Most scholarship on film production cultures classifies editors as a marginalized workforce, garbed under contemporary neglect and archival absence. In this article, I foreground the role of editors, especially addressing how they navigate the terrains of producing a ‘disability affect’. Here, I define disability affect as the non-linear, intersecting, overlapping and interconnected production cultures that contribute towards mainstreaming disability representation in films as a genre and spectacle, eventually leading to its recognition as a format of diversifying content in contemporary Bollywood. Drawing on insights derived from 15 semi-structured interviews with editors, the following analysis attends to an indispensable, yet understated role played by editors who enhance, reassemble, intuitively decide and embrace the construction, rhythm and narrative sequencing of representing disabilities by moderating shot designs, lighting, jump cuts, closeups, aurality and timing of shots and cliffhangers. In doing so, this study maps how disability genres are contingent on and informed by the commodification, regulatory and commercialization principles developed by editors who continuously rewrite and repackage the ways they feel will most effectively mainstream the core essence of disability representation.
AhmedS (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
2.
AnwerMAroraA (eds) (2021) Bollywood’s New Woman: Liberalization, Liberation, and Contested Bodies. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
3.
BillingeS (2017) The Practical Guide to Documentary Editing: Techniques for TV and Film. New York: Routledge.
4.
BöhmCBattyC (2022) Evoking character perspective in screenplay directions: A multilingual approach to writing the ‘big print’. New Writing19(3): 351–372.
5.
BoseS (Director) (2014) Margarita with a straw [Film]. Viacom18 Motion Pictures.
6.
BrennanKGPearlmanK (2023) Creating character in editing. Media Practice and Education24(3): 235–252.
7.
BrosiusC (2010) India’s Middle Class: New Forms of Urban Leisure, Consumption and Prosperity. New York: Routledge.
8.
CaldwellJT (2008) Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
9.
ChenMYKhúcMKimJB (2023) Work will not save us: An Asian American crip manifesto. Disability Studies Quarterly43(1).
CrittendenR (2012) Fine Cuts: The Art of European Film Editing. London: Routledge.
12.
CunliffeACouplandC (2012) From hero to villain to hero: Making experience sensible through embodied narrative sensemaking. Human Relations65(1): 63–88.
13.
Du GayPPrykeM (eds) (2002) Cultural Economy: Cultural Analysis and Commercial Life. London: Sage.
14.
EllcessorE (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation, vol. 6. New York: New York University.
15.
EmaraIHHallerBA (2023) It’s weird for the people who aren’t used to it – And I want to make it less weird: Blindness community bloggers as legitimate voices of their lived experiences. New Media & Society27: 3720–3739.
16.
FriednerM (2017) How the disabled body unites the national body: Disability as ‘feel good’ diversity in urban India. Contemporary South Asia25(4): 347–363.
17.
FriersonM (2018) Herbert Zettl, Approaches to Building Screen Space and Vectors in Film and Video Editing Theory: How Editing Creates Meaning. New York: Routledge.
18.
GantiT (2012) Producing Bollywood: Inside the Contemporary Hindi Film Industry. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19.
Garland-ThomsonR (2005) Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society30(2): 1557–1587.
20.
GhaiA (2001) Disabled women: An excluded agenda of Indian feminism. Hypatia17(3): 49–66.
21.
GhoshN (2010) Embodied experiences: Being female and disabled. Economic and Political Weekly45: 58–63.
22.
GinsburgFRappR (2024) Disability Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23.
GowarikerA (Director) (2001) Lagaan: Once upon a time in India [Film]. Aamir Khan Productions.
24.
GrayJGershonD (2024) The unsituated comedy. Journal of Cinema and Media Studies63(4): 53–74.
25.
GunningT (1993) ‘Now you see it, now you don’t’: The temporality of the cinema of attractions. The Velvet Light Trap32: 3.
26.
HallKQ (2011) Reimagining disability and gender through feminist studies. Feminist Disability Studies2011: 1–10.
27.
HavensT (2007) Universal childhood: The global trade in children’s television and changing ideals of childhood. Global Media Journal6(10): 1–8.
28.
HesmondhalghDBakerS (2013) Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. New York: Routledge.
29.
HoekL (2014) Cut-pieces: Celluloid Obscenity and Popular Cinema in Bangladesh. New York: Columbia University Press.
30.
HoltJ (2020) Intuition in creative film editing practice: Using phenomenology to explain editing as an embodied experience. Media Practice and Education21(2): 121–132.
31.
HullfishS (2017) Art of the Cut: Conversations with Film and TV Editors. New York: Routledge.
32.
IyerU (2020) Dancing Women: Choreographing Corporeal Histories of Hindi Cinema. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
JenkinsH (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.
34.
KaferA (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
35.
