Following growing bodies of scholarship concerned with the social and cultural lives of economic forms, this article tries to recover some of the complexity of contracts in creative work. While contracts might seem to reflect narrowly economic determinations, as mere instruments of commerce, sociological models emphasize their contingency and artifice. Moving toward and forward from such models, this article synthesizes a more sociocultural model, approaching contract as a scene of contestation, communication and constitution. It develops these themes in a series of engagements with predominant legal, economic and sociological models of contract; across these engagements, it draws upon and draws together cases of recording artists and film stars, while also drawing broader comparisons with other creative workers.
AppaduraiA (ed) (1988) The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AtiyahP (1985) The Rise and Fall of Freedom of Contract. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BalioT (1996) Grand Design: Hollywood as a Modern Business Enterprise, 1930–1939. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
BarnettJ (2015) Hollywood deals: soft contracts for hard markets. Duke Law Journal64(4): 605–669.
8.
BourdieuP (1993) The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
BuckleyF (2005) Just Exchange: A Theory of Contract. New York: Routledge.
10.
CampbellDHarrisD (1993) Flexibility in long-term contractual relationships: the role of co-operation. Journal of Law and Society20(2): 166–191.
11.
CarmanE (2008) Independent Stardom: Female Stars and Freelance Labor in 1930s Hollywood. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of California Los Angeles. doi: 10.1177/1367877915617002
12.
CavesR (2000) Creative Industries: Contracts between Art and Commerce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
ChristophersonC (2002) Project work in context: regulatory change and the new geography of media. Environment and Planning A34(11): 2003–2015.
14.
ClarkD (1995) Negotiating Hollywood: The Cultural Politics of Actors’ Labor. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
CoaseR (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica4(16): 386–405.
16.
CorriganT (1990) The commerce of auteurism: a voice without authority. New German Critique49: 43–57.
17.
DiMaggioPPowellW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48(2): 147–160.
DonzelotJ (1991) The mobilization of society. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: Chicago, pp. 169–179.
21.
DuGayPPrykeM (eds) (2002) Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. London: Sage.
22.
FaulknerRAndersonA (1987) Short-term projects and emergent careers: evidence from Hollywood. American Journal of Sociology92(4): 879–909.
23.
FeinmanJ (1989) The significance of contract theory. University of Cincinnati Law Review58(4): 1283–1318.
24.
FligsteinN (1990) The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
GabelPFeinmanJ (1998) Contract law as ideology. In: KairysD (ed.) The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique, 3rd edn.New York: Basic Books, pp. 497–510.
26.
GainesJ (1991) Contested Culture: The Image, the Voice, and the Law. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
27.
GérardZ (2014–15) Legal status of reality TV show participants in the United States and in France: a comparative study. Entertainment and Sports Lawyer31(3): 3–9.
28.
GreenfieldSOsbornG (1994) Sympathy for the devil? Contractual constraint and artistic autonomy in the entertainment industry. Media Law & Practice15(4): 117–127.
29.
GreenfieldSOsbornG (1998) Contract and Control in the Entertainment Industry: Dancing on the Edge of Heaven. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
30.
GreenfieldSOsbornG (2007) Understanding commercial music contracts: the place of contractual theory. Journal of Contract Law23(1): 1–21.
31.
HandelJ (2011) Hollywood on Strike! An Industry at War in the Internet Age. Los Angeles: Hollywood Analytics.
32.
HavensTLotzATinicS (2009) Critical media industry studies: a research approach. Communication, Culture & Critique2(2): 234–253.
33.
HeumanJ (2012) ‘Let’s light this candle’? Early online investment and the regulation of freedom in ‘new’ work forms. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies9(2): 146–170.
34.
HodgsonDBriandL (2013) Controlling the uncontrollable: ‘agile’ teams and illusions of autonomy in creative work. Work, Employment, and Society27(2): 308–325.
35.
HoltJ (2011) Empires of Entertainment: Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980–1996. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
36.
HorkheimerMAdornoT (1972) The Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
37.
HoytE (2011) Writer in the hole: Desny v Wilder, copyright law, and the battle over ideas. Cinema Journal50(1): 21–40.
38.
JacobidesMBillingerS (2006) Designing the boundaries of the firm: from ‘make, buy, or ally’ to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organization Science17(2): 249–261.
39.
JonesC (1996) Careers in project networks: the case of the film industry. In: ArthurMRousseauD (eds) The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 58–75.
40.
KennedyD (1979) The structure of Blackstone’sCommentaries. Buffalo Law Review28(2): 205–382.
41.
KennedyH (2013) Against amateur economies: spec work competitions and the anti-spec movement. Cultural Studies Review19(1): 228–248.
