Using Berry, Trimble, and Olmedo's (1986) theorizing as a foundation, the present article applies acculturation constructs to the domain of intergroup bias and compares them to social categorization variables. The paper comprises three school-based studies that test the predictive and mediating roles of acculturation and social categorization, respectively. Results of Studies 1 and 2 with ethnically diverse classes of ninth graders support the hypothesis that outgroup orientation, a dimension of acculturation, mediates the interracial classroom climate-intergroup bias relationship, and independently boosts the prediction of bias. Although social categorization variables do not mediate this relationship reliably, as a group they predict bias. Study 3 replicates these findings in a different context with a largely European American class of seventh grade students.
Ainsworth. A. , Wittig, M. A. , & Molina. L. E. (2003). Psychometric imtprovements in measures of social categorization: A field test with high school students Manuscript in preparation, California State University at Northridge .
2.
Ainsworth, A. , Wittig, M. A. , & Rabinowitz, J. L. (2003). A comparative test of ethnic group differences in an acculturation model of preudice reduction in two multicultural educational programs Manuscript in preparation, California State University at Northridge .
3.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudiceReading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
4.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182 .
5.
Barreto, M. , & Ellemers, N. (2002). The impact of respect versus neglect of self-identities on identification and group loyalty . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 629-639 .
6.
Berry, J. W. (1991). Understanding and managing multiculturalism: Some possible implications of research in Canada . Psychology & Developing Societies. 3, 17-49 .
7.
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation . Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5-34 .
8.
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration . Journal of Social Issues, 57615-631 .
9.
Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. M. Chun , P. B. Organista , & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 17-37). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
10.
Berry,J. W. , Trimble,J. E. , & Olmedo, E. L. (1986). Assessment of acculturation. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 291-324). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
11.
Branscombe. N. R. , Ellemers, N. , Spears, R. , & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers , R. Spears , & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, and content (pp. 35-58). Oxford: Blackwell .
12.
Brewer. M. B. , & Brown, R.J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 554-594). New York: Oxford University Press .
13.
Brewer, M. B. , & Gaertner. S. L. (2001). Toward reduction of prejudice: Intergroup contact and social categorization. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Ecds.). Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes (pp. 451-472). Oxford: Blackwell .
14.
Dovidio,J. F. , & Gaertner, S. L. (1999). Reducing prejudice: Combating intergroup biases . Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8101-105 .
15.
Dovidio,J. F. , Kawakami, K , & Gaertner, S. L. (2000). Reducing contemporary prejudice: Combating explicit and implicit bias at the individual and intergroup level. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 137-163). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
16.
Gaertner, S. L. , & Dovidio,J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity modelAnn Arbor, MI: Psychology Press .
17.
Gaertner, S. L. , Mann, J. , Murrell, A. , & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57239-249 .
18.
Gaertner, S. L. , Rust, M. C. , Dovidio, J. F. , Bachman, B. A. , & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common inglroup identity on reducing intergroup bias . Small Group Research, 25, 224-249 .
19.
Gonzalez, R. , & Brown, R. (2003). Generalization of positive attitude as a function of subgroup and superorldinate group identifications in intergroup contact . European Journal of Social Psychology. 33, 195-214 .
20.
Green, C. W. , Adams, A. M. , & Turner. C. W. (1988). Development and validation of the school interracial climate scale . American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 241-259 .
21.
Hornsey, M.J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Subgroup relations: A comparison of mutual intergroup differentiation and common ingroup identity models of prejudice reduction . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26242-256 .
22.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. A. , & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert , S. T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill .
23.
Levin, S. , Sidanius, J. , Rabinowitz, J. L. , & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideologic al asymmetry . Political Psychology, 1, 373-404 .
24.
MacKinnon, D. P. , Lockwood, C. M. , Hoffman, J. M. , West, S. G. , & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects . Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104 .
25.
Mumimendey, A. , & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference . Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174 .
26.
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups . Journal of Adolescent Research, 7156-176 .
27.
Phinney, J. S. , Horenczyk, G. , Liebkind, K , & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity, immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective . Journal of Social Issues, 57493-510 .
28.
Plaut, V. (2002). Cultural models of diversity in America: The psychology of difference and inclusion. In R. A. Schweder , M. Minow , & H. R. Marcus (Eds.), Engaging cultural differences: The multicultural challenge in liberal democracies (pp. 365-395). New York: Russell Sage .
29.
Ponterotto, J. G. , Burkard, A. , Rieger, B. P. , Grieger, I. , D'Onofrio, A. , Dubuisson, A. et al. (1995). Development and initial validation of the Quick Discrimination Index (QDI) . Eduticational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 1016-1031 .
30.
Preacher. R J. . & Leonardelli. G. J. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel Test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests Retrieved from http://www.unc.edu/preacher/sobel/sobel.htm.
31.
Rudmin, F. W. , & Ahmadzadeh, V. (2001). Psychometric critique of acculturation psychology: The case of Iranian migrants in Norway . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 42 (1), 41-56 .
32.
Ryder, A. G. , Alden, L. E. , & Paulhus, D. L. (2000) Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head to head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment . Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 7949-65 .
33.
Sidanius, J. , Feshbach, S. , Levin, S. , & Pratto, F. (1997). The interface between ethnic and national attachment: Ethnic pluralism or ethnic dominance?Public Opinion Quarterly, 61102-133 .
34.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23-45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
35.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A. , Oakes, P. J. , Reicher, S. D. , & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theoryOxford, UK: Basil Blackwell .
36.
Wittig, M. A. , & Molina. L. (2000). Moderators and mediators of prejudice reduction. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 295-318). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
