Recent years have seen the increasing visibility of Thai transgender women in social media. Some kathoey, a Thai colloquial term for transgender women, have ventured into social media platforms by carving out their own career paths as influencers. Given that kathoey remain ostracized economically in Thai society, this study aims to analyse the emerging mode of labour which largely depends on platforms. Drawing on interviews of 11 prominent kathoey influencers, this study conceptualizes their cultural production as platform-dependent creative labour. Through this mode of labour, the livelihood of a kathoey becomes intertwined with the platforms’ economic logics and governing policies. This study contends that this mode of labour is underpinned by a contradictory form of self-governance where empowerment and disempowerment play out concurrently. While this mode of labour enables a select few kathoey to contest existing socio-economic constraints, it also further prolongs social and economic exclusion in Thai society.
AbidinC (2016) Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia161(1): 86–100.
2.
AlacovskaA (2018) Hope labour revisited: Post-socialist creative workers and their methods of hope. In: TaylorSLuckmanS (eds) The New Normal of Working Lives. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 41–64.
3.
AlacovskaAGillR (2019) De-westernizing creative labour studies: The informality of creative work from an ex-centric perspective. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(2): 195–212.
4.
BaudinetteT (2019) Lovesick, The Series: Adapting Japanese ‘Boys Love’ to Thailand and the creation of a new genre of queer media. South East Asia Research27(2): 115–132.
5.
ChenJN (2019) Trans Exploits: Trans of Color Cultures and Technologies in Movement. Durham: Duke University Press.
6.
ConorBGillRTaylorS (2015) Gender and creative labour. The Sociological Review63(1): 1–22..
7.
CouldryN (2019) Media: Why It Matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8.
CurrahP (2022). Sex Is as Sex Does: Governing Transgender Identity. New York, NY: New York University Press.
9.
CurrahPJuangRMMinterS (2006) Introduction. In: CurrahPRJuangRMMinterS (eds) Transgender Rights. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, xiii–xxiv.
10.
DavisMXiaoJ (2021) De-westernizing platform studies: History and logics of Chinese and U.S. platforms. International Journal of Communication15(20): 103–122.
11.
DeuzeMPrengerM (2019) Making media: Production, practices, and professions. In: DeuzeMPrengerM (eds) Making Media: Production, Practices, and Professions. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 13–28.
12.
DrentenJGurrieriLTylerM (2020) Sexualized labour in digital culture: Instagram influencers, porn chic and the monetization of attention. Gender, Work & Organization27: 41–66.
13.
DuffyBE (2015) Gendering the labor of social media production. Feminist Media Studies15(4): 710–714.
14.
DuffyBE (2016) The romance of work: Gender and aspirational labour in the digital culture industries. International Journal of Cultural Studies19(4): 441–457.
15.
DuffyBE (2018) (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven: Yale University Press.
16.
DuffyBE (2019) 28. #Dreamjob: The promises and perils of a creative career in social media. In: DeuzeMPrengerM (eds) Making Media: Production, Practices, and Professions. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 375–386.
17.
DuffyBEPruchniewskaU (2017) Gender and self-enterprise in the social media age: A digital double bind, information. Communication & Society20(6): 843–859.
18.
FongkaewKKhruataengAUnsathitS, et al. (2019) “Gay guys are shit-lovers” and “lesbians are obsessed with fingers”: The (mis)pepresentation of LGBTIQ people in Thai news media. Journal of Homosexuality66(2): 260–273.
19.
FontanaESiriwichaiP (2022) Understanding transgender persons’ careers to advance sustainable development: The case of Trans for Career Thailand. Sustainable Development30(6): 1–18.
20.
FuchsC (2007) Transnational space and the ‘network society’. Twenty-First Century Society2(1): 49–78.
21.
FuchsC (2014) Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society23(1): 97–123.
22.
GandiniA (2021) Digital labour: An empty signifier?Media, Culture & Society43(2): 369–380.
23.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
24.
GrahamMHjorthILehdonvirtaV (2017) Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research23(2): 135–162.
25.
GreggMAndrijasevicR (2019) Virtually absent: the gendered histories and economies of digital labour. Feminist Review123(1): 1–7.
26.
HoltJPerrenA (2019) Media industries: A decade in review. In: DeuzeMPrengerM (eds) Making Media: Production, Practices, and Professions. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 31–44.
27.
HomantESenderK (2019) Queer immaterial labor in beauty videos by LGBTQ-identified YouTubers. International Journal of Communication13(19): 5386–5404.
28.
HuwsU (2013) Working online, living offline: Labour in the Internet Age. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation7(1): 1–11.
29.
IqaniM (2019) Picturing luxury, producing value: The cultural labour of social media brand influencers in South Africa. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(2): 229–247.
30.
JacksonPA (2002) Offending images: Gender and sexual minorities, and state control of the media in Thailand. In: RussellHH (ed.) Media Fortunes, Changing Times: ASEAN States in Transition. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 201–230.
31.
KängDB (2012) Kathoey “In Trend”: Emergent genderscapes, national anxieties and the re-signification of male-bodied effeminacy in Thailand. Asian Studies Review36(4): 475–494.
32.
LehnerA (2021) Critical questions and embodied reflections: Trans visual culture today—A roundtable. Art Journal80(4): 38–52.
33.
LeungWFCossuA (2019) Digital entrepreneurship in Taiwan and Thailand: Embracing precarity as a personal response to political and economic change. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(2): 264–280.
34.
