In two studies we hypothesized that outgroup perspective-taking promotes group-based guilt among weakly identified perpetrator group members, but hinders it among higher identifiers. In Study 1, native Dutch participants (N = 153) confronted their group's past mistreatment of outgroups, while perspective-taking was manipulated. This manipulation significantly increased guilt among lower identifiers, but decreased guilt among higher identifiers. In addition, guilt predicted positively participants' support for reparation. In Study 2 (N = 217), we replicated this interaction and elaborated on its underlying processes. As predicted, perspective-taking positively predicted feelings of compassion for outgroup members, as well as the perceived responsibility of the ingroup for the harm inflicted. Path analyses indicated the dual role of compassion: it predicted guilt positively among lower identifiers, but negatively among higher identifiers. The double-edged potential of perspective-taking for improving relations between groups that have a history on conflict is discussed.
Barkan, E. (2000). The guilt of nations: Restitution and negotiating historical injustices. New York: W. W. Norton.
2.
Batson, C.D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 282-316). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
3.
Batson, C.D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1656-1666.
4.
Batson, C.D., Polycarpou, M.P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H.J., Mitchener, E.C., Bednar, L.L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105-118.
Berndsen, M., van der Pligt, J., Doosje, B., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2004 ). Guilt and regret: The determining role of interpersonal and intrapersonal harm. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 55-70.
8.
Branscombe, N.R., Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt . In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49-66). New York and Hove: Psychology Press.
9.
Branscombe, N.R., Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D.M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
11.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 325-338.
12.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
13.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (1999). Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford: Blackwell.
14.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186.
15.
Frijda, N.H., Kuipers, P., & Ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.
16.
Galinsky, A.D., & Moskowitz, G.B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility and ingroup favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724.
17.
Giner-Sorolla, R., Castano, E., Espinosa, P., & Brown, R.J. (2008). Shame expressions reduce the recipient's insult from outgroup reparations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 519-526.
18.
Gordijn, E.H., Yzerbyt, V., Wigboldus, D., & Dumont, M. (2006). Emotional reactions to harmful intergroup behavior . European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 15-30.
19.
Hoffman, M.L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Iyer, A., Leach, C.W., & Crosby, F.J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
21.
Iyer, A., Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2007). Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: The role of anger, shame, and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 572-587.
22.
Leach, C.W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232-1245.
23.
Leach, C.W., Snider, N., & Iyer, A. (2002). `Poisoning the consciences of the fortunate': The experience of relative advantage and support for social equality. In I. Walker & H. J. Smith (Eds.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration (pp. 136-163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Leach, C.W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M., Pennekamp, S.F., Doosje, B., et al. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multi-component) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
25.
Leith, K.P., & Baumeister, R.F. (1998). Empathy, shame, guilt, and narratives of interpersonal conflicts: Guilt-prone people are better at perspective taking. Journal of Personality, 66, 1-37.
26.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M., & Ames, D.R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8, 145-157.
27.
Mackie, D.M., Silver, L.A., & Smith, E.R. (2004). Intergroup emotions. Emotion as an intergroup phenomenon. In L. Z. Tiedens & C. W. Leach (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 227-245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Mallett, R.K., Huntsinger, J.R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J.K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11(4): 451-470.
29.
McGarty, C., Pedersen, A., Leach, C.W., Mansell, T., Waller, J., & Bliuc, A. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659-680.
30.
Miron, A.M., Branscombe, N.R., & Schmitt, M.T. (2006). Collective guilt as distress over illegitimate intergroup equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 9, 163-180.
31.
Montada, L., & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged . Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344.
32.
Moore, B. (1998). Slachtoffers en overlevenden: De nazi-vervolging van de joden in Nederland 1940-1945 [Victims and survivors: The Nazi persecution of the Jews in the Netherlands 1940-1945]. Amsterdam: Bakker.
33.
Nadler, A. (2002). Inter-group helping relations as power relations: Helping relations as affirming or challenging inter-group hierarchy. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 487-502.
34.
Pedersen, A., Beven, J., Walker, I., & Griffiths, B. (2004). Attitudes toward Indigenous Australians: The role of empathy and guilt. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14, 233-249.
35.
Roccas, S., Klar, Y., & Liviatan, I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the ingroup's moral violations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
36.
Roseman, I., Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 67, 206-211.
37.
Smith, E.R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice . In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
Swim, J.K., & Miller, D.L. (1999). White quilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500-514.
39.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 61-76). London : Academic Press.
40.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
41.
Tangney, J.P., & Dearing, R.L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York: Guilford.
42.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Van der Elsken, E. (1988). Amsterdam! Oude foto's- 1947-1970 [Amsterdam! Old photographs- 1947-1970]. Meppel: Ten Brink.
44.
Vescio, T.K., Sechrist, G.B., & Paolucci, M.P. (2003). Perspective taking and prejudice reduction: The mediational role of empathy arousal and situational attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 455-472.
45.
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., & Gordijn, E. (2003). I feel for us: The impact of categorization and identification on emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 533-549.
46.
Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2004). It depends on your point of view: Implications of perspective-taking and national identification for Dutch collective guilt . In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 148-168). New York: Cambridge University Press.
47.
Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2008). The threat of those who understand: Ways in which outgroups induce guilt. European Journal of Social Psychology . DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.492.
48.
Zebel, S., Pennekamp, S.F., Van Zomeren, M., Doosje, B., Van Kleef, G.A., Vliek, M.W., et al. (2007). Vessels with gold or guilt: Emotional reactions to family involvement associated with glorious or gloomy aspects of the colonial past. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 71-86.
