We manipulated personalization and group performance feedback to examine their effects on intergroup attributions and prejudice. Following high or low levels of personalized contact with a typical out-group member, participants learned either that the out-group had generally succeeded or that the in-group had failed at the participant’s task. Under high personalization and out-group success, participants exhibited less attributional bias in explaining the success of new out-group job applicants and less prejudice toward them than those under low personalization. By contrast, when one’s in-group had failed, we found similar favorability toward in-group and out-group job applicants. Importantly, when ability attributions and friendliness were separately combined with subjective personalization, both combinations mediated the effects of manipulated personalization in reducing prejudice toward new out-group persons.
Altman, I. , & Haythorn, W. W. (1965). Interpersonal exchange in isolation . Sociometry, 28, 411-426 .
2.
Batson, C. D. , Sager, K. , Garst, E. , Kang, M. , Rubchinsky, K. , & Dawson, K. (2001). Is empathy-induced helping due to self-other merging?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 495-509 .
3.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impression of personality . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240 .
4.
Bettencourt, B. A. , Brewer, M. B. , Croak, M. R. , & Miller, N. (1992). Cooperation and the reduction of intergroup bias: The role of reward structure and social orientation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 301-319 .
5.
Botwin, M. D. , & Buss, D. M. (1989). The structure of act report data: Is the five-factor model of personality recaptured?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 988-1001 .
6.
Branscombe, N. R. , Spears, R. , Ellemers, N. , & Doosje, B. (2002). Intragroup and intergroup evaluation effects on group behavior . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 744-753 .
7.
Brewer, M. B. , & Miller, N. (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 281-302). New York: Academic Press .
8.
Brown, R. , & Turner, J. C. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 33-65). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
9.
Cook, S. W. (1978). Interpersonal and attitudinal outcome in cooperating interracial groups . Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12, 97-113 .
10.
Cook, S. W. (1984). Cooperative interaction in multiethnic contexts. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 155-185). Orlando, FL: Academic Press .
11.
Costa, P. T. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory.
12.
Doosje, B. , Spears, R. , Ellemers, N. , & Koomen, W. (1999). Perceived group variability in intergroup relations: The distinctive role of social identity . European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 41-74 .
13.
Ellemers, N. (1993). Influence of socio-structural variables on identity enhancement strategies . European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27-57 .
14.
Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity . Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161-186 .
15.
Ellemers, N. , Van Rijswijk, W. , Roefs, M. , & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198 .
16.
Ensari, N. , & Miller, N. (1998). The ‘ultimate attribution error’: A meta-analytic integration of intergroup attributional bias. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
Ensari, N. , & Miller, N. (2002). Out-group must not be so bad after all: The effects of personalization, typicality and salience on intergroup bias . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 313-329 .
18.
Fein, S. , & Spencer, S. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31-44 .
19.
Feldman-Summers, S. , & Kiesler, S. B. (1974). Those who are number two try harder: The effect of sex on attributions of causality . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 846-855 .
20.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. New York: Random House .
21.
Fiske, S. T. , Xu, J. , Cuddy, A. , & Glick, P. (1999). (Dis)respecting versus (dis)liking: Status and interdependence predict ambivalent stereotypes of competence and warmth . Journal of Social Issues, 55, 473-491 .
22.
Fitzgerald, M. P. (1963). Self-disclosure and expressed self-esteem, social distance and areas of self-revealed . Journal of Psychology, 56, 405-412 .
23.
Galinsky, A. D. , & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708-724 .
24.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative ‘description of personality’: The big five factor structure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229 .
25.
Hewstone, M. (1989). Causal attribution: From cognitive processes to collective beliefs. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
26.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution . European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335 .
27.
Hewstone, M. (2000). Contact and categorization: Social psychological interventions to change intergroup relations. In C. Stangor (Ed.), Stereotypes and prejudice: Essential readings. Key readings in social psychology (pp. 394-418). Philadelphia: Psychology Press .
28.
Hewstone, M. , & Brown, R. J. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the ‘contact hypothesis’. In M. Hewstone & R. J. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters (pp. 1-44). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
29.
Hewstone, M. , Gale, L. , & Purkhardt, N. (1990). Intergroup attributions for success and failure: Group-serving bias and group-serving causal schemata . European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 10, 23-44 .
30.
Hewstone, M. , & Jaspars, J. M. F. (1984). Social dimensions of attribution. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (pp. 379-404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
31.
Hewstone, M. , & Lord, C. G. (1998). Changing intergroup cognitions and intergroup behavior: The role of typicality. In C. Sedikides , J. Schopler , & C. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 367-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
32.
