In two experiments ( n = 87 and n = 90), we showed that strongly identifying members of a low status group are more likely to actively inform the ingroup rather than the outgroup about an outgroup transgression, and consider it as more loyal to the ingroup to do so. Moreover, strongly identifying members of a high status group are more likely to actively inform the outgroup rather than the ingroup about an outgroup transgression, and consider this to be more loyal to the ingroup. The results are in support of the notion that, depending on a group’s existing status position, negative outgroup information can be used to enhance or confirm the ingroup’s standing, affecting whether the ingroup or the outgroup will initially be informed about an outgroup transgression.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (Eds.). (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf .
2.
Abrams, D., Marques, J.M., Bown, N., & Henson, M. ( 2000). Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 906-912.
3.
Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M.J., & Gallois, C. ( 2006). Group-directed criticism in Indonesia: Role of message source and audience. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 96-102.
4.
Branscombe, N., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. ( 1999). The context and content to social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford : Blackwell.
5.
Branscombe, N.R., & Wann, D.L. ( 1992). Role of identification with a group, arousal, categorization processes, and self-esteem in sports spectator aggression. Human Relations, 45, 1013-1033.
6.
Branscombe, N.R., & Wann, D.L. ( 1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
7.
Branscombe, N.R., Wann, D.L., Noel, J.G., & Coleman, J. ( 1993). In-group or out-group extremity: Importance of the threatened social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 19, 381-388.
8.
Dietz-Uhler, B. ( 1999). Defensive reactions to group relevant information. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 17-29.
9.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. ( 1999). Commitment and intergroup behaviour. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 84-106). Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
Elder, T.J., Sutton, R.M., & Douglas, K.M. ( 2005). Keeping it to ourselves: Effects of audience size and composition on reactions to criticisms of the ingroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 231-244.
11.
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology , 64, 766-778.
12.
Field, A. ( 2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
13.
Florack, A., Scarabis, M., & Gosejohann, S. (2005). The effects of self-image threat on the judgement of out-group targets. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 64, 87-101.
14.
Hornsey, M.J., de Bruin, P., Creed, J., Allen, J., Ariyanto, A., & Svensson, A. ( 2005). Keeping it in-house: How audience affects responses to group criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 291-312.
15.
Hornsey, M.J., & Imani, A. ( 2004). Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: An identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 365-383.
16.
Hornsey, M.J., Oppes, T., & Svensson, A. ( 2002). ‘It’s OK if we say it, but you can’t’: Responses to intergroup and intragroup criticism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 293-307.
17.
Jetten, J., Hornsey, M.J., Spears, R., Haslam, S.A., & Cowell, E. (in press). Rule transgressions in groups: The conditional nature of newcomers’ willingness to confront deviance. European Journal of Social Psychology.
18.
Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, S.R. (2001). Similarity as a source of differentiation: The role of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 621-640.
19.
Klandermans, B. ( 1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
20.
Leach, C.W., Spears, R., Branscombe, N.R., & Doosje, B. ( 2003). Malicious pleasure: Schadenfreude at the suffering of another group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 84, 932-943.
21.
Lemyre, L., & Smith, P.M. ( 1985). Intergroup discrimination and self-esteem in the minimal group paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 49, 660-670.
22.
Marques, J.M., Abrams, D., Paez, D., & Martinez-Taboada, C. (1998). The role of categorization and in-group norms in judgements of groups and their members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 976-988.
23.
Marques, J.M., Yzerbyt, V.Y., & Leyens, J. ( 1988). The ‘black sheep effect’: Extremity of judgements towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 1-16.
24.
Masser, B., & Brown, R. ( 1996). ‘When would you do it?’ An investigation into the effects of retaliation, seriousness of malpractice and occupation on willingness to blow the whistle. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 127-130.
25.
McAndrew, F.T., Bell, E.K., & Garcia, C.M. ( 2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 37, 1562-1577.
26.
McAndrew, F.T., & Milenkovic, M.A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1064-1082.
27.
Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. ( 1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing . Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1-16.
28.
Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. ( 1986). Retaliation against whistle blowers: Predictors and effects . Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 137-145.
29.
Near, J.P., & Miceli, M.P. ( 1995). Effective whistle-blowing. Academy of Management Review, 20, 679-708.
30.
Oakes, P.J., & Turner, J.C. ( 1980). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour: Does minimal intergroup discrimination make social identity more positive?European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 295-301.
31.
Soanes, C., & Stevenson, A. (Eds.) (2004). Concise Oxford English Dictionary (11th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
Spears, R., & Leach, C.W. ( 2004). Intergroup schadenfreude: Conditions and consequences . In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction (pp. 336-355). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Tajfel, H. ( 1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.
34.
Tajfel, H. ( 1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
35.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
36.
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J.C. ( 1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago : Nelson Hall.
37.
Turner, J.C. ( 1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford: Blackwell.
38.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
39.
van der Lee, R., van Leeuwen, E., & Hopman, P. ( 2008). When exposing a transgression is a transgression in itself: Responses to ingroup whistle-blowing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
40.
van Leeuwen, E., van den Bosch, M., Castano, E., & Hopman, P. (in press). Dealing with deviants: The effectiveness of rejection, denial, and apologies on protecting the public image of a group. European Journal of Social Psychology.
41.
van Prooijen, J.W. (in press). Retributive versus compensatory justice: Observers’ preference for punishing in response to criminal offences. European Journal of Social Psychology.
42.
van Zomeren, M., Spears, R., Fischer, A.H., & Leach, C.W. ( 2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 649-664.
43.
Weiner, B. ( 1995). Judgements of responsibility. New York: Guilford Press.
44.
Williams, K.D., Forgas, J.P., & von Hippel, W. (2005). The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York: Psychology Press.
