In this article I examine the cultural role of private and state-controlled television networks in India and their negotiation of identities through profitable hybrid programming. I draw attention to a new emerging power in processes of globalization: indigenous, regional television networks. Ethnography in Bangalore, India, in 1997 and 2000 revealed that regional, private, vernacular language networks indeed played a crucial role in local imaginings and, in the long run, may rise in tremendous political power through their manipulation and reflection of regional identity. The analysis leads to a critique of local media markets and the location of ‘nation’ in global media processes.
Aiyar, S. V. and A. Chopra (2000) ‘Great Gamble’, India Today25(9) (17 July): 48-54.
2.
Bhandare, N. and N. Joshi (1997) ‘Too Little, Too Late’, India Today (22 August): 9.
3.
Canclini, N. G. (1995) Hybrid Cultures: Strategies for Entering and Leaving Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Chatterji, P. C. (1991) Broadcasting in India. New Delhi: Sage.
5.
Curtin, M. (1997) ‘Dynasty in Drag: Imagining Global Television’, in L. Spigel and M. Curtin (eds) The Revolution Wasn’t Televised: Sixties Television and Social Conflict. New York: Routledge.
6.
Curtin, M. (1999) ‘Feminine Desire in the Age of Satellite Television’, Journal of Communication49(2): 55-70.
7.
Doordarshan (2000) At A Glance. http://www.ddindia.net/bk1/content/html (accessed 28 May 2000).
8.
Doordarshan Audience Research Unit (1996). New Delhi: Nutech Pholithographers.
9.
Economist (2000) ‘The Wiring of India’, (27 May): 63-64.
10.
Krishnan, P. and A. Dighe (1990) Affirmation and Denial: Construction of Femininity on Indian Television. New Delhi: Sage.
11.
McMillin, D.C. (1998) ‘Competing Networks, Hybrid Identities: Television and Audiences in India’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
12.
Mankekar, P. (1993) ‘Reconstituting “Indian Womanhood”: An Ethnography of Television Viewers in a North Indian City’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
13.
Mankekar, P. (1999) Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
14.
Morley, D. and K. Robins (1995) Spaces of Identity: Global Media, Electronic Landscapes and Cultural Boundaries. New York: Routledge.
15.
Price, M. E. (1995) Television, the Public Sphere and National Identity. Oxford: Clarendon.
16.
Rajagopal, A. (1996) ‘Mediating Modernity: Theorizing Reception on a Non-western Society’, The Communication Review1(4): 441-469.
17.
Roome, D. M. (1999) ‘Global Versus Local: “Audience-as-Public” in South African Situation Comedy’, International Journal of Cultural Studies2(3): 307-328.
18.
Sassen, S. (1996) ‘Whose City Is It? Globalization and the Formation of New Claims’, Public Culture8: 205-223.
19.
Shields, P. and S. Muppidi (1996) ‘Integration, the Indian State and STAR TV: Policy and Theory Issues’, paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, Illinois.
20.
The Times of India (Bangalore) (1997) ‘Midnight Session Not for MNC Ad Gimmicks: Elders’, (14 August): 7, 11.
21.
Wetzler, B. (2000) ‘Boomgalore’, Wired8(3): 152-172.
