In the current investigation, we studied sex differences in belonging needs by exploring men's and women's attachment to groups. Previous work has shown that women's social needs tend to be expressed in terms of relational bonds, whereas men's also have a strong collective component (e.g. Gabriel & Gardner, 1999). In this research, we asked men and women to consider one of their important group memberships and to complete Prentice, Miller, and Lightdale's (1994) group attachment scales. In two studies, findings showed that the extent to which a woman was relationally attached (i.e. felt close to the other members of her group) was sufficient to explain the group's importance to her. In contrast, men's ratings of group importance depended upon the extent of both relational and collective attachment (i.e.attached to the group identity). Implications for real-world groups are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, F. H. (1962). A structuronomic conception of behavior: Individual and collective: I. Structural theory and the master problem of social psychology . Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 3-30 .
2.
Arrow, H. (1997). Standing out and fitting in: Culture, gender, and socialization in growing organizations. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering, 57,(11-B), 7256. (UMI: 1997-95010-107)
3.
Bakan, D. (1966). Behaviorism and American urbanization . Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5-28 .
4.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation . Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529 .
5.
Baumeister, R. F., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). What do men want? Gender differences and two spheres of belongingness: Comment on Cross and Madson (1997) . Psychological Bulletin, 122, 38-44 .
6.
Belle, D. (1989). Gender differences in children's social networks and supports. In D. Belle (Ed.), Children's social networks and social supports. Wiley series on personality processes (pp. 173-188). New York: Wiley .
7.
Benenson, J. F. (1993). Greater preference among females than males for dyadic interaction in early childhood . Child Development, 64, 544-555 .
8.
Benenson, J. F., Apostoleris, N. H., & Parnass, J. (1997). Age and sex differences in dyadic and group interaction . Developmental Psychology, 33, 538-543 .
9.
Benenson, J., Apostoleris, N., & Parnass, J. (1998). The organization of children's same-sex peer relationships. In W. M. Bukowski, William, & A. H. Cillessen, (Eds.), Sociometry then and now: Building on six decades of measuring children's experiences with the peer group. New directions for child development (pp. 5-23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
10.
Berndt, T. J., & Hoyle, S.G. (1985). Stability and change in childhood and adolescent friendships . Developmental Psychology, 21, 1007-1015 .
11.
Blumer, H. (1953). Collective behavior. In A. Lee (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp.167-222). New York: Barnes & Noble .
12.
Broderick, P. C., & Beltz, C. M. (1996). The contributions of self-monitoring and gender to preadolescents' friendship expectations . Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 35-45 .
13.
Clark, M. L., & Bittle, M. L. (1992). Friendship expectations and the evaluation of present friendships in middle childhood and early adolescence . Child Study Journal, 22, 115-135 .
14.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender . Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37 .
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 735-754 .
18.
Feshbach, N., & Sones, G. (1971). Sex differences in adolescent reactions toward newcomers . Developmental Psychology, 4, 381-386 .
19.
Feshbach, N. D. (1969). Sex differences in children's modes of aggressive responses toward outsiders . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 15, 249-258 .
20.
Fox, M., Gibbs, M., & Auerbach, D. (1985). Age and gender dimensions of friendship . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 489-501 .
21.
Gabriel, S., & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Are there `his' and `hers' types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 642-655 .
22.
Gardner, W. L., Seeley, E. A., Pennington, G. L., Solomon, J., Gabriel, S., Ernst, J.et al. The role of `his' and `her' forms of interdependence in everyday life: Gender, belonging, and social experience. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
24.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1989). Social psychology: A social identity perspective. London: Methuen .
25.
Johnson, F. L., & Aries, E. J. (1983). The talk of women friends . Women's Studies International Quarterly, 6, 353-361 .
26.
Maccoby, E. E. (1989). Gender as a social category . Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development, 127-150 .
27.
Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account . American Psychologist, 45, 513-520 .
28.
Meir, E. I., & Segal-Halevi, A. (2001). Environmental congruence, group importance, and well-being among paratroopers . Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 169-183 .
29.
Pratt, M.W., Golding, G., Hunter, W., & Sampson, R. (1988). Sex differences in adult moral orientations . Journal of Personality, 56, 373-391 .
30.
Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493 .
31.
Ross, M., & Holmberg, D. (1990). Recounting the past: Gender differences in the recall of events in the history of a close relationship. In J.M. Olson, & M.P. Zanna, (Eds.), Self-inference processes: Ontario Symposium on Personality and Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 135-152). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
32.
Scott, A. (1990). Ideology and the new social movements. London: Unwin Hyman .
33.
Singh, V., & Vinnicombe, S. (2000). Gendered meanings of commitment from high technology engineering managers in the United Kingdom and Sweden . Gender, Work and Organization, 7, 1-19 .
34.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp.7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
35.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell .
36.
Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1957). Collective behavior. New York: Prentice-Hall . Paper received 17 July 2002; revised version accepted 1 November 2002.
