Two studies investigated how generalized uncertainty affects the tendency to coordinate perceptions of the ingroup with intergroup perceptions. Across two field studies, we found that uncertainty leads to a stronger association between the perceived entitativity of an ingroup and the extent of perceived attitude polarization between the ingroup and outgroup. Study 1 showed that, for striking grocery store employees, feelings of uncertainty were associated with enhanced coordination of ingroup entitativity and intergroup polarization. Study 2 primed Democrat and Republican partisans to feel either high uncertainty or high certainty. Those who felt uncertain associated their perceptions of their group's entitativity with perceived polarization of the two parties more strongly than did those who felt certain. Discussion centers on processes underlying the phenomena as well as the implications of the findings for political polarization in American society.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
Brown, C.B. (2008). Obama faces off against both Clintons. Retrieved February 11, 2008 from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0108/8002.html
3.
Burden, B.C. (2003). Uncertainty in American politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
5.
Cohen, G.L., Sherman, D.K., Bastardi, A., McGoey, M., Hsu, A., & Ross, L. (2007). Bridging the partisan divide: Self-affirmation reduces ideological closed-mindedness and inflexibility in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 415-430.
6.
Corneille, O., Klein, O., Lambert, S., & Judd, C.M. (2002). On the role of familiarity with units of measurement in categorical accentuation: Tajfel and Wilkes (1963) revisited and replicated . Psychological Science, 4, 380-383.
7.
Correll, J., & Park, B. (2005). A model of the ingroup as a social resource. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 341-359.
8.
Crump, S.A., Hamilton, D.L., Sherman, S.J., & Thakkar, V. (2008). Group entitativity and similarity: Their differing patterns in perceptions of groups. Manuscript under review.
9.
Davis, D. (2005). One state two state red state blue state. Shelbyville, KY: Wasteland Press.
10.
Denson, T., Lickel, B., Curtis, M., Stenstrom, D., & Ames, D.R. (2006). The roles of entitativity and essentiality in judgments of collective responsibility. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 43-62.
11.
Dunn, R.G. (1998). Identity crises: A social critique of postmodernity . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
12.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
13.
Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (2000). Bleeding hearts and the heartless: Popular perceptions of liberal and conservative ideologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 845-852.
14.
Fiorina, M.P., Abrams, S.J., & Pope, J.C. (2005). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
15.
Frank, T. (2004). What's the matter with Kansas? How conservatives won the heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
16.
Greenberg, D. (2004). Workers pressure union to resolve grocery strike . Los Angeles Business Journal. [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 19 January 2004 from http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-112896931.html
17.
Hamilton, D.L., Sherman, S.J., & Castelli, L. (2002). A group by any other name-The role of entitativity in group perception. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 139-166). Chichester , England: Wiley.
18.
Hamilton, D.L., Sherman, S.J., & Rodgers, J.S. (2004). Perceiving the groupness of groups: Entitativity, homogeneity, essentialism, and stereotypes. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 39-60). New York: Psychology Press.
19.
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113-127.
20.
Hogg, M.A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223-255.
21.
Hogg, M.A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479). New York: Guilford.
22.
Hogg, M.A. (2006). Social identity theory. In P. J. Burke (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 111-136). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
23.
Hogg, M.A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 39, pp. 69-126). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
24.
Hogg, M.A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Routledge.
25.
Hogg, M.A., Sherman, D.K., Dierselhuis, J., Maitner, A.T., & Moffitt, G. (2007). Uncertainty, entitativity, and identification . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 135-142.
26.
Ip, G.W.-M., Chiu, C-Y., & Wan, C. (2006). Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus group-based goal perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 368-381.
27.
Jensen, E. (2004, September 2). Fox news overtakes broadcast rivals: The cable channel's ratings victory in Republican convention coverage marks a turning point in viewers shifting allegiances. Los Angeles Times, p. A-28. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Postmes, T. (2004). Intergroup distinctiveness and differentiation: A meta-analytical investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 862-879.
28.
Jost, J.T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition . Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
29.
Kruglanski, A.W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review , 113, 84-100.
30.
Lambert, S.M., Hogg, M.A., Klein, M.A., Azzi, A.E., & Svensson, A. (2004). Subjective uncertainty and perceptual accentuation. Unpublished manuscript , Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
31.
Lickel, B., Hamilton, D.L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S.J., & Uhles, A.N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 78, 223-246.
32.
Marris, P. (1996). The politics of uncertainty: Attachment in private and public life. London: Routledge .
33.
Peltz, J.F., Fulmer, M., & White, R.D. (2004, February 27). Union, Stores Reach a Deal to End Strike. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
34.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004, June 8). News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audiences larger, more diverse. Retrieved February 21, 2007 from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=833
35.
Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2008, January 24). An even more partisan agenda for 2008: Election-year economic ratings lowest since '92. Retrieved February 11, 2008 from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=388
36.
Robbins, J.M., & Krueger, J.L. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47.
37.
Robinson, R.J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: "Naïve realism" in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 404-417.
38.
Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naïve realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In T. Brown, E. Reed, & E. Turiel (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 103-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11-36). London: SAGE.
40.
Seyle, D.C., & Newman, M.L. (2006). A house divided? The psychology of red and blue America. American Psychologist, 61, 571-580.
41.
Sherman, D.K., & Kim, H.S. (2005). Is there an "I" in "team"? The role of the self in group-serving judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 108-120.
42.
Sherman, D.K., Nelson, L.D., & Ross, L.D. (2003). Naïve realism and affirmative action: Adversaries are more similar than they think. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 275-290.
43.
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The psychological and cultural origins of genocide and other forms of group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
St. John, T. (2008). The last act. Retrieved February 11, 2008 from http://unitedhollywood.blogspot.com/2008/01/last-act.html
45.
Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative judgement in social perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 16-29.
46.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
47.
Tajfel, H. (1972). La categorization sociale [Social categorization] . In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larousse.
48.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
49.
Tajfel, H., & Wilkes, A.L. (1963). Classification and quantitative judgment. British Journal of Psychology, 54, 101-114.
50.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
Yzerbyt, V., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-P., & Paladino, M.-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 257-295.
52.
Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (Eds.). (2004). The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism. New York: Psychology Press.