KerschbaumSL (2022) Introduction: Signs of disability. In: KerschbaumSL (ed.) Signs of Disability. New York: Duke University Press, pp.1–18.
36.
McRuerR (2006) Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.
37.
MassumiB (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
MeekoshaH (1998) Body battles: Bodies, gender and disability. In: MeekoshaH (ed.) The Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives. London: Continuum, pp.163–180.
39.
MehtaM (2011) Censorship and Sexuality in Bombay Cinema. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
40.
MehtaS (2023) Where are the women? Gendered Indian digital production cultures post #MeToo. Television & New Media24(7): 770–790.
41.
MeuelD (2016) Women Film Editors: Unseen Artists of American Cinema. North Carolina: McFarland.
42.
MillsMSanchezR (2023) Crip Authorship: Disability as Method. New York: New York University Press.
43.
MiniDS (2024) Rated A. Soft-porn Cinema and Mediations of Desire in India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
NegusK (1997) The production of culture. In: Gay (ed.) Production of Culture/cultures of Production. London: Sage, pp.67–118.
46.
OldhamG (2012) First Cut 2: More Conversations with Film Editors. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47.
Onir (Director) (2006) Bas ek pal [Film]. Viacom 18 Motion Pictures.
48.
OrpenV (2003) Film Editing: The Art of the Expressive. London: Wallflower Press.
49.
PalJ (2013) Physical disability and Indian cinema. In: MogkM (ed.) Different Bodies: Essays on Disability in Film and Television. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Company, pp.109–130.
50.
PatilAR (Director) (1996) Bhairavi [Film].
51.
PearlmanK (2009) Cutting Rhythms: Shaping the Film Edit. London: Routledge.
52.
PearlmanKSuttonJ (2022) Reframing the director: Distributed creativity in filmmaking practice. In; HjortMNannicelliT (ed.) A Companion to Motion Pictures and Public Value. London: John Wiley & Sons, pp.86–105.
53.
PrasadM (2011) Diverting diseases. In: SenMBasuA (eds) Figurations in Indian Film. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.91–100.
54.
RaiA (2009) Untimely Bollywood: Globalization and India’s New Media Assemblage. Durham, NC, London: Duke University Press.
55.
RaiS (2024) Networked Bollywood: How Star Power Globalized Hindi Cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RaoS (2015) Body, behavior, boundaries, and belonging: Disability in contemporary Bollywood films. In: RaoSKalyanpurM (eds) South Asia and Disability Studies: Redefining Boundaries and Extending Horizons. New York: Peter Lang, pp.263–286.
57.
RauchbergJS (2022) #Shadowbanned: Queer, trans, and disabled creator responses to algorithmic oppression on TikTok. In: PainP (ed.) LGBTQ Digital Cultures: A Global Perspective. London: Routledge, pp.196–209.
58.
ReiszKMillarG (2009) Technique of Film Editing, Reissue of 2nd Edition, Burlington MA: Focal Press.
59.
ReynoldsS (1998) The face on the cutting-room floor: Women editors in the French cinema of the 1930s. Labour History Review63(1): 66–82.
60.
RussellJA (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review110(1): 145–172.
61.
SahaA (2012) ‘Beards, scarves, halal meat, terrorists, forced marriage’: Television industries and the production of race. Media, Culture & Society34(4): 424–438.
62.
SahaA (2018) Race and the Cultural Industries. Cambridge: Polity Press.
63.
Sanchez LozoyaZR (2022) Working with ‘monstrous men’: Ambivalent sexism in the Bombay film industry. Feminist Media Studies22(6): 1295–1310.
64.
SharpIS (2022) Esfir Shub: Pioneer of Documentary Filmmaking. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
65.
SiebersT (2010) Disability Aesthetics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
66.
SinhaPMehtaS (2025) Negotiating content: the interplay of politics, audience, and gender in Internet-based production cultures in India. Communication, Culture & Critique18(2): 184-192.
67.
SinhaP (2024) Scripting disability as the ‘New’ Bollywood: Pitching, reflecting, researching and negotiating. Media, Culture & Society46(4): 725–744.
68.
SnyderSLMitchellDT (2008) ‘How do we get all these disabilities in here?’: Disability film festivals and the politics of atypicality. Canadian Journal of Film Studies17(1): 11–29.
69.
TijoriD (Director) (2006) Tom, Dick, and Harry [Film]. Zee Telefilms.
70.
TseTShumHHK (2023) Platforms, politics and precarity: Hong Kong television workers amid the new techno-nationalist media agenda. European Journal of Cultural Studies26(3): 289–312.
71.
VirdiJ (2003) The Cinematic Imagination [Sic]: Indian Popular Films as Social History. London: Rutgers University Press.
72.
WilliamsL (1991) Film bodies: Gender, genre, and excess. Film Quarterly44(4): 2–13.
