Abrams, D. , & Hogg, M. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 7-20.
2.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Brauner, E. (1998). Die Qual der Wahl am Methodenbuffet oder: Wie der Gegenstand nach der passenden Methode sucht [The strenuous choice at the buffet of methods or: How a topic is searching for the right method]. In E. Ardelt- Gattinger, H. Lechner, & W. Schlögl (Eds.), Gruppendynamik. Anspruch und Wirklichkeit der Arbeit in Gruppen (pp. 176-193). Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.
4.
Bruner, J. S. , & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42, 33-44.
5.
Davis, J. H. (1996). Small group research and the Steiner question: The once and future thing. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 4-16). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Driver, M. J. , & Streufert S. (1969). Integrative complexity: An approach to individuals and groups as information-processing systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 272-285.
7.
Fisch, R. , & Daniel, H.-D. (1982). Research and publication trends in experimental social psychology: 1971-1980 - A thematic analysis of the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, the European Journal of Social Psychology, and the Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 395-412.
8.
Fiske, S. T. (1995). Social cognition. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 149-193). New York: McGraw Hill.
9.
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
10.
Galegher, J. , Kraut, R. E., & Egidio, C. (1990). Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11.
Graumann, C. F. (1955). ‘Social perception’. Die Motivation der Wahrnehmung in neueren amerikanischen Untersuchungen [‘Social perception’. The motivation of perception in new American studies]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 3, 605-661.
12.
Hinsz, V. B. , Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997). The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 43-64.
13.
Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed., enlarged version). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Larson, J. R. , & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
15.
Levine, J. M. , & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
16.
Levine, J. M. , & Moreland, R. L. (1995). Group processes. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 419-465). New York: McGraw-Hill.
17.
Levine, J. M. , Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
18.
McGrath, J. E. (1997). Small group research, that once and future field: An interpretation of the past with an eye to the future. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 7-27.
19.
Miller, J. G. (1960). Information input overload and psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, 116, 695-704.
20.
Miller, J. G. (1971). Living systems: The group. Behavioral Science, 16, 302-398.
21.
Moreland, R. L. (1996). Lewin’s legacy for small- groups research. Systems Practice, 9, 7-26.
22.
Moreland, R. L. , Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1994). Back to the future: Social psychological research on groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 527-555.
23.
Nye, J. L. , & Brower, A. M. (Eds.), (1996). What’s social about social cognition: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Paulus, P. B. (1989). An overview and evaluation of group influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-12). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Sanna, L. J. , & Parks, C. D. (1997). Group research trends in social and organizational psychology: Whatever happened to intragroup research?Psychological Science, 8, 261-267.
26.
Simpson, J. A. , & Wood, W. (1992). Introduction: Where is the group in social psychology? An historical overview. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp.1-10). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
27.
Steiner, I. D. (1974). Whatever happened to the group in social psychology?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 1467-1478.
28.
Steiner, I. D. (1983). Whatever happened to the touted revival of the group? In H. Blumberg, A. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 539-548). New York: Wiley.
29.
Steiner, I. D. (1986). Paradigms and groups. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 251-289). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
30.
Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgement of magnitude. Psychological Review, 64, 192-204.
31.
Tindale, R. S. , & Anderson, E. M. (1998). Small group research and applied social psychology: An introduction. In R. S. Tindale, F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myer (Eds.), Social psychological applications to social issues: Theory and research on small groups (Vol. 4, pp. 1-8). New York: Plenum Press.
32.
Von Cranach, M. , Ochsenbein, G., & Valach, L. (1986). The group as a self-active system: Outline of a theory of group action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 193-229.
33.
Wegner, D. M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.