LimkangvanmongkolVAbidinC (2019) Net idols and beauty bloggers’ negotiations of race, commerce, and cultural customs: Emergent microcelebrity genres in Thailand. In: AbidinCBrownML (eds) Microcelebrity Around the Globe: Approaches to Cultures of Internet Fame. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing, 95–106.
35.
LovelockM (2017) ‘Is every YouTuber going to make a coming out video eventually?’: YouTube celebrity video bloggers and lesbian and gay identity. Celebrity Studies8(1): 87–103.
36.
LovelockM (2019) ‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal of Cultural Studies22(1): 70–85.
37.
LyB (2020) Traces of Trauma: Cambodian Visual Culture and National Identity in the Aftermath of Genocide. Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press.
38.
MackenzieEMcKinlayA (2020) Hope labour and the psychic life of cultural work. Human Relations74(11): 1841–1863.
39.
MastrangeloF (2020) Mediating resistance: Digital immaterial labor, neoliberal subjectivities, and the struggle for immigrant justice. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization20(4): 323–338.
40.
McCarthyBD (2023) Introduction. In: StrykerSMcCarthy BlackstonD (eds) The Transgender Studies Reader Remix. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 1–12.
41.
McGuiganJ (2010) Creative labour, cultural work and individualisation. International Journal of Cultural Policy16(3): 323–335.
42.
McRobbieA (2010) Reflections on feminism and immaterial labour. New Formations70: 60–76.
43.
McRobbieA (2016) Be Creative: Making a Living in the New Culture Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
44.
NewmanPAReidLTepjanS, et al. (2021) LGBT+ inclusion and human rights in Thailand: A scoping review of the literature. BMC Public Health21(1816): 1–21.
45.
NinpanitS (2020) Critical Discourse Analysis of English news headlines on Thai transgender individuals from Thai and international websites. The New English Teacher14(2): 42–63.
46.
OchaW (2020) Gold rush abroad: The trajectory of Singapore-based Thai transsexual (male to female) sex workers in global sex tourism. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies13(1): 123–141.
47.
PhuvatisW (2019) Effects of language usage in news reports of sexuality in Thai media: Gender identity conflict. Kasem Bundit Journal20: 72–87.
48.
PoellTNieborgDDuffyBE (2022) Platforms and Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
49.
ScholzT (2013) Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. New York: Routledge.
50.
SinghakowintaJ (2016) Reinventing sexual identities: Thai gay men’s pursuit of social acceptance. NIDA Journal of Language and Communication21(27): 14–40.
51.
SinnottM (2000) The semiotics of transgendered sexual identity in the Thai print media: Imagery and discourse of the sexual other. Culture, Health & Sexuality2(4): 425–440.
52.
SrikummoonPOonaromAManojaiN, et al. (2023) Experiences of being bullied and the quality of life of transgender women in Chiang Mai province, Thailand. Transgender Health8(2): 175–187.
53.
StathamPScuzzarelloS (2023) Transgender Kathoey and gay men using tourist-zone scenes as ‘social opportunities’ for nonheteronormative living in Thailand. Gender, Place & Culture30(2): 183–210.
54.
SteinbockE (2023) Shimmering images: Trans cinema, embodiment, and the aesthetics of change. In: StrykerSMcCarthyBD (eds) The Transgender Studies Reader Remix. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 539–552.
55.
StrykerS (2008) Transgender History. Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
56.
StrykerS (2023) Forward. In: StrykerSMcCarthyBD (eds) The Transgender Studies Reader Remix. 1st ed. New York, NY: Routledge, x–xi.
57.
SuriyasarnB (2016) Discrimination and marginalization of LGBT workers in Thailand. In: KöllenT (ed.) Sexual Orientation and Transgender Issues in Organizations. Switzerland: Springer, 197–216.
58.
ThornbergRCharmazK (2014) Grounded theory and theoretical coding. In: FlickU (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 153–169.
59.
TourmalineStanleyEABurtonJ (2017). Trap Door: Trans Cultural Production and the Politics of Visibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
60.
UNDP (2019) Tolerance But Not Inclusion: A National Survey on Experiences of Discrimination and Social Attitudes Towards LGBT People in Thailand. Bangkok: UNDP.
61.
WarkM (2023) Raving. New York, NY: Duke University Press.
62.
WinterS (2011) Transpeople (khon kham-phet) in Thailand: transprejudice, exclusion, and the presumption of mental illness. In: PA Jackson (ed) Queer Bangkok: 21st Century Markets, Media, and Rights. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 251–267.
63.
WinterSDavis-McCabeCRussellC, et al. (2018) Denied Work - An Audit of Employment Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity in South-East Asia. Bangkok: Asia Pacific Transgender Network and United Nations Development Programme.
64.
KankateLOraphanP (2022) Communication strategy of male-to-female transgender YouTubers. Journal of Communication Arts Review26(1): 19–32.
65.
PreechapanyakulW (2020) Language and identity of third sex masters of ceremony as represented in television programs. Journal of Management Science Chiangrai Rajabhat University15(2): 143–163.
66.
SangsodaE (2022) Phra Maha Devi Chao of the Thip City: A study of intertextuality characteristics in multi-platform context. Journal of Journalism15(2): 319–363.
67.
TanadkhaJAkarapongpisakN (2021) Becoming net-idols: How the LGBTQ counters marginalization. Journal of Social Science for Local Rajabhat Mahasarakham University5(3): 213–221.
68.
TechaPBunyasaranaiP (2020) Language and ideology in the “sexually confused” consultation discourse in a virtual community. Journal of Human Sciences21(3): 85–105.
