Abrams, D. , Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological attachment to the group: Cross-cultural differences in organizational identification and subjective norms as predictors of workers’ turnover intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1027-1039.
2.
Abrams, D. , & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.
3.
Ashforth, B. E. , & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
4.
Brewer, M. B. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. Jackson & M. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47-68). New York: American Psychological Association.
5.
Brown, R. , Condor, S., Mathews, A., Wade, G., & Williams, J. (1986). Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 273-286.
6.
Brown, R. J. (1978). Divided we fall: An analysis of relations between sections of a factory workforce. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 395-429). London: Academic Press.
7.
Dutton, J. E. , Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
8.
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage.
9.
Haslam, S. A. , & Platow, M. J. (in press). Social identity and the link between leadership and followership: How affirming an ingroup identity translates personal vision into group action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
10.
Haslam, S. A. , Powell, C., & Turner, J. C. (2000). Social identity, self-categorization and work motivation: Rethinking the contribution of the group to positive and sustainable organizational outcomes. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 319-339.
11.
Haslam, S. A. , van Knippenberg, D., Platow, M. J., & Ellemers, N. (Eds.). (in prep.). Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
12.
Hogg, M. A. (in press). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
13.
Hogg, M. A. , Hains, S. C., & Mason, I. (1998). Identification and leadership in small groups: Salience, frame of reference, and leader stereotypicality effects on leader evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1248-1263.
14.
Hogg, M. A. , & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121-140.
15.
Hogg, M. A. , & Terry, D. J. (2001). Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
16.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
17.
Mael, F. , & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123.
18.
Mael, F. , & Ashforth, B. E. (1995). Loyal from day one: Biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among newcomers. Personnel Psychology, 48, 309-333.
19.
Moreland, R. L. , Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
20.
Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In D. A. Whetten & P. C. Godfrey (Eds.), Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
Shamir, B. , House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577-594.
22.
Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization. English manuscript of ‘La catégorisation sociale’. In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction à la Psychologie Sociale (Vol. 1, pp. 272-302). Paris: Larousse.
23.
Terry, D. J. , & Callan, V. J. (1998). In-group bias in response to an organizational merger. Group Dynamics, 2, 67-81.
24.
Tsui, A. , Egan, T., & O’Reilly, C. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
25.
Tyler, T. R. (1999). Why people cooperate with organizations: An identity-based perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 21, 201-246.
26.
Tyler, T. R. , & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups. Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
27.
van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 357-371.
28.
van Knippenberg, D. , van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., & de Lima, F. (in press). Organizational identification after a merger: A social identity perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology.
29.
van Knippenberg, D. , & van Leeuwen, E. (2001). Organizational identity after a merger: Sense of continuity as the key to post-merger identification. In M. A. Hogg & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Social identity processes in organizational contexts. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