42.
KraszewskiJ (2008) Authorship and adaptation: the public personas of television anthology writers. Quarterly Review of Film and Video25(4): 271–285.
43.
KraszewskiJ (2010) The New Entrepreneurs: An Institutional History of Television Anthology Writers. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
44.
LatourB (1994) On technical mediation. Common Knowledge3(1): 29–64.
45.
LittletonC (2012) TV on Strike: Why Hollywood Went to War over the Internet. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
46.
LotzA (2013) The process of theory-building in media industry studies. Paper presented at Society for Cinema and Media Studies conference, Chicago, IL, 6–10 March.
47.
MacaulayS (1963) Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. American Sociological Review28(1): 1–19.
48.
MacNeilI (1974) The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review47(3): 691–816.
49.
MacNeilI (1978) Contracts: adjustments of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review72(6): 854–905.
50.
ManningSSydowJ (2007) Transforming creative potential in project networks: how TV movies are produced under network-based control. Critical Sociology33(1): 19–42.
51.
MayerV (2011) Below the Line: Producers and Production Studies in the New Television Economy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
52.
NightingalePBaden-FullerCHopkinsM (2011) Projects, project capabilities and project organizations. Advances in Strategic Management28: 215–234.
53.
NixonS (2002) Re-imagining the ad agency: the cultural connotations of economic forms. In: DuGayPPrykeM (eds) Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. London: Sage, pp. 132–148.
54.
PaulAKleingartnerC (1994) Flexible production and the transformation of industrial relations in the motion picture and television industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review47(4): 663–678.
55.
PhelanSLewinP (1999) Paradox in project-based enterprise: what paradox?California Management Review40(2): 180–194.
56.
PowellW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior12: 295–336.
57.
PowellWDiMaggioP (eds) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: Chicago.
SiegerPZellwegerTAquinoK (2013) Turning agents into psychological principals: aligning the interests of non-owners through psychological ownership. Journal of Management Studies50(3): 361–388.
60.
SmelserNSwedbergR (eds) (2005) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
SmithGKingB (2009) Contracts as organizations. Arizona Law Review51(1): 1–45.
62.
StahlM (2005) Nonproprietary authorship and the uses of autonomy: artistic labor in American film animation. Labor2(4): 87–105.
63.
StahlM (2009) Privilege and distinction in production worlds: copyright, collective bargaining, and working conditions in media making. In: MayerVCaldwellJBanksM (eds) Production Studies: Cultural Studies of Media Industries. New York: Routledge, pp. 54–67.
64.
StahlM (2010) Primitive accumulation, the social common, and the contractual lockdown of recording artists at the threshold of digitalization. Ephemera10(3–4): 337–355.
StahlM (2013) Unfree Masters: Recording Artists and the Politics of Work. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
67.
StahlMMeierL (2012) The firm foundation of organizational flexibility: the 360-contract in the digitalizing music industry. Canadian Journal of Communication37(3): 445–446.
68.
StarkeyKBarnattCTempestS (2000) Beyond networks and hierarchies: latent organizations in the UK television industry. Organization Science11(3): 299–305.
69.
StinchcombeA (1959) Bureaucratic and craft administration of production: a comparative study. Administrative Science Quarterly4(2): 168–187.
70.
StorperMChristophersonC (1986) The city as studio, the world as back lot. Environment and Planning D4(3): 305–320.
71.
StrandvadSM (2011) Materializing ideas: a socio-material perspective on the organizing of cultural production. European Journal of Cultural Studies14(3): 283–297.
72.
SuchmanM (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review20(3): 571–610.
73.
SuchmanM (2003) The contract as social artifact. Law & Society Review37(1): 91–142.
74.
SvejenovaS (2005) The path with the heart: creating the authentic career. Journal of Management Studies42(3): 947–974.
75.
TsaiP (2013) Discovering the full potential of the 360 deal: an analysis of the Korean pop industry, seven-year statute, and Talent Agencies Act of California. UCLA Entertainment Law Review20(2): 323–349.
76.
UrsellG (2000) Television production: issues of exploitation, commodification and subjectivity in UK television labour markets. Media, Culture & Society22(6): 805–825.
77.
WarnerH (1950) Legal protection of program ideas. Virginia Law Review36(3): 289–322.
78.
WasserF (2002) Veni Vidi Video: The Hollywood Empire and the VCR. Austin, TX: Texas University Press.
79.
WexmanV (1995) Film as art and filmmakers as artists. Arachne2(2): 265–278.
80.
WilliamsonO (1973) Markets and hierarchies. American Economic Review63(2): 316–335.
