This article presents a critical analysis of the Hungarian government’s ‘Asian’ political discourse. It argues that in the wake of the economic recession, Hungary became more radical in its turn towards Asia, promoting a discourse that goes beyond economic relations and touches on sentiments of national identity and belonging. Via a discourse-historical analysis of three interrelated discursive events, the article shows how economic, cultural and racial discourses are reinforcing one another in building on the myth of cultural and racial affinity with Inner Asia and the Far East. This process is similar to the Eurasianist discourse in Russia and other ex-Soviet republics, and may have serious social and geopolitical repercussions.
BeisteguiM (1998) Heidegger and the Political: Dystopias. New York: Routledge.
2.
BeöthyZ (2010 [1896]) The small mirror of Hungarian literature (excerpt). In: ErsoyAGórnyMKechriotisV (eds) Modernism: Representations of National Culture. Budapest: Central European University Press, pp. 26–32.
3.
BíróAZZalánAVölgyiAPamjavH (2009) A Y-chromosomal comparison of the Madjars (Kazakhstan) and the Magyars (Hungary). American Journal of Physical Anthropology139(3): 305–310.
4.
van DijkTA (2003) The discourse–knowledge interface. In: WeissGWodakR (eds) Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.85–109.
5.
DoveyK (1985) Home and homelessness. In: AltmanIWernerCM (eds) Home Environments. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 33–64.
6.
FIDESZ (2009) We need balanced and amicable relations with China [Kiegyensúlyozott és baráti kapcsolatok kellenek Kínával]. 3December. Available at: http://www.fidesz.hu/index.php?Cikk=142684 (accessed 12 February 2015).
7.
FunabashiY (1993) The Asianization of Asia. Foreign Affairs72(5): 75–86.
8.
HeideggerM (1971) Poetry, Language, Thought, trans. and ed. HofstadterA. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
JägerS (2001) Discourse and knowledge: theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp. 32–62.
11.
JayasuriyaLKeePK (1999) The Asianisation of Australia? Some Facts about the Myths. Carlton South: Melbourne University Press.
12.
Jobbik (2009) A finnugor rokonságelmélet egyeduralma megszüntetésének a szükségességéről. 1September. Available at: http://jobbik.hu (accessed 30 June 2014).
13.
Jobbik (2013) A Pongrátz Gergely-érdemkereszt díjazottja: Bíró András Zsolt. 25January. Available at: http://jobbik.hu (accessed 10 September 2013).
14.
KennyM (2012) Julia Gillard reveals plan to ‘Asianise’ Australia. Daily Telegraph Australia, 29October.
15.
LaruelleM (2004) Existe-t-il des précurseurs au mouvement eurasiste? L’obsession russe pour l’Asie à la fin du XIXe siècle. Revue des Études Slaves75(3–4): 437–454.
16.
LaruelleM (2008) Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
17.
MahbubaniK (2008) America’s place in the Asian century. Current History107(709): 195–200.
18.
MathewsG (2000) Global Culture/Individual Identity: Searching for Home in the Cultural Supermarket. London: Routledge.
MeleghA (2006) On the East-West Slope: Globalization, Nationalism, Racism and Discourses on Eastern Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
NémethI (2011) Új világrend felé a 21. század elején: Kína szerepe. In: InotaiAJuhászO (eds) Stratégiai kutatások 2009–2010. Vol. II, Kína és a világ. Budapest: MTA Világgazdasági Kutatóintézet és Miniszterelnöki Hivatal, pp. 9–34.
23.
OgaT (2008) Discourses on Asianisation. Saarbrucken: VDM Publishing.
OrbánV (2012) No benefits to those who are fit-to-work [Ne kapjon segélyt, aki munkaképes]26July. Available at: http://orbanviktor.hu/beszedek/ (accessed 10 September 2013).
