The current study examines perceived status differences among ethnic groups. Consistent with a group dominance perspective, three samples of American university students revealed that perceived ethnic status differences increased to the extent that individuals had low ethnic status, perceived their society to be unfair, and were lower on social dominance orientation. In addition, social dominance orientation moderated the relationship between perceived status differences and perceived societal fairness such that perceived unfairness was associated with perceived status differences only for those low on social dominance orientation. Discussion suggests that variability in perceived status differences stems from group position, and that understanding the origins of individuals’ perceptions of status differences may be a basic and necessary step to improve intergroup relations.
Anderson, C., Srivastava, S., Beer, J.S., Spataro, S.E., & Chatman, J.A. ( 2006). Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1094-1110.
3.
Brodish, A.B., Brady, P.C., & Devine, P.G. ( 2008). More eyes on the prize: Variability in White Americans’ perceptions of progress toward racial equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 513-527.
4.
Brown, R. ( 2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology , 30, 745-778.
5.
Corenblum, B., & Stephan, W.G. ( 2001). White fears and native apprehensions: An integrated threat theory approach to intergroup attitudes. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 33, 251-268.
6.
Dijksterhuis, A., van Knippenberg, A., Kruglanski, A.W., & Schaper, C. ( 1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 32, 254-270.
7.
Eibach, R.P. & Ehrlinger, J. ( 2006). Keep your eyes on the prize: Reference points and racial differences in assessing progress toward equality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 66-77.
8.
Federico, C.M., & Levin, S. ( 2004). Intergroup biases as a function of reflected status appraisals and support for legitimizing ideologies: Evidence from the USA and Israel . Social Justice Research, 17, 47-73.
9.
Hagendoorn, L. ( 1995). Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology , 6, 199-228.
10.
Hagendoorn, L., Drogendijk, R., Tumanov, S., and Hraba, J. ( 1998). Inter-ethnic preferences and ethnic hierarchies in the former Soviet Union. International Journal on Intercultural Relations, 22, 483-503.
11.
Hinkle, S., & Brown, R. ( 1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. Hogg (Eds.), Advances in social identity theory (pp. 48-70). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
12.
Hraba, J., Hagendoorn, L., & Hagendoorn, R. (1989). The ethnic hierarchy in the Netherlands: Social distance and social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 57-69.
13.
Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. ( 2004). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. New York: Psychology Press.
14.
Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., & Nosek, B.A. ( 2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919.
15.
Jost, J.T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C.O. ( 2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
17.
Jost, J.T., Pelham, B.W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B.N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36.
18.
Levin, S. ( 2004). Perceived group status differences and the effects of gender, ethnicity, and religion on social dominance orientation. Political Psychology, 25, 31-48.
19.
Lowery, B.S., Knowles, E.D., & Unzueta, M.M. ( 2007). Framing inequity safely: Whites’ motivated perceptions of racial privilege. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 33, 1237-1250.
20.
Major, B., Gramzow, R.H., McCoy, S.K., Levin, S., Schmader, T., & Sidanius, J. ( 2002). Perceiving personal discrimination: The role of group status and legitimizing ideology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 269-282.
21.
Powell, A.A., Branscombe, N.R., & Schmitt, M.T. ( 2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508-521.
22.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. ( 1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
23.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C., & Pratto, F. ( 2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach . In J. Jost and B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J., & Pratto, F. ( 2000). Social dominance orientation, anti-egalitarianism and the political psychology of gender: An extension and cross-cultural replication . European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 41-67.
25.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. ( 1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 94-109). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
27.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1986). The social identity theory of inter-group conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago : Nelson-Hall.
28.
Turner, J.C. ( 1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Contexts, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
29.
Verkuyten, M., Hagendoorn, L., & Masson, K. ( 1996). The ethnic hierarchy among minority and majority youth in the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1104-1118.
