Getting real with Survivor Africa is a means to examine not only how
‘Africa’ and the ‘United States’ are
performed, staged and constituted in the present but also how
‘Americans’ should relate to the world and themselves.
Survivor echoes in fundamental ways the equivalent popular culture form of
the 19th century - travel writing. It posits a story told with nostalgic colonial
flair with critical plots that turn on notions of a future of constant surveillance
and a form of life conducive to an empire for a post-imperial age. Survivor
moves across the globe dropping Americans into differing geographies and carefully
teaching them how to ‘be’ in relationship to themselves and the
world. For the Survivor participants Africa needs to be recuperated,
especially from AIDS, or it becomes a sign of the failure of American modernity.
Abu-Lughod, L.
(1997)
‘The Interpretation of Culture(s) after Television: Anthropology,
Ethnographic Studies, Egyptian Mass Media’
, Representations59:
109-134
.
2.
Abu-Lughod, L.
,
B. Larkin
and
F.D. Ginsburg
(2002) Media Worlds: Anthropology on New Terrain.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
3.
Appadurai, A.
(1990)
‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’
, Public Culture2:
1-24
.
4.
Askew, K.
and
R.R. Wilk
, eds (2002) The Anthropology of Media (Blackwell
Readers in Anthropology).
Oxford: Blackwell
.
5.
Bourdieu, P.
(1998) ‘The Essence of
Neoliberalism’, Le Monde Diplomatique 12. [http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieu]
6.
Brantlinger, P.
(1985)
‘Victorians and Africans: The Geneology of the Myth of the Dark Continent’
, Critical Inquiry12:
166-203
.
7.
Comaroff, J.L.
and
J. Comaroff
(1992) ‘Colonialism and
Modernity’, in
J. Comaroff
(ed.) Ethnography and the Historical Imagination, pp.
181-291.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press
.
8.
Cooper, F.
(2001)
‘What is the Concept of Globalization Good For? An African
Historian’s Perspective’
, African AffairsV100:
189-213
.
9.
Cooper, F.
and
R.M. Packard
(1997) International Development and the Social Sciences:
Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
10.
Delisle, J.B.
(2003)
‘Surviving American Cultural Imperialism: Survivor and Traditions
of Nineteenth-Century Colonial Fiction’
, The Journal of American Culture26:
42-55
.
11.
Dominguez, V.R.
(1996) ‘Disciplining
Anthropology’, in
D.P. Gaonkar
(ed.) Disciplinarity and Dissent in Cultural Studies, pp.
37-62.
London: Routledge
.
12.
Ferguson, J.
(1999) Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban
Life on the Zambian Copperbelt.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
13.
Goodman, T.
(2003)
Reality Spoof Turns Player into Patsy in Spike’s Funny and
Addictive ‘The Joe Schmo Show’
, San Francisco Chronicle.
14.
Gray, J.
(2003) Al Qaeda and What it Means to Be Modern.
New York: W.W. Norton
.
15.
Gupta, A.
and
J. Ferguson
(1997) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a
Field Science.
Berkeley: University of California Press
.
16.
Hardt, M.
and
A. Negri
(2001) Empire.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
17.
Hawkins, G.
(2001)
‘The Ethic of Television’
, International Journal of Cultural Studies4:
412-426
.
18.
Hill, A.
and
G. Palmer
(2002)
‘Editorial: Big Brother’
, Television and New Media3:
251-254
.
19.
Ignatieff, M.
(2003)
‘The Burden’
, New York Times Magazine5 January.
20.
James, C.
(2002)
‘Mixing High Brow and Low, TV Plays to the Bottom Line’
, New York Times28 July:
1
.
21.
Kaplan, A.
(1993) ‘ “ Left Alone with
America”: The Absence of Empire in the Study of American
Culture’, in
D.E. Pease
(ed.) Cultures of United States Imperialism, pp.
3-21.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
22.
Kaplan, A.
(2002) The Anarchy of Empire in the Making of U.S.
Culture.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
23.
Kaplan, A.
and
D.E. Pease
(1993) Cultures of United States Imperialism.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
24.
Kelly, J.D.
(2003)
‘U.S. Power, After 9/11 and Before It: Not an Empire, Then What?’
, Public Culture15:
347-369
.
25.
Kilborn, R.
(2003) Staging the Real: Factual TV Programming in the Age of
Big Brother.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
26.
Lave, J.
,
P. Duguid
,
N. Fernandez
and
E. Axel
(1992)
‘Coming of Age in Birmingham: Cultural Studies and Conceptions of Subjectivity’
, Annual Review of Anthropology21:
257-282
.
27.
Mahon, M.
(2000)
‘The Visible Evidence of Cultural Producers’
, Annual Review of Anthropology29:
467-492
.
28.
Mankekar, P.
(1999) Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of
Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press
.
29.
Marcus, G.E.
(1998) Ethnography Through Thick and Thin.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
30.
McClintock, A.
(1995) Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the
Colonial Contest.
New York: Routledge
.
31.
McEachern, C.
(1998)
‘A Mutual Interest? Ethnography in Anthropology and Cultural Studies’
, The Australian Journal of Anthropology9(3):
251ff
.
32.
Miller, D.
(1995) Worlds Apart: Modernity through the Prism of the
Local.
London: Routledge
.
33.
Miller, E.D.
(2000)
‘Fantasies of Reality: Surviving Reality-based Programming’
, Social Policy31:
6-15
.
34.
Ndebele, N.
(1998) ‘Game Lodges and Leisure
Colonialists’, in
I. Vladislavic
(ed.) Blank: Architecture, Apartheid and After, chp. 10.
Cape Town: David Philip Publishers
.
35.
Ohmann, R.
(1996) Making and Selling Culture.
Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press
.
36.
Pratt, M.L.
(1992) Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and
Transculturation.
London and New York: Routledge
.
37.
Riley, K.C.
(2002)
‘Surviving “Survivor” in the Marquesas’
, Anthropology News (May):
6
.
38.
Rosaldo, R.
(1994)
‘Whose Cultural Studies?’
, American Anthropologist96:
525-529
.
39.
Roscoe, J.
(2001)
‘Big Brother Australia: Performing the “Real” Twenty-four-seven’
, International Journal of Cultural Studies4:
473-488
.
Shepherd, N.
and
K. Mathers
(2002):
‘Who’s Watching Big Brother? Reality Television and
Cultural Power in South Africa’
, Africa e Mediterranei38:
67-69
.
42.
Smith, M.J.
and
A.F. Wood
(2003) Survivor Lessons: Essays on Communication and Reality
Television.
Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co
.
43.
Steinmetz, G.
(2003)
‘The State of Emergency and the Revival of American Imperialism:
Toward an Authoritarian Post-Fordism’
, Public Culture15:
323-345
.
44.
Traube, E.
(1996)
‘The “Popular” in American Culture’
, Annual Review of Anthropology25:
127-151
.
45.
Turner, G.
(2001)
‘Television and Cultural Studies: Unfinished Business’
, International Journal of Cultural Studies4:
371-384
.
46.
Watson, T.
(2001)
‘An American Empire?’
, Postcolonial Studies4:
351-359
.
47.
Willis, P.E.
(2001) The Ethnographic Imagination.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
