Abstract
The article takes space as basic for discussing the electronic/media space and the psychic space of the subject. There are two major questions raised within this context: how to understand the relationship between those two spaces and how to understand ‘cyberfeminism’ (and its various practices). Comparing Donna Haraway’s cyborg with the definitions by Elizabeth Grosz, Judith Butler and Moira Gatens of gender and body, the main argument is that the two spaces must not be equated – as is often the case. Rather it takes sexual difference as enabling a space which is crossed by a desire whose ‘aim’ is not within but beyond the frame of cyberspace. Against this background, the ‘subject of a post-gender world’ is redefined as a subject who needs the electronic spaces as the stage where its gender identities can appear.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
