This article argues for a more nuanced approach to the relationships between the figures of ‘consumer’ and ‘citizen’, normally assumed to exist in separate spaces. Against the idea that each acquires information and feelings of connection in isolation (the ‘plugged-in monad model’), the article argues for an open research agenda into how the spaces of public connection that frame both practices are sustained and the common issues of trust that affect them. This is linked to the author’s forthcoming research into media consumption and public connection. The conclusion reflects briefly on the policy implications of this research direction.
Barry, Andrew and Don Slater (2002) ‘Introduction: The Technological Economy’ , Economy and Society31(2): 175–193 .
3.
Benhabib, Seyla (1995) ‘Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference, pp. 67–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
4.
Castells, Manuel (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, Vol. 1: The Information Society. Oxford: Blackwell .
5.
Couldry, Nick (2003a) Media Rituals: A Critical Approach. London: Routledge .
6.
Couldry, Nick (2003b) ‘Passing Ethnographies: Rethinking the Sites of Agency and Reflexivity in a Mediated World’, in Patrick D. Murphy and Marwan Kraidy (eds) Global Media Studies: Ethnographic Perspectives, pp. 40–56. London and New York: Routledge .
7.
Downing, John (2002) ‘Radical Media Projects and the Crisis of Public Media’, in Robin Mansell, Rohan Samarajiva and Amy Mahan (eds) Networking Knowledge for Information Societies, pp. 300–307. Delft: Delft University Press .
8.
Downing, John (2003a) ‘The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition’, in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp. 243–258. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield .
9.
Downing, John (2003b) ‘Audiences and Readers of Alternative Media: The Absent Lure of the Virtually Unknown’ , Media, Culture & Society25(5): 625–646 .
10.
Dubet, FranÁois (1994) ‘The System, the Actor and the Social Subject’ , Thesis Eleven38: 16–35 .
11.
Gandy, Oscar (2002a) ‘Data Mining, Privacy and the Future of the Public Sphere’, 2nd Dixons Lecture, London School of Economics, 7 November. URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/depts/media
12.
Gandy, Oscar (2002b) ‘The Real Digital Divide’, in Leah A. Lievrouw and Sonia Livingstone (eds) The Handbook of New Media, pp. 448–460. London: Sage .
13.
Garnham, Nicholas (2000) ‘Information Society as Ideology: A Critique’ , Keywords3: 22–44 .
14.
Habermas, Jurgen (1996) Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
15.
Harvey, David (2000) Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press .
16.
Hirschman, Albert (1969) Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
17.
Katz, Elihu and Paul Lazarsfeld (1955) Personal Influence. Glencoe, IL: Free Press .
18.
Lim, Merlyna (2003) ‘The Internet, Social Networks and Reform in Indonesia’, in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp. 273–286. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Little-field .
19.
McMillan, Sally (2002) ‘Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions’, in L. Lievrouw and S. Livingstone (eds) The Handbook of New Media, pp. 163–182. London: Sage .
20.
Marcus, George (1999) ‘The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mise-en-scene of Anthropological Fieldwork’, in S. Ortner (ed.) The Fate of ‘Culture’: Geertz and Beyond. Berkeley: University of California Press .
21.
Miller, Toby (1999) ‘Television and Citizenship: A New International Division of Cultural Labor?’, in A. Calabrese and J.-C. Burgelman (eds) Communication, Citizenship and Social Policy, pp. 279–292. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield .
22.
Morris, Christine and Michael Meadows (2003) ‘Framing the Future: Indigenous Communication in Australia’, in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp. 71–88. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield .
23.
Office of the e-Envoy (2002) ‘In the Service of Democracy’. URL: http://www.edemocracy.gov.uk (accessed 16 Aug.).
24.
Putnam, Robert (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster .
25.
Radway, Janice (1988) ‘Reception Study: Ethnography and the Problems of Dispersed Audiences and Nomadic Subjects’ , Cultural Studies2(3): 359–376 .
26.
Rennie, Elinor (2002) ‘Community Media: Fenced off or Walled out? Finding a Space of Community in the New Media Environment’ , paper presented at the International Association for Media and Communication Research conference, Barcelona, July.
27.
Rifkin, Jeremy (2000) The Age of Access. Harmondsworth: Penguin .
28.
Rodriguez, Clemencia (2003) ‘The Bishop and His Star: Citizens’ Communication in Southern Chile’, in N. Couldry and J. Curran (eds) Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World, pp. 177–194. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield .
29.
Sen, Amartya (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
30.
Sunstein, Cass (2000) Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
31.
Touraine, Alain (1988) Return of the Actor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
32.
Touraine, Alain (2000) Can We Live Together? Cambridge: Polity Press .
33.
Wellman, Barry and Milena Gulia (1999) ‘Netsurfers Don’t Ride Alone: Virtual Communities as Communities’, in B. Wellman (ed.) Networks in the Global Village, pp. 331–366. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
34.
Wellman, Barry, Anabel Haase, James Witte and Keith Hampton (2001) ‘Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or Supplement Social Capital?’ , American Behavioral Scientist45(3): 436–455 .
35.
Wuthnow, Robert (1987) Communities of Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