Islam, M. R. , & Hewstone, M. (1993). Intergroup attributions and affective consequences in majority and minority groups . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 936-950 .
33.
Jackson, L. A. , Sullivan, L. A. , & Hodge, C. N. (1993). Stereotype effects on attributions, predictions, and evaluations: No two social judgments are quite alike . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 69-84 .
34.
Jetten, J. , Spears, R. , & Manstead, A. S. R. (1999). Group distinctiveness and intergroup discrimination. In N. Ellemers & R. Spears (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 107-126). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science .
35.
Johnson, D. W. , Johnson, R. T. , & Maruyama, G. (1984). Goal interdependence and interpersonal attraction in heterogeneous classrooms: A meta-analysis. In N. Miller & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation (pp. 187-212). Orlando, FL: Academic Press .
36.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press .
37.
Judd, C. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations . Evaluation Review, 5, 602-619 .
38.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution . American Psychologist, 28, 107-128 .
39.
Lalonde, R. N. , & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78-85 .
40.
Levin, S. , van Laar, C. , & Sidanius, J. (2003). The effects of ingroup and outgroup friendships on ethnic attitudes in college: A longitudinal study . Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6, 76-92 .
41.
LeVine, R. A. , & Campbell, D. T. (1972). Ethnocentrism: Theories of conflict, ethnic attitudes and group behavior. New York: Wiley .
42.
Lynn, S. J. (1978). Three theories of self-disclosure exchange . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 466-479 .
43.
McCrae, R. R. , & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications . Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215 .
44.
Miller, N. (2002). Personalization and the promise of contact theory . Journal of Social Issues, 58, 387-410 .
45.
Miller, N. , Brewer, M. B. , & Edwards, K. (1985). Cooperative interaction in desegregated settings: A laboratory analogue . Journal of Social Issues, 41, 63-79 .
46.
Miller, N. , & Davidson-Podgorny, G. (1987). Theoretical models of intergroup relations and the use of cooperative teams as an intervention for desegregated settings. In Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes and intergroup relations (Vol. 9, pp. 23-39). Newbury Park, CA.: Sage .
47.
Miller, N. , & Harrington, H. J. (1992). Social categorization and intergroup acceptance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 203-227). New York: Cambridge University Press .
48.
Mullen, B. , Brown, R. , & Smith, C. (1992). In-group bias as a function of salience, relevance and status: An integration . European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122 .
49.
Mummendey, A. , Kessler, T. , Klink, A. , & Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 229-245 .
50.
Norman, W. T. (1967). 2,800 personallity trait descriptors: Normative operating characteristics for a university population. Res. Rept. 08310-1-T, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI .
51.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461-476 .
52.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185 .
53.
Pettigrew, T. F. , & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93-114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
54.
Petty, R. E. , & Mirels, H. L. (1981). Intimacy and scarcity of self-disclosure: Effects on interpersonal attraction for males and females . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 493-503 .
55.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. New York: Cambridge University Press .
56.
Rothbart, M. , & John, O. P. (1985). Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact . Journal of Social Issues, 41, 81-104 .
57.
Russell, D. , & McAuley, E. (1986). Causal attributions, causal dimensions, and affective reactions to success and failure . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1174-1185 .
58.
Sobel, M. (1982). Asympototic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass .
59.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety . Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157-175 .
60.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. New York: Academic Press .
61.
Taylor, D. M. , & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162-171 .
62.
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error . Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236 .
63.
Town, J. P. , & Harvey, J. H. (1981). Self-disclosure, attribution, and social interaction . Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 291-300 .
64.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability . Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232 .
65.
Weiner, B. (1974). Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press .
66.
Weiner, B. , Russell, D. , & Lerman, D. (1979). The cognition-emotion process in achievement-related contexts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1211-1220 .
67.
Wilder, D. A. (1978). Perceiving persons as a group: Effects on attribution of causality and beliefs . Social Psychology, 41, 13-23 .
68.
Wilder, D. A. (1984). Predictions of belief homogeneity and similarity following social categorization . British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 323-333 .
69.
Wilder, D. A. (1986). Cognitive factors affecting the success of intergroup contact. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 49-66). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
70.
Wright, S. C. , Aron, A. , McLaughlin-Volpe, T. , & Ropp, S. A. (1997). The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 73-90 .
71.
Yarkin, K. L. , Harvey, J. H. , & Bloxom, B. M. (1981). Cognitive sets, attribution, and social interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 243-252 .
