Data for this longitudinal study were collected from over 2000 White, Asian, Latino, and African American college students. Results indicated that students who exhibited more ingroup bias and intergroup anxiety at the end of their first year of college had fewer outgroup friends and more ingroup friends during their second and third years of college, controlling for pre-college friendships and other background variables. In addition, beyond these effects of prior ethnic attitudes and orientations on friendship choices, those with more outgroup friendships and fewer ingroup friendships during their second and third years of college showed less ingroup bias and intergroup anxiety at the end of college, controlling for the prior attitudes, pre-college friendships, and background variables. Results are discussed in terms of the contact hypothesis.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Amir, Y. (1976). The role of intergroup contact in change of prejudice in race relations. In P. Katz (Ed.), Towards the elimination of racism (pp. 245-308). New York: Pergamon.
3.
Branscombe, N. R. , Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. (1999). Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 135-149.
4.
Crosby, F. J. , Cordova, D., & Jaskar, K. (1993). On the failure to see oneself as disadvantaged: Cognitive and emotional components. In M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
5.
Feldman, K. A. , & Newcomb, T. M. (1969). The impact of college on students. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
6.
Gaertner, S. L. , & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
7.
Hamberger, J. , & Hewstone, M. (1997). Inter-ethnic contact as a predictor of blatant and subtle prejudice: Tests of a model in four West European nations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 173-190.
8.
Herek, G. M. , & Capitanio, J. P. (1996). ‘Some of my best friends’: Intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412-424.
9.
Hurtado, S. , Milem, J. F., Clayton-Pedersen, A. R., & Allen, W. R. (1998). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. Review of Higher Education, 21, 279-302.
10.
Islam, M. R. , & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700-710.
11.
Kessler, T. , Mummendey, A., & Leisse, U. K. (2000). The personal-group discrepancy: Is there a common information basis for personal and group judgment?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 95-109.
12.
Levin, S. , & Van Laar, C. (2002, June). Causes and consequences of self-segregation in college. Paper presented at the Biannual Meeting of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, Toronto, Ontario.
13.
Newcomb, T. M. (1966). The general nature of peer group influence. In T. M. Newcomb & E. K. Wilson (Eds.), College peer groups. Chicago: Aldine-National Opinion Research Center.
14.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1996). How to think like a social scientist. New York: Harper-Collins.
15.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1997). Generalized intergroup contact effects on prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 173-185.
16.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
17.
Pettigrew, T. F. , & Tropp, L. R. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings (pp. 93-114). In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Postmes, T. , Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Young, H. (1999). Comparative processes in personal and group judgments: Resolving the discrepancy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 320-338.
19.
Powers, D. A. , & Ellison, C. G. (1995). Interracial contact and black racial attitudes: The contact hypothesis and selectivity bias. Social Forces, 74, 205-226.
20.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (1992). Reducing intercultural anxiety through intercultural contact. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 16, 89-106.
21.
Stephan, W. G. , & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice (pp. 23-45). In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Taylor, D. M. , Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Van Laar, C. , Levin, S., Sinclair, S., & Sidanius, J. (2002). The effect of college roommate contact on ethnic attitudes and behavior. Manuscript in preparation.
24.
Wilder, D. A. , & Thompson, J. E. (1980). Intergroup contact with independent manipulations of in-group and out-group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 589-603.
25.
Williams, R. M., Jr. (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions. New York: Social Science Research Council.
