 2006). Psychological adaptations for prosocial behaviour: The altruism puzzle. In M. Schaller, D. Kenrick, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Evolution and social psychology (pp. 237-261). New York: Psychology Press.
33.
Veblen, T. ([ 1899] 1973). The theory of the leisure class. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
Zahavi, A., & Zahavi, A. ( 1997). The handicap principle: A missing piece of Darwin s puzzle . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
