Users of mobile phones, computers and other digital media devices are increasingly confronted with what Lessig calls ‘architectural control’. This article presents results from a study which reveals that users adopt four tactics in negotiating architectural control: modifying use, modifying the technology, decreasing use and acceptance. Users consent in two ways: by internalizing control through incorporating architectural constraints into their embodied practice, and by responding to the convenience of architectural controls and the complexity of far-flung collective digital systems. Thus it is argued that modification and adaptation in everyday practices of digital media and information communication technologies (ICTs) is a type of consent rather than resistance to digital control.
BakardjievaM (2005) Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Sage.
3.
BestK (2009) Invalid command: affordances, ICTs and user control. Information, Communication & Society12(7): 1015–1040.
4.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St Brieuc Bay. In: LawJ (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge.
5.
de CerteauM (1984) The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
FeenbergA (1995) Alternative Modernity: The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
FiskeJ (1989) Understanding Popular Culture. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
10.
FoucaultM (1986) A History of Sexuality, vol. 2. Harmondsworth: Viking.
11.
FoucaultM (1988) Technologies of the self. In MartinLHGutmanHHuttonPH (eds) Technologies of the Self. London: Tavistock.
12.
GallowayAR (2004) Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
14.
HallS (1980) Encoding/decoding. In: CCCS (ed.) Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies 1972–1979. London: Hutchinson, pp. 128–138.
15.
HartsonHR (2003) Cognitive, physical, sensory and functional affordances in interaction design. Behaviour & Information Technology22(5): 315–338.
16.
IhdeD (1990) Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
17.
IhdeD (2001) Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
JohnsonS (1997) Interface Culture. New York: Perseus.
19.
KaratJKaratCUkelsonJ (2000) Affordances, motivation, and the design of user interfaces. Communications of the ACM43(8): 49–51.
20.
LatourB (1988) Mixing humans and nonhumans together: the sociology of a door-closer. Social Problems35: 298–310.
21.
LehtonenT-K (2003) The domestication of new technologies as a set of trials. Journal of Consumer Culture3(3): 363–385.
22.
LeonardiPM (2003) Problematizing ‘new media’: culturally based perceptions of cell phones, computers, and the internet among United States Latinos. Critical Studies in Media Communication20(2): 160–179.
23.
LessigL (1999) Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
24.
LessigL (2002) Dot.Commons. In: The Future of Ideas. New York: Vintage.
25.
LessigL (2004) Free Culture. New York: Penguin Press.
26.
LewisJBestK (2003) The electronic polis: media democracy and the invasion of Iraq. Reconstruction3(3): 297–319.
27.
MacKenzieDWajcmanJ (1985) The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
28.
MadellDEMuncerSJ (2007) Control over social interactions: an important reason for young people’s use of internet and mobile phones for communication?CyberPsychology & Behaviour10(1): 137–140.
29.
MartinB (2001) Technology for Nonviolent Struggle. London: War Resisters’ International.
30.
MatuteHVadilloMAVegasSBlancoF (2007) Illusion of control in internet users and college students. CyberPsychology & Behaviour10(2): 176–181.
31.
NormanD (1988) The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Doubleday.
32.
PosterM (1991) The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
RoseE (2003) User Error: Resisting Computer Culture. Toronto: Between the Lines.
34.
SmithRBakardjievaM (2001) The internet in everyday life: computer networking from the standpoint of the domestic user. New Media & Society3(1): 67–83.
35.
WangLChenYShiJ (2007) Attitudes toward computers: a new attitudinal dimension. CyberPsychology & Behaviour10(5): 700–704.
36.
WinnerL (1980) Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus109(1): 121–136.
37.
WiseJM (1997) Exploring Technology and Social Space. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
