Despite globalization, television is still bound to the nation-state in several aspects. The international television industry meets the national in the cross-border exchange of television content. Canned programming can hereby run into cultural barriers, which TV formats presumably can overcome, due to localization. Formats are translated to local versions that presumably suit national culture and identity. In globalization debates, localization is being used as an argument against cultural homogenization. However, there is little comparative work reviewing the extent to which TV formats are culturally specific. By comparing linguistic, intertextual and cultural codes in the Dutch and the Australian version of the British reality TV format Farmer wants a Wife, we will argue that localization of TV formats might be overrated as protection of cultural diversity.
BielbyDHarringtonC (2002) Markets and meanings: the global syndication of television programming. In: CraneDKawashimaNKawasakiK (eds) Global Cultures: Media, Arts, Policy and Globalization. London: Routledge, pp. 215–232.
2.
BlumerH (1954) What is wrong with social theory?American Sociological Review18: 3–10.
3.
BowenGA (2006) Grounded theory and sensitizing concepts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(3): 12–23.
4.
Cooper-ChenA (2005) A world of ‘millionaires’: global, local, and ‘glocal’ TV Game Shows. In: Cooper-ChenA (ed) Global Entertainment Media. Content, Audiences, Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
5.
DowdTJJanssenS (2011) Globalization and diversity in cultural fields: comparative perspectives on television, music and literature. American Behavioral Scientist55(5): 519–524.
6.
FiskeJ (1987) Television Culture. London: Routledge.
7.
HillA (2007) Restyling Factual TV: Audiences and News, Documentary and Reality Genres. London: Routledge.
8.
JensenPM (2007) Television Format Adaptation in a Trans-national Perspective – An Australian and Danish Case Study. PhD Thesis, Aarhus University, Denmark.
9.
KeaneM (2004) Asia: new growth areas. In: MoranAKeaneM (eds) Television across Asia: Television Industries, Programme Formats and Globalization. London: Routledge, pp. 9–20.
10.
KeaneMMoranA (2008) Television’s new engines. Television & New Media9: 155–169.
11.
KretschmerMSinghS (2012) Strategic behaviour in the international exploitation of TV formats – a case study of the Idols format. In: ZwaanAJDe BruinJ (eds) Adapting Idols: Authenticity, Identity and Performance in a Global Television Format. Farnham: Ashgate.
12.
KuipersG (2011) Cultural globalization as the emergence of a transnational cultural field: transnational television and national media landscapes in four European countries. American Behavioral Scientist55(5): 541–557.
13.
KuipersGDe KloetJ (2009) Banal cosmopolitanism and The Lord of the Rings: the limited role of national differences in global media consumption. Poetics37(2): 99–118.
14.
La PastinaACStraubhaarJD (2003) Multiple proximities between television genres and audiences: the schisms between telenovelas’ global distribution and local consumption. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies67(3): 271–288.
15.
LarkeyE (2009) Transcultural localization strategies of global TV formats: The Office and Stromberg. In: MoranA (ed.) TV Formats Worldwide: Localizing Global Programmes. Bristol: Intellect, pp.187–201.
16.
MikosLPerrottaM (2012) Traveling style: aesthetic differences and similarities in national adaptations of Yo soy Betty, la fea. International Journal of Cultural Studies15(1): 81–97.
17.
MoranA (2009a) Global franchising, local customizing: the cultural economy of TV programme formats. Continuum23(2): 115–125.
18.
MoranA (2009b) When TV formats are translated. In: MoranA (ed.) TV Formats Worldwide: Localizing Global Programmes. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 39–54.
19.
MoranAKeaneM (2004) Television across Asia: Television Industries, Programme Formats and Globalization. London: Routledge.
20.
MorleyD (2001) Belongings: place, space and identity in a mediated world. European Journal of Cultural Studies4(4): 425–448.
21.
RoscoeJ (2004) Watching Big Brother at work: a production study of Big Brother Australia. In: MatthijsEJonesJ (eds) Big Brother International: Formats, Critics and Publics. London: Wallflower Press, pp. 181–193.
StraubhaarJD (1991) Beyond media imperialism: asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication8(1): 39–59.
24.
StraubhaarJD (2007) World Television: From Global to Local. Los Angeles: Sage.
25.
TurnerG (1994) Making It National: Nationalism and Australian Popular Culture. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin.
26.
TurnerG (2005) Cultural identity, soap narrative, and reality TV. Television & New Media6: 415–422.
27.
WaisbordS (2004) McTV: understanding the global popularity of television formats. Television & New Media5: 359–383.
28.
WaisbordSJalfinS (2009) Imagining the national: gatekeepers and the adaptation of global franchises in Argentina. In: MoranA (ed.) TV Formats Worldwide: Localizing Global Programmes. Bristol: Intellect, pp. 55–74.
