This questionnaire study was conducted among 202 French-speaking students one month before the 1995 referendum on sovereignty in Quebec. Principal questions concerned: intervention of human rights (HR) attitudes; value priorities; expectations about enforcement and violation of rights (individual/collective) in political choices; and sovereignty representations (for/against). It was found that HR attitudes did not intervene in political choices, but that concerns about well-being and traditional values were linked to Non-Sovereigntist attitudes, whereas social value choices accompanied Pro-Sovereigntist ones. Furthermore, respondents generally thought that, in the outcome of their choice, socioeconomic and collective rights would be better respected; whereas, when confronted with an outcome contrary to their choice, Pro-Sovereigntists expected more political and linguistic discrimination.
Ajzen, I. , & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Assemblée Nationale. . (1995). Law project on the future of Quebec. Québec: Éditeur officiel. Government Printing Office.
3.
Balthazar, L. (1995). Nationalisme et identité [Nationalism and identity]. In G. Lachapelle, P. P. Tremblay, & J. E. Trent (Eds.), L'impact référendaire (pp. 221-234). Québec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
4.
Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009-1015.
5.
Bourhis, R. Y. (1994). Ethnic and language attitudes in Quebec. In J. W. Berry & J. A. Laponce (Eds.), Ethnicity and culture in Canada. The research landscape (pp. 322-360). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6.
Brickman, Ph. , Folger, R., Goode, E., & Schul, Y. (1981). Microjustice and macrojustice. In M. J. Lerner & S. C. Lerner (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior (pp. 173-202). New York: Plenum Press.
7.
Clémence, A. , & Doise, W. (1995). La représentation sociale de la justice: Une approche des droits dans la pensée ordinaire [Social representation of justice: An approach to rights in ordinary thinking]. L'Année Sociologique, 45, 371-400.
8.
Clémence, A. , Doise, W., De Rosa, A. S., & Gonzalez, L. (1995). La représentation sociale des droits de l'homme: Une recherche internationale sur l'étendue et les limites de l'universalité [Social representation of human rights: An international study about the extent and limits of universality]. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 181-212.
9.
Cochrane, R. , Billig, M., & Hogg, M. (1979). Politics and values in Britain: A test of the Rokeach two-value model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 249-258.
10.
Commission des Droits de la Personne. . (1993). La charte des droits et libertés de la personne. [The Québec charter of human rights and freedoms]. Québec: Éditeur officiel. Government Printing Office.
11.
Crawford, J. (1988). The rights of peoples: `Peoples' or `governments'? In J. Crawford (Ed.), The rights of peoples (pp. 55-68). New York: Oxford University Press.
12.
Doise, W. (1993). Debating social representations. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations (pp. 157-170). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13.
Doise, W. (1998). Social psychology and human rights. European Review, 6, 341-347.
14.
Doise, W. , Clémence, A., & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
15.
Doise, W. , & Herrera, M. (1994). Déclaration universelle et représentations sociales des droits de l'homme: Une étude à Genève [Universal declaration and social representation of human rights: A study at Geneva]. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 7, 87-107.
16.
Doise, W. , Spini, D., & Clémence, A. (1999). Human rights studied as social representations in a cross-national context. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1-29.
17.
Doise, W. , Spini, D., Jesuino, J. C., Ng, S. H., & Emler, N. (1994). Values and perceived conflicts in the social representations of human rights: Feasibility of a cross-national study. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 53, 240-251.
18.
Doise, W. , Staerklé, C., Clémence, A., & Savory, F. (1998). Human rights and Genevan youth: A developmental study of social representations. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57, 86-100.
19.
Guimond, S. , & Tougas, F. (1994). Sentiments d'injustice et actions collectives: La privation relative. In R. Y. Bourhis & J. P. Leyens (Eds.), Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations intergroupes (pp. 201-231). Bruxelles: Mardaga.
20.
Helkama, K. , Uutela, A., & Schwartz, S. (1992). Value systems and political cognition. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Social psychology of political and economic cognition (pp. 7-31). London: Surrey University Press.
21.
Herrera, M. , Doise, W., & Lavallée, M. (1998). Social representation of humans rights and Aboriginal rights. Manuscript in preparation. University of Geneva and Laval University at Quebec.
22.
Herrera, M. , & Lavallée, M. (1996). Les représentations sociales des droits de l'homme et les valeurs chez des étudiants francophones à Québec [Social representations of human rights and values among French-speaking students at Quebec]. Service Social, 2, 101-128.
23.
Himmelweit, H. T. , Humphreys, P., Jaeger, M., & Katz, M. (1981). How voters decide. A longitudinal study of political attitudes and voting extending over fifteen years (European Monographs in Social Psychology, 27). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Kallen, E. (1995). Ethnicity and human rights in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
25.
Lachapelle, G. (1995). Légitimité et légalitée [Legitimate and legality]. In G. Lachapelle, P.P. Tremblay, & J.E. Trent (Eds.), L'impact référendaire. Québec (pp. 203-220). Québec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
26.
Nations Unies. (1994). La charte internationale des Droits de l'Homme: Déclaration Universelle des Droits de l'Homme. Adoptée et proclamée par l'Assemblée Générale, Résolution 217 A (III) du 10 Décembre 1948 [The international bill of Human Rights: Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948]. In Centre pour les droits de l'homme Genève (Eds.), Recueil d'instruments internationaux: Vol. I. Instruments universels (pp. 1-7). New York and Genève: Nations Unies.
27.
Ng, S. H. , Akhtar Hossain, A. B. M., Ball, P., Bond, M. H., Hayashi K., Lim, S. P., O'Driscoll, M. P., Sinha, D., & Yang K. S. (1982). Human values in nine countries. In R. Rath, H. S. Asthana, D. Sinha, & J. B. H. Sinha (Eds.), Diversity and unity in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 196-205). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
28.
Prager, J. (1998). 'Seek ye first the economic kingdom!' In search of a rational choice interpretation of Quebec nationalism. In J. Couture, K. Nielsen, & M. Seymour (Eds.), Rethinking nationalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Vol. 22 (pp. 551-578). Alberta: University of Calgary Press.
29.
Rocher, F. , & Rocher, G. (1991). La culture québécoise en devenir: Les défis du pluralisme [The becoming Quebec culture: The challenge of pluralism]. In F. Ouellet & M. Pagé (Eds.), Pluriethnicité, education et société. Construire un espace commun (pp. 43-76). Québec: Institut Québécois de Recherche sur la Culture.
30.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
31.
Spini, D. , & Doise, W. (1998). Organising principles of involvement in human rights and their social anchoring in value priorities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 603-622.
32.
Staerklé, C. , Clémence, A., & Doise, W. (1998). Representation of human rights across different national contexts: The role of democratic and non-democratic populations and governments. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 207-226.
33.
Trent, J. E. (1995). Les enjeux de la décision référendaire [The referendum decision stake]. In G. Lachapelle, P. P. Tremblay, & J. E. Trent (Eds.), L'impact référendaire (pp. 161-202). Québec: Presses de l'Université du Québec.
34.
Vasak, K. (1990). Les différentes catégories des droits de l'homme [The different categories of human rights]. In A. Lapeyre, F. de Tinguy, & K. Vasak (Eds.), Les dimensions universelles des droits de l'homme (Vol. 1, pp. 297-309). Bruxelles: UNESCO.
